So, your new personal hypothesis is that the difference between macro dosing full-throttle, and micro dosing measured throttle is 2%, causing a near complete regression to pre-EPO era times.
The next step then is to work on observing, or otherwise confirming these new hypotheses. For example, since you say "measurable effects", has anyone measured these effects?
We also encounter the next set of contradictions. Outside of Africa, there was no large effect observed during the full throttle EPO-era years, and then there was an improvement in the era of improved testing.
Outside of African, 4 runners ran sub-13 in the full-throttle era, and 4 runners ran sub-13 post-2005 and post-ABP.
This leads to absurd conclusions like no talented non-Africans ever full throttle doped in the EPO era, despite the potential to improve by some 15-20 seconds, and the complete lack of testing, or the ease to beat the first tests.
Or, it suggests that non-Africans have less talent than the best Africans.
We can again come up with a new set of explanations, but then the next step is to work on observing, or otherwise confirming these new hypotheses.
I'm well aware of the many competing drug effect theories that apparently only Africans could leverage and get away with.
But I would be more interested in expanding the discussion regarding these "other factors" with more specificity.
Can you elaborate on what these "other factors" are for Morocco, and why they can be dismissed so easily?