jdjdjsj wrote:
Or what if I'm not on Facebook in the back corner? Maybe I just don't have anything to say or contribute. I shouldn't be punished for this. Maybe the material just really isn't that interesting.
Obviously you don't have to be dominating a discussion each class to get all of the points. In fact, you don't even have to SAY something each class. But overall, it should be clear from your performance in class over the semester that you have completed the readings, thought deeply about them and have formed an opinion, and can intelligently discuss that opinion with other students. That is part of the class -- a measure of your quality as a history student -- and it's not something that can be tested on an exam. Don't see how this is so problematic.
Class discussions are on highly debated and controversial topics. If you don't have anything to contribute all semester, you're not engaging with the material.
And if you're not interested in history, sorry. That is what the class is about -- it doesn't give you a free pass not to do any of the work.
Anyway, it is fun hearing some of the excuses students give for why they can't do their work. Grandparent mortality spikes during exam time. There are also some much more creative ones. (I'm sorry I had to get up and leave during the middle of the exam. I forgot I had a gun in my car. Can I take the rest of the exam tomorrow?)
My dad's personal guideline is that everyone deserves one break so if you're timely and honest with him and understand that you screwed up, you'll probably get the day's extension. But if you have "problem" after "problem" and don't attend class much, and then you ask for a break, he's going to have a talk with you about how you're structuring your life so that these things keep getting in the way of your classes.