Concerned Senior wrote:
There are 7 million reasons why we don't need a revote ! Check the scoreboard !!
How many of those 7 million are fraudulent? How many of the 81 million are fraudulent? I would love to know and so should you.
Concerned Senior wrote:
There are 7 million reasons why we don't need a revote ! Check the scoreboard !!
How many of those 7 million are fraudulent? How many of the 81 million are fraudulent? I would love to know and so should you.
Sally Vix wrote:
Concerned Senior wrote:
There are 7 million reasons why we don't need a revote ! Check the scoreboard !!
How many of those 7 million are fraudulent? How many of the 81 million are fraudulent? I would love to know and so should you.
Since we're asking questions, how many of Trump's votes are fraudulent? Trump himself voted by mail; among the tin foil hat crowd, that vote shouldn't count.
There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden.
Concerned Senior wrote:
There are 7 million reasons why we don't need a revote ! Check the scoreboard !!
The question was why are you afraid of a re-vote. You've confirmed, via deflection, that you are afraid of it. But why? Because you know how a re-vote will end up. You don't need to be the Amazing Kreskin to know who will win the re-vote.
johnny99 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
How many of those 7 million are fraudulent? How many of the 81 million are fraudulent? I would love to know and so should you.
Since we're asking questions, how many of Trump's votes are fraudulent? Trump himself voted by mail; among the tin foil hat crowd, that vote shouldn't count.
There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden.
Oh really? Let's analyze your statement: "There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden."
From what I can tell Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensberger is not investigating any republican groups for fraud. He is only investigating Stacey Abrams and a few other DEMOCRAT groups for fraud. Would you concur with that?
Not only that but the Stacey Abrams group being investigated for fraud was previously chaired by Democratic Senate candidate Raphael Warnock.
Seems every Democrat in Georgia is involved in this fraud.
Sally Vix wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Since we're asking questions, how many of Trump's votes are fraudulent? Trump himself voted by mail; among the tin foil hat crowd, that vote shouldn't count.
There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden.
Oh really? Let's analyze your statement: "There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden."
From what I can tell Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensberger is not investigating any republican groups for fraud. He is only investigating Stacey Abrams and a few other DEMOCRAT groups for fraud. Would you concur with that?
My suggestion is that you read the links you post before commenting on them, to retain perhaps a shred of dignity.
From your link:
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has launched investigations into several groups, including one founded by former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, for seeking to “aggressively” register “ineligible, out-of-state, or deceased voters” before the state’s Jan. 5 Senate runoff elections.
Raffensperger's investigation has nothing to do with the Presidential election, or any election held on 11/3. It has nothing to do with Biden, or Trump for that matter. It has nothing to do with any election that's been held already. It has to do with the Senate runoff election scheduled for 1/5.
I'll repeat: There's as much evidence of fraud benefitting Trump as there is of fraud benefitting Biden. And I'll help you out by providing a more relevant link to the question of potential voter fraud in the Presidential election.
https://www.businessinsider.com/georgia-secretary-of-state-dishonest-actors-trump-2020-election-results-2020-11Some Republicans are showing their true colors.
Shake a right wing party and some number of fascists will come out.
Mo Brooks. Remember the name.
He is trying to end democracy in America.
I'm sure he'll find a R senator to play coup with him, and they will jam up the proceedings for a day.
MO PROBLEMS -- Scooplet: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) has been telling colleagues and allies that he plans to challenge the Electoral College votes when Congress officially certifies Joe Biden’s victory on Jan. 6, as long as a Senate Republican joins him in the long-shot effort, sources tell your Huddle host.
Brooks confirmed his plans in a phone interview, adding that he is still considering objecting to the vote-counting process even if no one joins him — though he acknowledged that would be more of a symbolic protest. Brooks, echoing President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud without providing evidence, argued that the election was “badly flawed” and that most mail-in voting is “unconstitutional.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/huddle/2020/12/02/the-gops-electoral-mischief-491033
MelRnr wrote:
agip wrote:
https://twitter.com/dayphorisms/status/1334001760222867456?s=21It's really nuts.
But I've said it before... Trumpers are not patriotic Americans. They would gladly throw away the Constitution.
Indeed.
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
agip wrote:
Some Republicans are showing their true colors.
Shake a right wing party and some number of fascists will come out.
Mo Brooks. Remember the name.
He is trying to end democracy in America.
I'm sure he'll find a R senator to play coup with him, and they will jam up the proceedings for a day.
MO PROBLEMS -- Scooplet: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) has been telling colleagues and allies that he plans to challenge the Electoral College votes when Congress officially certifies Joe Biden’s victory on Jan. 6, as long as a Senate Republican joins him in the long-shot effort, sources tell your Huddle host.
Brooks confirmed his plans in a phone interview, adding that he is still considering objecting to the vote-counting process even if no one joins him — though he acknowledged that would be more of a symbolic protest. Brooks, echoing President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud without providing evidence, argued that the election was “badly flawed” and that most mail-in voting is “unconstitutional.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/huddle/2020/12/02/the-gops-electoral-mischief-491033
Agip - It was YOU who was calling for the Electoral College voters to go against the norm in 2016 and refuse to elect Trump.! Am I right? Are you not the biggest hypocrite here???
