fisky wrote:
The burden of proof in a civil court is “a preponderance of evidence.” Analysis of the 2019 LA Marathon video posted on Marathon Investigation provides that level of proof AND shows us how it most likely was done.
As I said yesterday, this is not a trial, no 'preponderance of evidence required', an RD can just simply withhold his result, end of story.
Have one look at him and say "nah, you didn't run all of this at that pace, prove it"... up to him to then expose himself and be shown what he actually did.
Same with the ratification of records.