Harry Kooter wrote:
So if no one had died and you heard the results of this contest on the radio station, how many of you would be ranting about what a stupid idea it was? I'm guessing no one. It's just a stupid contest. Unfortunately, someone died. Although we all know that that was a possible outcome, it was not a likely outcome by any means. Hell, if some radio station put on a local 5k and gave the winner a wii, you'd all support it even though there is a possibility that someone will drop dead on the course. I'd imagine that most of you would participate in some kind of chug-n-run event if a local radio station put one on without saying that they were negligent and should be sued.
Again, it's not the fact that they held the contest, it's that they seem not to have done their homework and taken any precautions. Any RD who does the same should likewise burn.
Maybe you'd be in favor of a legal system in which only willful acts count, and there's no such thing as negligence. That's fine, but it's not what we have, and, as a result, people have some expectation of being reasonably protected, or informed of the specific dangers, when they participate in an organized event.
Also, I'd be quite pissed if a local radio station started giving out Wiis as race prizes, seeing as how I won a race put on by a local station a couple of months ago, and I didn't get jack.
Then again, I did skip all the water stations.