In this letter, I want to skip the usual preaching, moralizing, and pontificating and go straight to the facts. As I’m sure you’re aware, Mr. DamnFrauds has been fighting hard to replace Robert’s Rules of Order with facilitated consensus building at all important meetings. This letter is intended to address the issue of how most effectively to fight back. Our choice of strategy is critical because DamnFrauds’s rantings are based on a technique I’m sure you’ve heard of. It’s called "gaslighting".
When was the last time you heard DamnFrauds mention that it pains me to avoid profanity in describing his thrasonical, spleeny memoirs? Probably never. That’s why he insists that we have too much freedom. Go home, DamnFrauds; you’re drunk. Any sober person would realize that DamnFrauds may be evil, but he’s not stupid. He knows he’ll never get away with resolving a moral failure with an immoral solution, at least not any time soon. If he tried, the whole world would know that his overweening ploys often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of quibbleism and mammonism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain.
Who do these people think they are? Don’t they know we see right through their nonsense?
When you read a lot and look up every word that you don’t know, using a large vocabulary comes naturally.
Just last week I used the term “cognitive dissonance “ in a conversation, and I could tell that a couple of people thought that I was trying to sound smart, but I wasn’t. Of course I AM smart, but I was not trying to flaunt it.
Just last week I used the term “cognitive dissonance “ in a conversation, and I could tell that a couple of people thought that I was trying to sound smart, but I wasn’t. Of course I AM smart, but I was not trying to flaunt it.
You have to use “flaunt” when you mean “flout” to be able to both flaunt your intelligence and prove your independent thinking by flouting convention .
(but we may have hit ignoramus critical mass on that one so that it’s now deemed a new alternate conventional form)
Just last week I used the term “cognitive dissonance “ in a conversation, and I could tell that a couple of people thought that I was trying to sound smart, but I wasn’t. Of course I AM smart, but I was not trying to flaunt it.
You have to use “flaunt” when you mean “flout” to be able to both flaunt your intelligence and prove your independent thinking by flouting convention .
(but we may have hit ignoramus critical mass on that one so that it’s now deemed a new alternate conventional form)