Marlon Bascombe Coach of Lean.Strong.Fast Suspected of Cheating for BQ

You mean like saying you have XXXX # of vistors on your website and you really mean page views. That is lying. Right?

Where is your selective outrage.

Mr. T. wrote:

You mean like saying you have XXXX # of vistors on your website and you really mean page views. That is lying. Right?

Where is your selective outrage.

I see. So what you are saying is that Marlon Bascombe is a cheater. Gotcha. Thanks for posting.

Marlon Bascombe, question for you:

How do you even sleep at night?

doubler wrote:

Derek seems to think that he's been appointed some spokesperson for the cheating movement., he promoted an article to RW. My sources say that he went to RW not the other way around.

You don't have sources. You make something up - and just in case you are wrong, you can blame it on "sources".

Now go away.

http://i.imgur.com/TqPgJ5t.png

Comment?

Well, I spent a few (well, more than a few) hours going through the results this weekend. Pretty quickly, as I posted earlier, I found 27 "runners" who cheated their way into Boston.

I thought I'd get a hundred with no problem, but ended up with 79. Still a lot. There are still some that are probably still out there, but I'm pretty sure I got the majority.

Doubler, send me an email if you want the list and I'll send it to you.

Simon Pendergrass wrote:

Well, I spent a few (well, more than a few) hours going through the results this weekend. Pretty quickly, as I posted earlier, I found 27 "runners" who cheated their way into Boston.

I thought I'd get a hundred with no problem, but ended up with 79. Still a lot. There are still some that are probably still out there, but I'm pretty sure I got the majority.

Doubler, send me an email if you want the list and I'll send it to you.

100% sure that you are lying. I don't think you found a single name. You didn't even look.

come on man wrote:

Doubler's post today on his blog is about this guy without naming him. I think you're talking about the same person even though you have a different spelling and a different hometown.

Where did you hear about this without seeing Doubler's blog?

Odd coincidence.

We know he didn't add anything to his blog since he didn't immediately run over here and start a new thread on him - with a alias, of course.

Slownder Man wrote:

come on man wrote:

Doubler's post today on his blog is about this guy without naming him. I think you're talking about the same person even though you have a different spelling and a different hometown. .

We know he didn't add anything to his blog since he didn't immediately run over here and start a new thread on him - with a alias, of course.

Wut? Are you saying someone hacked into his blog and made up the story posted last night/this morning about the Green Bay/Nashville/Boston cheater guy?

What are you even talking about?

Simon Pendergrass wrote:

Well, I spent a few (well, more than a few) hours going through the results this weekend. Pretty quickly, as I posted earlier, I found 27 "runners" who cheated their way into Boston.

I thought I'd get a hundred with no problem, but ended up with 79. Still a lot. There are still some that are probably still out there, but I'm pretty sure I got the majority.

Doubler, send me an email if you want the list and I'll send it to you.

Wow is this dumb. His email is on his website. You want us to believe that you can do the research to find 79 marathon cheats but you can't find doubler's email. Makes sense. What actually makes sense, is if you had a list of cheats, you would just email it to him and explain how you found them, you would not post here. Maybe start your own blog. Do it. Post the link to your blog here once you've got up the results of all your research.

Simon Pendergrass wrote:

Well, I spent a few (well, more than a few) hours going through the results this weekend. Pretty quickly, as I posted earlier, I found 27 "runners" who cheated their way into Boston.

I thought I'd get a hundred with no problem, but ended up with 79. Still a lot. There are still some that are probably still out there, but I'm pretty sure I got the majority.

Doubler, send me an email if you want the list and I'll send it to you.

Just list the names here, it'll be OK we're known for our unbiased, unprejudiced, nonpartisan, neutral, nonjudgmental, nondiscriminatory; objective, dispassionate, tolerant, liberal, permissive, broad-minded

attitudes and are always receptive, amenable, flexible and open to suggestions, new ideas, etc,etc.

