Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

LOL. Actually, from January of last year to Thanksgiving I was able to run consistent mid-80 mile weeks even in the Houston climate. A few days before Thanksgiving I developed a sports hernia and been dealing with it for the last 5 months. I finally am getting over it and my mileage is up to about 70 miles a week. I still have adductor issues but keeps improving. I will be primed for my duel with Flagpole on July 4. He better bring his A game.

So, are you in sub 17 min shape? If you guys do meet up in Houston, pics MUST be posted on LR. Then again, it's obvious that Clownpole will not accept your offer.

I would love to post pics. I hope Flag accepts. I would pick him up at the airport and house him.

Caster wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I am not even sure what this means.

You are a 58 year old woman with a wife. Figure it out.

Geez . . . Sally needs directions.

Typical woman.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Lately this thread has devolved into arguing about the wall and what constitutes infanticide, and a few other off-topic things. The Trumpers are of course wrong on all topics. However, the main issue remains that we have a serial lying, criminal, nincompoop in the White House.

Just be clear...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole, I’m not old enough to remember Nixon, there are few here who are, but the parallels in presidential behavior are astonishing.

I for one would think AG Sessions quitting/being fired would have been a bigger deal. I would think all of these temporary unconfirmed cabinet appointments would be troubling. It’s a slippery slope.

All we have is Comey’s word. We don’t have what Nixon had, a tape confirming obstruction. Nixon would have remained without that.

Alan

Indeed!

I just re-read "All the President's Men". I would highly recommend it to anyone who has any (non-trolling) interest in the topic of this thread. While reading it one could swear it is all about the current presidency. Unbelievably similar.

skavsajcgtt wrote:

Caster wrote:

You are a 58 year old woman with a wife. Figure it out.

Geez . . . Sally needs directions.

Typical woman.

Am a guy but a very speedy guy.

I think it’s awesome the Flagpole accepted the bet.

Def need pix.

The Dems will proclaim some sort of I told you so tomorrow when there is nothing there.

Sally Vix wrote:

skavsajcgtt wrote:

Typical woman.

Am a guy but a very speedy guy.

So is Caster.

Sally Vix wrote:

Liberals here and around the country have been behaving like high school girls who don't like who was elected the prom queen. They don't respect the rule of law. They want to have a hissy fit but that is not what this country is about. Trump won the electoral vote fairly and squarely. Get over it. There was no collusion or conspiracy. Only an idiot would continue saying that after the Mueller team spent 2-plus years investigating. Again, if you continue with this narrative, you are a whacked out idiot. The jury has returned. Trump was elected lawfully.

Lets say all that is true and it may well be, why is that all you ever talk about?

Why don't you expect or demand better from Trump when he lies to you?

Trump was elected “awfully,” don’t need the L. Speaking of awful, Barr is just jumping through hoops to get ahead of the story, holding a press conference & notifying the WH before sharing even the heavily redacted report.

A snidey tactics for sure.

Make America Great Again wrote:

Khashoggi was killed by some rogue members who ran out of control. And 9/11 terrorists have nothing to do with Saudi government. Iranian terrorists are taking direct orders from the Supreme Leader. In fact, the entire Revolutionary Guard is a terrorist organization.

There is not a single non-retarded person on Earth who believes that such a killing could have taken place without orders from the very top.

Not one.

So you are either retarded (my condolences) or a liar (your own fault).

Ciro wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Liberals here and around the country have been behaving like high school girls who don't like who was elected the prom queen. They don't respect the rule of law. They want to have a hissy fit but that is not what this country is about. Trump won the electoral vote fairly and squarely. Get over it. There was no collusion or conspiracy. Only an idiot would continue saying that after the Mueller team spent 2-plus years investigating. Again, if you continue with this narrative, you are a whacked out idiot. The jury has returned. Trump was elected lawfully.

Lets say all that is true and it may well be, why is that all you ever talk about?

Why don't you expect or demand better from Trump when he lies to you?

I talk about a lot of stuff. I even have talked about my race with Flaggy. I just find it reprehensible that Dems are trying to overturn the election.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Lets say all that is true and it may well be, why is that all you ever talk about?

