bigger picture wrote:
[quote]The Judge wrote:
Come back soon my small brained friend.
Congrats. You have mastered the add hominem attack. Shows integrity.
The Judge wrote:"So we can assume you totally honest about everything you do and think with your spouse?"
Ummm. Yes.[quote]The Judge wrote:
You lost all credibility here.
******************************************
OK, so let's review:
First you post:
(1) The crux of this whole matter is that (2) we put too much value on sex. We see sex what a whole relationship is about. Because I guarantee you that everyone of you here who criticizing this guy has lied to you significant pother and have secrets you would never them. Maybe you look at porn, maybe you hate people of certain ethnicity, maybe you steal things, maybe yo have read their diary, whatever. All are bad but somehow we all justify bad treatment of others or decide our secrets are best kept hidden.
(3) The reality is that most people cheat on their spouse at one time or another and (4) we are stuck with a silly Puritanical morality that says that one silly act of sex is justification is enough to ruin a relation ship that is otherwise great.
(5)Maybe we all should grow up and realize that sex is small peanuts and that if (6) one orgasm is enough to ruin your relationship of 20 years, you're a f***ing immature baby that has weak sense of commitment.
Please allow me to point out that in this one post you have:
1) Completely missed on what is really the crux of the matter (as I pointed out in my reply).
(2) Made completely unfounded assumptions about the behavior of "everyone" else.
(3) Made a claim that does not seem to be backed up by the statistics
(4) Again made an unfounded assumption about others, in this case that they "are stuck with a silly Puritanical morality..."
(5) Made an general claim about apparently everyone else's lack of maturity and I suppose by inference your own superiority (rather amusing when juxtaposed with your subsequent "high horse" comment, don't you think)
(6) Completely missed the point and as a double play managed to throw in a gratuitous ad hominem attack complete with the foulest of language.
******************************************************
My response, and my point. Which I must say remains THE point:
Nope, that is definitely NOT the crux of the matter.
The crux of the matter is honesty and integrity. Every person deserves to know the truth about things that they consider important. In particular they especially deserve to know the truth from their most trusted partner (aka spouse). It is only with this that they may make their own decisions based on the most accurate picture of their universe possible.
1) It is NOT up to you to determine what is or is not considered important to your spouse.
2) It is not acceptable to effectively lie (by omission) to your spouse about something that they consider important.
This is the crux of the matter.
And the reality is that you don't have the balls to face your wife after telling her the truth. Everything else is just the rationalization of a coward.
*************************************************************
Which your reply addressed nothing of the issue involved:
(1) So we can assume you totally honest about everything you do and think with your spouse?
Or is sex the only thing you need to be honest about? (2) You again fall victim to attributing a ridiculous importance on sex and pretend the areas you choose to lie about (by omission perhaps) are not as important. (3) You're a victim of a culture that id fixated by sex.
(4) Relationships require dishonesty and you can easily forget about your dishonesty because you feel "it is different." (5) Get off your high horse.
Herein you have:
(1) Asked a silly rhetorical question to which you assumed you knew the answer. Unfortunately for your credibility you do not know me (or anyone else on these boards) better than I/they know myself/themselves.
(2) Made an absurd assumption about what level of importance I place on sex. Once again you take the rather startling jump of seemingly knowing me and my assumptions better than I do. Especially as I said nothing that could possibly back up your claim for me.
(3) Claimed victimhood for me. Thank you oh all knowing Big Picture kind of guy. How I love the notion of playing the victim (well, not really). But it truly is kind of you to supply me with a ready made excuse for my own stupidity. How can I ever repay you?
(4) Made a general claim about relationships that is certainly not justified. Perhaps you have made the intellectual mistake of assuming that whatever applies to you and your relationship applies to all. Just a thought.
(5) Made a rather amusing comment about "high horses". I think that it is fair to point out that most of what you have written has nothing at all to do with what I wrote and certainly nothing whatsoever that you have written has reasonably addressed my points. My points were A) It is NOT up to you to determine what is or is not considered important to your spouse and B) It is not acceptable to effectively lie (by omission) to your spouse about something that they consider important. Ah yes, quite the high horse.
******************************************
To which I replied:
Hey, good to hear from someone with very little brain. One of my favorite attributes in an LRC poster. Makes for good laughs.
So, where to begin:
"So we can assume you totally honest about everything you do and think with your spouse?"
Ummm. Yes.
I have to admit that the fact that you appear to find that hard to believe is quite amazing to me. Being honest in general comes more naturally to me than being dishonest. Not that I have never been dishonest with anyone about anything - but those instances are pretty few and far between.
Then, when I factor in that my wife is my best friend, my confidant, the love of my life, and (truth in advertising here) the most beautiful woman that I have ever laid eyes on, the notion of being dishonest to her seems preposterous. I would betray my best friend's trust in order to get laid? Weird.
Now for:
"Or is sex the only thing you need to be honest about? You again fall victim to attributing a ridiculous importance on sex and pretend the areas you choose to lie about (by omission perhaps) are not as important. You're a victim of a culture that id fixated by sex."
As for sex being the only thing that I am honest about? No, I am honest about everything with my wife. It really isn't that difficult.
As for "You again fall victim to attributing a ridiculous importance on sex..."
Nope. Try reading my first post. Hint: It is the one you responded to.
I think that I stated fairly clearly that sex (and puritanical or other attitudes toward sex) were NOT the crux of the matter. Do you need to have that spelled out for you? Oh wait, I forgot, this is a message board so all of this is spelled out. I'm not sure how to make it any clearer. Again, go read my earlier post again. It is all about honesty and integrity.
Now perhaps instead of posting meaningless drivel with unfounded assumptions about the person you are addressing you might want to actually try to refute the very simple ideas that I posted.
Come back soon my small brained friend.
********************************************
Which you so convincingly objected to with:
Congrats. You have mastered the add hominem attack. Shows integrity.
[quote]The Judge wrote:"So we can assume you totally honest about everything you do and think with your spouse?"
Ummm. Yes.[quote]The Judge wrote:
You lost all credibility here.
*******************************************
Let's see, you apparently lack the capacity to understand that not everyone is dishonest with their spouse. It is a shame that your intellectual capacity is so limited. Or perhaps I should assume that indeed it is so superior that somehow you are able to deduce the state of everyone else's relationship from that of yours (see any irony there, Big Fella?).
Oh, yes, you did complain about an add (sic) hominem attack. This from the individual who posted about others whose perspective is different from his that they are apparently "f***ing immature babies". Yes, yes you certainly have me convinced. I tell you, you just can't make this stuff up. It really happens, right here on LRC.
But, being that I am a nice guy I will help you out here by pointing out that ad hominem attacks have nothing whatsoever to do with integrity, neither positively nor negatively. These are quite unrelated concepts. So, I will not impugn your integrity because of your ad hominem attack. I will simply point out that you have:
1) Made many, many wild, global assumptions about me and others
2) Not addressed what I correctly pointed out was the crux of the matter
and (3) Hid behind the "I'm not going to play anymore because of an ad hominem attack" wall.
Very impressive.
Meanwhile I have:
1) Not made all these global assumptions
2) Directly addressed the crux of the matter
and 3) Got a good chuckle out of your add hominem defense
Nonetheless I will give you another chance. Be ready.