Adrian Marriott wrote:
What makes the difference is the depth of field. I was running with John and Simon Jones and it is the first time I have run a road 10k in a group the whole way. So its no surprise that we get a heap of guys running 29xx when they are pushing each other.
We can learn from this for other races. Would be good to see a stacked field for the AAA 10,000m and Bristol Half in September. Fewer, higher quality races is the way to go ...
Agree, we could do with a series of fast road races targeted by a number of the best athletes, rather than everyone running the local village fun run. Maybe like the US Championships at a variety of disatnces (5k, 10k, 15k, half marathon, 25k), with prize money from a large organisation (e.g. The London Marathon?). I know we have AAA champs at some of these distances but are they always targeted by the best athletes and at appropriate times of the year?
Also, a few more opportunites for fast 5000m and 10,000m on the track wouldn't go a miss. With a lot of people running fast at manchester, would a mid May date be a better time for a track 10k than a month later (regarding temperature and stage of training?). Look at the US results from 10ks at Stanford early season, gives 5k specialists a chance while they are strong coming off a xc season and before they drop down later in the summer. Just some thoughts based on the Americans' success.