What does Ryan Hill's 7:30.9 3k convert to for 5k?

The McMillan calculator gives 13:10.

What say you Trackbot?

12:58 based on a comparison to Bob Kennedy.

xcyclist wrote:

The McMillan calculator gives 13:10.

I'm not buying McMillan on this one. Daniel Komen's WR 7:20 3k "only" converts to 12:53 according to McMillan. I would assume at least 10 seconds faster than that.

a%s-98uwenijdf678 wrote:

What say you Trackbot?

TrackBot! VDOT 7:30.9 3k

TrackBot! VDOT 7:30.875 3000 m

VDOT for 7:30.9 3km: 81.2

Equivalent race times based on VDOT:

Marathon: 02:05:57

Half marathon: 01:00:06

15K: 00:41:51

10K: 00:27:20

5K: 00:13:07

3Mi: 00:12:38

2Mi: 00:08:08

3200m: 00:08:05

3K: 00:07:32

1Mi: 00:03:48

1600m: 00:03:47

1500m: 00:03:32

I am a bot. Info:

http://habs.sdf.org/trackbot

Going by Jack Daniels Vdot chart it's about 13:05 which is his pr I believe

huh, who knew 7:30 equals 7:32

VDOT for 7:30.875 3.0km: 81.4

Equivalent race times based on VDOT:

Marathon: 02:05:41

Half marathon: 00:59:58

15K: 00:41:46

10K: 00:27:16

5K: 00:13:06

3Mi: 00:12:37

2Mi: 00:08:07

3200m: 00:08:04

3K: 00:07:31

1Mi: 00:03:48

1600m: 00:03:46

1500m: 00:03:31

I am a bot. Info:

http://habs.sdf.org/trackbot

IAAF table has 12:53.

Don't know where this 13:05-13:10 stuff comes from.

Hill is in PR form, 13:00 +/- 2 sec; anything faster than 12:58 a huge surprise, anything slower than 13:02 a disappointment, and he can expect the reduction clause to kick and Cappriotti and his Nike thugs at his doorstep asking for payback or broken legs.

You heard it here!

That's a hard conversion to make. Ryan Hill may just be better at 3k than at 5k. What we do know is that he should be able to hang with the pace through 3k. I thought he had been doing well in the last couple of years with his final kick when he did the 5k. Have we had many opportunities to see him run a hard 5k straight through?

Shoebacca wrote:

That's a hard conversion to make. Ryan Hill may just be better at 3k than at 5k. What we do know is that he should be able to hang with the pace through 3k. I thought he had been doing well in the last couple of years with his final kick when he did the 5k. Have we had many opportunities to see him run a hard 5k straight through?

agree. just talking straight conversions from a table is different than predicting what Ryan Hill may or may not do in a well-paced flat out 5000 meters.

IAAF table wrote:

Shoebacca wrote:

That's a hard conversion to make. Ryan Hill may just be better at 3k than at 5k. What we do know is that he should be able to hang with the pace through 3k. I thought he had been doing well in the last couple of years with his final kick when he did the 5k. Have we had many opportunities to see him run a hard 5k straight through?

agree. just talking straight conversions from a table is different than predicting what Ryan Hill may or may not do in a well-paced flat out 5000 meters.

Of course. I was just interested in the theoretical "should"

Might break 18

Alls I was doing was giving the "equivalent" according to the data

I said he was going under 13 today anyway already

huh690 wrote:

huh, who knew 7:30 equals 7:32

Reason for this is she only uses VDOTs to the nearest tenth. For all intents and purposes, in terms of aerobic fitness a 7:30.9 3K is equivalent to a 7:32.0.

13:20?

It's equivalent to 13:02.