grade inflation is definitely a reality in undergraduate education. last year, princeton took public steps towards erradicating the problem. it is definitely still a problem for the ivies; i believe 90 percent of harvard graduates graduate with honors. i heard that stat from a student at harvard so i have no citation for it, but he implied that no one got c's. my brother at princeton said no one got c's there either.
grade inflation exists for two reasons. the first being grad school admissions and job placement. us news rates schools somewhat based on these two statistics which are heavily rooted in undergraduate gpa. harvard doesnt want its student not getting into med school because the student from umass had the better gpa. harvard contends that, in theory, its school is more difficult so, all things being equal, the umass student would have a better chance at obtaining admission. harvard then thinks, "why should the umass kid get in over the harvard kid? the harvard kid is smarter." this thought roots itself in the belief that each student attends the best university he or she can get admitted to. the harvard student is better than the umass student who is better than the cc student. harvard feels its students are being unfairly penalized for going to harvard, though they are better students than those that go to umass and get into med school with better gpas. so, the incoming freshman thinks, would i rather go to harvard and not get into med school or umass and get into med school. harvard doesnt want that decision to have to be made. this is true for job placement as well. goldman sachs and other ibanking jobs, though toolish, have minimum gpas (3.5 i think). same question again: would i rather go to harvard and not get a job or umass and get a job? also, because grad school acceptance and job placement are determining factors in the decision making process of an incoming freshman, they are weighted in the us news rankings. for harvard to unseat princeton as top school they could increase grad school acceptance and job placement by inflating their grades.
the second reasons schools inflate grades is based loosely on the assumption harvard makes in the previous paragraph. believing their students to be better than umass students, harvard thinks they should get better grades. harvard assumes, since their students are all 3.9/ 1500 students, that their students are smarter than those at umass and thus, should get grades equal to those at umass. if these students would be A students at other schools, we shouldnt give them the incentive to do so.
i dont agree with grade inflation, but it exists everywhere. i dont think it will stop either.