newton confused wrote:
Is there less force being applied into the grass compared to pavement
Yes, because in the soft surface of the grass there is initially less mass opposing it. By the time the whole ground is opposing the descending foot, it has slowed to the point where less force is needed to stop it. To decelerate it nearly instantaneously requires a much greater force, and since the ground is nearly at rest relative to the runner, that ends up meaning lots of mass. It might be different if the grass was shot upwards out of a cannon though.
and that is why there less force applied back making the athlete travel slower?
NO. That has absolutely nothing to do with the lateral motion of the runner. You slow down only if a braking force results from your footstrike. Regardless of surface, there is no reason for this to happen as long as your form is good.
If you're going to belabor the mechanics of running, start with having your foot strike the ground at relative rest horizontally. And rather than imagining yourself pushing the ground backward, start throwing yourself forward in front of the planted foot. You're not a leg, you're leg with a body on top with arms and another leg attached to it.