coach d wrote:
Those two people (Cush and Lagat) are not even close to comparable. Cush has every reason to be happy with his results, but Lagat owns EVERY masters WR in his age group from 1500 to 5000. He owns two American OPEN records set as officially as masters athlete.
Cush > Lagat?
Not now, not ever. These kinds of arrogant claims are why a fair number of young people frankly despise masters athletics. I think a little respect for a guy who has won 7 championship medals for the USA might be in order.
only because it's sunday/st.patty's day, and every once in a while i enjoy arguing nonsense (and where better than letsrun?), and once again for the sarcasm challenged:
age 23--i may have gotten him here, but too lazy to check exact math/birth dates/time of year:
cush>lagat
age 24
lagat>cush
age 25
lagat>cush
age 26
lagat>cush
age 27
lagat>cush
age 28
lagat>cush
age 29
lagat>cush
age 30
lagat>cush
age 31
lagat>cush
age 32
lagat>cush
age 33
lagat>cush
age 34
lagat>cush
age 35
lagat>cush
age 36
lagat>cush
age 37
lagat>cush
age 38
lagat>cush
age 39
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 40
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 41
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 42
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 43
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 43
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 44
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
age 45
cush>lagat (until he, or anyone else through a time machine trip to the future, can prove otherwise)
so, will he get my record, or sorenson's, or hatton's, or burns', or shaheed's, or patton's, or rose's, or carter's, or benham's, or funk's, or spangler's, or kirk's? who knows? and, outside the niche audience of masters runners, and a few faithful followers who are somehow motivated and/or inspired by old people exploits, who cares?
so lighten up francis...