Why don't you expect or demand better from Trump when he lies to you?

I talk about a lot of stuff. I even have talked about my race with Flaggy. I just find it reprehensible that Dems are trying to overturn the election.

in sally talk, 'house oversight' apparently means 'overturning an election.'

weird, but that's sally talk.

But seriously, what is 'overturning an election?' you guys are the ones who impeached bill. Dems are the opposition party and have done nothing to overturn an election.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I talk about a lot of stuff. I even have talked about my race with Flaggy. I just find it reprehensible that Dems are trying to overturn the election.

in sally talk, 'house oversight' apparently means 'overturning an election.'

weird, but that's sally talk.

But seriously, what is 'overturning an election?' you guys are the ones who impeached bill. Dems are the opposition party and have done nothing to overturn an election.

"Overturning an election" is a far cry from impeachment. Impeachment just means to bring formal charges against a president. Clinton didi some really bad things and he was rightfully impeached.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

in sally talk, 'house oversight' apparently means 'overturning an election.'

weird, but that's sally talk.

But seriously, what is 'overturning an election?' you guys are the ones who impeached bill. Dems are the opposition party and have done nothing to overturn an election.

"Overturning an election" is a far cry from impeachment. Impeachment just means to bring formal charges against a president. Clinton didi some really bad things and he was rightfully impeached.

So.

The Rs take actual steps to remove a president. But that's not overturnign an election.

The Ds do nothing but use their constitutionally required power to execute oversight on the executive branch, and that IS overturning an election.

Do I have your argument straight?

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

"Overturning an election" is a far cry from impeachment. Impeachment just means to bring formal charges against a president. Clinton didi some really bad things and he was rightfully impeached.

So.

The Rs take actual steps to remove a president. But that's not overturnign an election.

The Ds do nothing but use their constitutionally required power to execute oversight on the executive branch, and that IS overturning an election.

Do I have your argument straight?

The Dems in the House can pursue impeachment proceedings. I welcome the Dems executing their oversight powers. What the Mueller investigation was a witch hunt. It had limited parameters but it looked at everything Trump.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

I can all but guarantee that the libs, PMSNBC & CNN will latch on to something in the report, distort it & run with it as evidence of a coverup/conspiracy. Just wait for the lib insanity to start tomorrow.

Mueller never

http://www.graphic-buffet.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Character_Clown-example.jpg

-pole forever

So will FOX. Both sides do this. It happened with the Starr Report too. Stop pretending your side is without blame.

There was obstruction, it’s just not provable. We had Nixon on tape. We don’t have Trump on tape.

The Trump-Russia connection was never about conspiracy. It’s all about business and using the presidency to further the goals of Trump .Org. That’s the big financial fish yet to be proven.

We already have felonies that Trump is tied to that if a Dem was tied to you would be asking for his head.

Alan

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

So.

The Rs take actual steps to remove a president. But that's not overturnign an election.

The Ds do nothing but use their constitutionally required power to execute oversight on the executive branch, and that IS overturning an election.

Do I have your argument straight?

The Dems in the House can pursue impeachment proceedings. I welcome the Dems executing their oversight powers. What the Mueller investigation was a witch hunt. It had limited parameters but it looked at everything Trump.

The Mueller investigation was initiated by Republicans in the Republican controlled department of justice. Rosenstein isa Republican. Mueller is a Republican. The Democrats had little to do with it at all.

The Mueller investigation was told to look into the russian influence on the election and other crimes it found. That was exactly what it did.

So your argument is that Republicns in the Department of Justice are trying to overturn the election. Is that right?

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

So.

The Rs take actual steps to remove a president. But that's not overturnign an election.

The Ds do nothing but use their constitutionally required power to execute oversight on the executive branch, and that IS overturning an election.

Do I have your argument straight?

The Dems in the House can pursue impeachment proceedings. I welcome the Dems executing their oversight powers. What the Mueller investigation was a witch hunt. It had limited parameters but it looked at everything Trump.

You don’t really know how the special counsel works do you? The special counsel has broad and far reaching authority to investigate any crime it comes across over the course of its investigation. That’s why we got Lewinskygate when Whitewater was a Nothing burger.

Alan