The author pulled a troll job. He took a crappy novel he wrote, and disorganized it. The result is a Novelist TURD.
The author pulled a troll job. He took a crappy novel he wrote, and disorganized it. The result is a Novelist TURD.
Moby dick sucks wrote:
I will admit, even after several attempts, I’ve never been able to finish Moby Dick. I wonder if it gets better, but I can never get though the description of the various whales.
The reason Moby Dick is such a slog is that in the 1800s publishers wanted novelist to include other information in their books. Publishers want to sell books that offered more than one thing. In Moby Dick's case it is a novel, plus a very technical book about whaling. Other authors, like Jules Verne, did the same thing. And some famous novelists, like Victor Hugo, included historical information about the current events (the French Revolution) -- many people first learned about what transpired during the revolution by reading novels with historical facts added in.
gdm wrote:
sounds like Michael Crichton is more up your alley.
Fiction is for mentally weak people
[.[/quote]
Don't think I ever wrote that I didn't like the book. I liked it. But I just feel that some of the praise for the book is overblown.
.[/quote]
Overblown is a great description of the late, self-destructive and very fat David Foster Wallace.
So it goes.
As a result of this thread, I am going to read Moby Dick and be excessively disappointed.
this is a rare thread that does not go absolutely off the rails. im sure the subject matter has a lot to do with that.
Maybe your being sarcastic, if not then this book was way over your head. What a novel should be isn’t up to you. The fact that having read the book and now all you can think about is how you feel the book should have been easier to read and should have tied together Better is a fact you might want to reflect on. But you probably won’t.
I’m imagining a situation where you are giving this critique to DFW directly, he responds with a smirk.
Maybe next time you could just get to the point and call me an idiot.
This book deserves a proper review. I read it five times. This novel got everything, thank Foster, brilliant. I would say this, but not. This book must be read at least once in our life but it's too complex. For teenagers I would recommend something else. There are novels not so complex but you can find here, humor, adventure, sci-fi, romantic and so on. It's for entertainment but also serious topics. There are a lot of chapters but actually short once, even so, the vocabulary is easy and the illustrations give you a kind of orientation. Give it a try! You won't regret. Best regards.
wiseman007 wrote:
This book deserves a proper review. I read it five times. This novel got everything, thank Foster, brilliant. I would say this, but not. This book must be read at least once in our life but it's too complex. For teenagers I would recommend something else. There are novels not so complex but you can find here, humor, adventure, sci-fi, romantic and so on. It's for entertainment but also serious topics. There are a lot of chapters but actually short once, even so, the vocabulary is easy and the illustrations give you a kind of orientation. Give it a try! You won't regret. Best regards.
https://novelonlinefull.com
My friend was just looking for this information. Thanks