Sally Vix wrote:
Concerned Senior wrote:
There are 7 million reasons why we don't need a revote ! Check the scoreboard !!
How many of those 7 million are fraudulent? How many of the 81 million are fraudulent? I would love to know and so should you.
Sure, if there is actual evidence of fraud. It's been 4 weeks and zilch. Even Trump lackey Barr confirmed this. If there was fraud on such a massive scale it should not be that hard to find.
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
Some Republicans are showing their true colors.
Shake a right wing party and some number of fascists will come out.
Mo Brooks. Remember the name.
He is trying to end democracy in America.
I'm sure he'll find a R senator to play coup with him, and they will jam up the proceedings for a day.
MO PROBLEMS -- Scooplet: Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) has been telling colleagues and allies that he plans to challenge the Electoral College votes when Congress officially certifies Joe Biden’s victory on Jan. 6, as long as a Senate Republican joins him in the long-shot effort, sources tell your Huddle host.
Brooks confirmed his plans in a phone interview, adding that he is still considering objecting to the vote-counting process even if no one joins him — though he acknowledged that would be more of a symbolic protest. Brooks, echoing President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud without providing evidence, argued that the election was “badly flawed” and that most mail-in voting is “unconstitutional.”
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/huddle/2020/12/02/the-gops-electoral-mischief-491033Agip - It was YOU who was calling for the Electoral College voters to go against the norm in 2016 and refuse to elect Trump.! Am I right? Are you not the biggest hypocrite here???
Not relevant.
There are two possible topics to discuss:
1) The holiness (or lack thereof) of a particular poster
of
2) The actual topic at hand
Neither is relevant to the other. So pick one.
If you pick 1) you are officially on record as being unwilling or unable to talk about the actual topic at hand. Indeed, it seems you already did pick 1).
Let us know when you think you are ready to discuss 2) the actual topic at hand.
agip wrote:
https://twitter.com/dayphorisms/status/1334001760222867456?s=21
Does anyone doubt that the R's in the Senate and House would back him every step of the way?
Sally Vix wrote:
Not only that but the Stacey Abrams group being investigated for fraud was previously chaired by Democratic Senate candidate Raphael Warnock.
Seems every Democrat in Georgia is involved in this fraud.
Man, you are one little butthurt MFer. Stop crying. ?
Speaking to the Associated Press, Barr said that, "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election."
Sally Vix wrote:
More widespread voting fraud by the Democrats and this time in Georgia. It just never ends. Hey LIbs here - how come NOT ONE of you has posted this. Are you for fair elections or the ends justify the means? You should be ashamed of yourselves. This lady was almost your vice president.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/voter-group-founded-by-stacey-abrams-under-investigation-seeking-out-of-state-dead
^ LOLz it’s going to be fun watching you and biff continue to get your hopes up only to face catastrophic disappointment again. Your orange boy is done, find another hero. But do write trump some checks to help his cause out.
1101 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Agip - It was YOU who was calling for the Electoral College voters to go against the norm in 2016 and refuse to elect Trump.! Am I right? Are you not the biggest hypocrite here???
Not relevant.
There are two possible topics to discuss:
1) The holiness (or lack thereof) of a particular poster
of
2) The actual topic at hand
Neither is relevant to the other. So pick one.
If you pick 1) you are officially on record as being unwilling or unable to talk about the actual topic at hand. Indeed, it seems you already did pick 1).
Let us know when you think you are ready to discuss 2) the actual topic at hand.
If a poster is blatantly practicing hypocrisy, then that is relevant to any discussion. Would you not agree with that? It kind of negates anything he is throwing out there. He or she needs to be admonished. Yes?
seguro wrote:
Flybang mash wrote:
Why are you liberals so afraid of a re-vote?
-1/10
You Trumpers are like the whiny runner who loses a race and screams for a re-run. You reason a re-run is mandatory is that the runner who beat up ran faster than you did and that is not allowed. The winner and officials ignore you, you throw a major fit and end up pooping in your diaper as a way to prove you are right.
Lol, sally and the other trumpanzees like to pretend they are in Russia. They don’t acknowledge American laws - they just to make Trump happy. 74 million idiots desperately trying to make the orange one feel good. Fkn suckers to the core.
"But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud."
---------------------------------------------
The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”
--------------------------------------------
The stipulation of facts reads in part: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” The stipulation also says they don’t allege or have evidence of “misconduct” or “impropriety” in connection with the challenged ballots.
-------------------------------------------
The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots...
------------------------------------------
On Nov. 12, the same day that the President himself was tweeting about hundreds of thousands of votes being stolen from him, a Trump campaign attorney Kory Langhofer told a judge, “We are not alleging fraud in this lawsuit. We are not alleging anyone stealing the election.”
-----------------------------------------