Armstronglivs wrote:
Shopping hour wrote:
You're not sure about much at all.
End of thread.
I was happy to end it saying I would continue on my self-directed journey, in light of your repeated and complete failure to provide any direction, given the many opportunities to guide my thinking into your direction. I gave you several chances to take control and you told me to find my own way then come back when I have found it.
But then I got trolled, again.
We end this thread pretty much where it started -- with you once again having shared your profound belief in mythologies based partly on scientific truths, like a cartoon caricature or a made for TV movie based on real events, and pretending that I failed to understand the "science" part when I ask you to find support for the mythology.
In fact, we've seemed to regress, since you initially seemed to indicate a connection between "scarcely breathing" and "powerful effect of EPO", arguing it for 14 pages with "RBCs deliver more oxygen with each breath", only then to deny you said it 14 pages later, then immediately reversing the denial, saying "it might suggest". Your best "science" support seems to be a science blog covering a cycling power and time to exhaustion study on amateurs who were not blinded, which didn't report changes in breathing (perhaps it was recorded in the study, but Ross's blog did not cover it), and an opinion paper arguing to legalize drugs like EPO.
I wonder what the Dewey decimal number is for Ross's blog.