I could go on, but you get the picture.

Oh yeah, Marlon's a cheat.

PS Doubler's email address is on his site (bottom of page), just email them anyway and let him look/decide.

Check his NYRR results. He gets younger as he ages. After turning 39 in 2013, he starts 2014 as 33.

If he used his true age, he would had much easier BQ as he should be around 42 or 43 now.

http://web2.nyrrc.org/cgi-bin/htmlos.cgi/aes-programs/results/resultsarchive.htm

Thanks. Found it. Didn't know he had a blog.

how slow are you? wrote:

gracias wrote:

No thanks, doubler. I've got a race this weekend.

You would find the names yourself but you're too busy doing a 10k. On Saturday. How long does it take you to run a 10k? Unless a 10k also takes so much out of you that all day Saturday and Sunday all you can do is lay in bed sleeping?

If you want the names, figure it out yourself. Sounds like you have an entire weekend to figure out at least some of the names, if you actually care.

Simon Pendergrass - this is the first post you responded to (saying it was easy and that you checked and found cheats). Now you tell us you didn't know Doubler had a blog? Can you see what's wrong with that? (Hint: the post you responded to is about his blog and his methodology to find names).

so we should believe you? wrote:

Simon Pendergrass - this is the first post you responded to (saying it was easy and that you checked and found cheats). Now you tell us you didn't know Doubler had a blog? Can you see what's wrong with that? (Hint: the post you responded to is about his blog and his methodology to find names).

Trolling/lying 101 - get your story straight in your own mind first.

Plus basic logic - don't say "email me" with no clues as to what this would be, a giant BS flag.

so we should believe you? wrote:

how slow are you? wrote:

You would find the names yourself but you're too busy doing a 10k. On Saturday. How long does it take you to run a 10k? Unless a 10k also takes so much out of you that all day Saturday and Sunday all you can do is lay in bed sleeping?

If you want the names, figure it out yourself. Sounds like you have an entire weekend to figure out at least some of the names, if you actually care.

Simon Pendergrass - this is the first post you responded to (saying it was easy and that you checked and found cheats). Now you tell us you didn't know Doubler had a blog? Can you see what's wrong with that? (Hint: the post you responded to is about his blog and his methodology to find names).

Sorry, mate. I was responding to the post about finding cheaters. Never read the original one in the series. My apologies. I sent the list to the email address on the blog. Haven't heard back yet. Probably still digesting them and double checking. Thanks for clearing that up.

It's just a generic email address withgmail. Derek has a real one he hides.

Simon Pendergrass wrote:

so we should believe you? wrote:

Simon Pendergrass - this is the first post you responded to (saying it was easy and that you checked and found cheats). Now you tell us you didn't know Doubler had a blog? Can you see what's wrong with that? (Hint: the post you responded to is about his blog and his methodology to find names).

Sorry, mate. I was responding to the post about finding cheaters. Never read the original one in the series. My apologies. I sent the list to the email address on the blog. Haven't heard back yet. Probably still digesting them and double checking. Thanks for clearing that up.

You sent them to yourself?

Marlon, how do you sleep at night? You are a total fraud, bro.

Well said! But of course, Marlon is innocent. Missing a mat or two due to a technical glitch doesn't mean anything. Neither does speeding up after a couple of miles and slowing down at the end. I am sure all of us unprejudiced and permissive letsrunners do agree. Well, except maybe for Mr. ExpertRossiWatcher who has a history of being overly suspicious.

We're known for... wrote:

Just list the names here, it'll be OK we're known for our unbiased, unprejudiced, nonpartisan, neutral, nonjudgmental, nondiscriminatory; objective, dispassionate, tolerant, liberal, permissive, broad-minded

attitudes and are always receptive, amenable, flexible and open to suggestions, new ideas, etc,etc.

I could go on, but you get the picture.

Oh yeah, Marlon's a cheat.