It would be interesting to hear the coach's side of the story. One can infer from the contract that:
A) She was posting her training regiment on her website. As a coach, I would appreciate if the training program that I was administering to my athletes were not posted on the Internet for the competition to see.
B) She was not doing as the coaches were advising, and while ignoring the coaching staff, was vocally or using body language to emphasize her disrespect.
C) She was supplementing her training program with additional workouts, while not under the advisement of the coaching staff. Her pereived attitude of having more knowledge than the coaches raised the risk her injury, something a coach does not want to happen ever. But, since Karen was an athlete, ignoring the coach put his investment at risk.
D) She was not showing up to practice consistently, and when she did show up, she was disruptive.
E) When asked to cease and desist being a pain in the ass and just being a coachable athlete, Karen reluctantly agreed to sign the contract.
I think Karen needs to congratulated for a stellar career and her placing at the Oly Trials, but her website comes nowhere near giving the visitors to her site any insight as to why she was dismissed. Given her vague explanations versus the very clear dismissal letter from the coach, I think the coach did the right thing.