The biggest joke about that contract is that the relationship between the coach and athlete finally deteriorated to the point where the coach felt compelled to make the athlete sign a contract stipulating:
Not to post anything Gator Track Team related on her web site. Not entirely unreasonable.
The athlete would be required to show up to practice and rehab sessions. This has to be put into a contract?
The athlete would do what the coaches said and not be disruptive at practice. This has to be put into a contract?
The athlete would NOT do what the coaches did NOT say to do in regards to TRAINING. This has to be put into a contract?
Let me ask you: Were you on a scholarship or the member of a collegiate program? Did you do your own thing, or did you follow the direction of the coach? If you did not agree with the coach, did you think that you could do your own thing and still remain a member of the team?
Karen is very talented, and she used her talent to make it to the Oly Trials. If she did not like the program at Florida, then she should have simply quit instead of trying to do her own thing while remaining an official team member.
This whole thing is obviously much more than what we are being led to believe. Coaches are not given free reign with an athlete's scholarship, either. They are not at the whim of pulling an athletic scholarship commitment just for the heck of it. There are procedures involved. I've dealt with athletes who did not show up to practice, were basically disruptive and no longr produced. It is and was easier to kick these athletes off of the team and continue to pay their scholarship commitment than to try and kick them off and revoke a scholarship. About the only thing a coach can do is prove non-performance, and those claims are easy for the athlete to refute by claiming injuries.
Stop defending Karen and give us more facts.