Boy on daughters xc team

12:24 is very fast for a middle school girl. Would place near the top at sectionals.

14:37 is quite slow. If that's the 2nd best time then no one else on that team is even remotely competitive. Maybe the coach recruited this person because she was sick of losing?

Elvin wrote:

Yusef Scumm. wrote:

Pull your child from the team. The other parents should do the same.

The only way the school will pay attention is if it costs them money

Right, because middle school XC is a real cash cow for schools.

It's a jungle out there. Haven't you heard about the agents from Asics hanging out at middle school track meets trying to get a leg up on the other companies?

No. Me either.

Bidens America everyone

gender is a construct and fluid

except if you are a TOXIC WHITE MALE, then you are oppressing everyone else with your existence and promoting "white rage"

are you sure? wrote:

Woke is a horrible, horrible joke wrote:

You are much worse than cockamamie. Women do not have penises. Men do not menstruate or give birth. Try to keep up. And "mother" is neither pejorative nor offensive to males.

As I said, to the dismay of the bigots of LR...

Ah, yes, name-calling vs a substantive response. You've failed to demonstrate why what nearly everyone, nearly everywhere, nearly always believed, is bigoted. You are declaring, with zero substantiation, nearly every human being that ever lived to have been a bigot. What is far, far, far more likely is that your view on this matter is absurd. Prove this "democracy of the dead" - as Chesterton termed the majority opinion of the vast multitude of dead folks - to be wrong and your opinion - the zeitgeist of a tiny minority - to be correct. Good luck.

Occam wrote:

LOL...you are actually believing this made up story. No way this real. This is in line with the high school boys on Letsrun making up stories to seem relevant that are inline with Rojo's views.

Ding, winner. How did it take this long?

8/10, OP, plausible sounding enough to hook the easy prey.

Woke is a horrible, horrible joke wrote:

are you sure? wrote:

As I said, to the dismay of the bigots of LR...

Ah, yes, name-calling vs a substantive response. You've failed to demonstrate why what nearly everyone, nearly everywhere, nearly always believed, is bigoted. You are declaring, with zero substantiation, nearly every human being that ever lived to have been a bigot. What is far, far, far more likely is that your view on this matter is absurd. Prove this "democracy of the dead" - as Chesterton termed the majority opinion of the vast multitude of dead folks - to be wrong and your opinion - the zeitgeist of a tiny minority - to be correct. Good luck.

Hate and bigotry are wrong, even when they are the majority opinion. I'm not sure why this is even considered debatable.

The fact that you can't spell principal... Well never mind.

And you're right, no one cares, especially about jr high school XC.

3/10

are you sure? wrote:

rwoutdoors wrote:

This young man is a boy. Has been since kindergarten until this year. Apparently something has changed. I don't know what is going in the school. Is he identifying as a female and all that nonsense? So far no one in administration will discuss it.

Why does the administration need to discuss it? According to the individual, are they a boy or a girl?

Should I identify as a woman so that I can be an olympic champion and make a bunch of money? I'm faster than any woman on the planet, because I am a fast male. Just like this boy is a decently fast boy, so he is faster than all of the girls. He is ruining the competition. And if competition doesn't matter because it's 7th and 8th grade, then why do they have races? Just show up to practice and don't have races if the competition doesn't matter.... But wait, it does matter. That's why the sport exists is for some competition.

Did the event look something like this?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=URz-RYEOaig

Heather Swanson is an inspiration.

Switching to serious mode for a bit.

There's a couple of different ways this could break in our country. It's hard not to imagine an apocalypse for women's sports given what we see as the trend. People with testicles are tearing up women's sports at every level.

Maybe though we will stop being so impressed with athletic feats and recognize that they shouldn't be worshiped.

Probably yes wrote:

under a bridge wrote:

The OP's only other posting history is also complaining about trans women in sports. But everyone loves to believe and feed the troll about this issue with his "daughter".

or it it issues with her daughter... I didn't see anywhere in this thread where the OP identified as a male!

You are so gullible. But you aren’t alone in this thread.

"We were told by the principle that it should not be an issue as we were talking about 7th and 8th graders..."

She's got a pretty good point there.

are you sure? wrote:

Woke is a horrible, horrible joke wrote:

Ah, yes, name-calling vs a substantive response. You've failed to demonstrate why what nearly everyone, nearly everywhere, nearly always believed, is bigoted. You are declaring, with zero substantiation, nearly every human being that ever lived to have been a bigot. What is far, far, far more likely is that your view on this matter is absurd. Prove this "democracy of the dead" - as Chesterton termed the majority opinion of the vast multitude of dead folks - to be wrong and your opinion - the zeitgeist of a tiny minority - to be correct. Good luck.

Hate and bigotry are wrong, even when they are the majority opinion. I'm not sure why this is even considered debatable.

That's the problem: you are not debating. You are not arguing. You are asserting. You are committing the logical fallacy of "begging the question" - assuming your desired conclusion as your premise and, worse, then just asserting your premise. In this case, you are assuming that anyone who believes that (a person of one biological sex is not a person of the other sex) is a hater and a bigot.

I don't hate anybody. But I wonder how many men who emasculate themselves will want to revisit with you years from now and kick you in your nuts, even if you insist that your nuts are a vijajay.

Woke is a horrible, horrible joke wrote:

I don't hate anybody. But I wonder how many men who emasculate themselves will want to revisit with you years from now and kick you in your nuts, even if you insist that your nuts are a vijajay.

Who's got your nuts in a vise? You seem like you have issues.

He's frankly selfish for competing against girls. The adults are idiots for letting it happen.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

"We were told by the principle that it should not be an issue as we were talking about 7th and 8th graders..."

She's got a pretty good point there.

A good point to everyone except the middle school girls competing against the individual in question. 7th and 8th grade girls still want to finish first. Many of them train hard without the advantage of ten times the level of testosterone. They shouldn't have to adapt to someone else's psychosis.

Evidently someone never learned that the principal is your pal. The principle in question, however, remains the same: individuals with testicles should not be allowed to compete in girls sports.

joed|rt wrote:

Evidently someone never learned that the principal is your pal. The principle in question, however, remains the same: individuals with testicles should not be allowed to compete in girls sports.

Generally agree, but there might be a confused child involved here.

are you sure? wrote:

rwoutdoors wrote:

This young man is a boy. Has been since kindergarten until this year. Apparently something has changed. I don't know what is going in the school. Is he identifying as a female and all that nonsense? So far no one in administration will discuss it.

Why does the administration need to discuss it? According to the individual, are they a boy or a girl?

According to biology, I’m going to guess he’s a male and therefore benefiting from male physical advantages.

Whatever gender he wants to play dress-up as is irrelevant.

llort_vbo wrote:

joed|rt wrote:

Evidently someone never learned that the principal is your pal. The principle in question, however, remains the same: individuals with testicles should not be allowed to compete in girls sports.

Generally agree, but there might be a confused child involved here.

There can be confusion about how someone chooses to identify. There is no confusion about the presence of testes. Maybe instead of calling it the girls division, they should simply refer to it as the testicle free division if that would be more acceptable to you.