You seem to have a rather selective memory. Had you just said "you trolled about there being no evidence for her doping in Boston", I would have just dismissed it. But you said "A big red flag was rather that (Renato) continued to claim that Jeptoo was clean in Boston, despite evidence to the contrary. Ok rekrunner did that too..."
You accused me of claiming that "Jeptoo was clean in Boston", rather than "trolling about no evidence". Now it looks like a claim you no longer stand behind.
Saying a "straight lie" is another example of your brand of distorting reality. Here's how it played out: I said there was "no evidence", someone provided detailed evidence, and I said I hadn't seen that level of detail before, and admitted I was wrong about the IAAF providing some evidence regarding Boston. This is not something that can honestly be summarized as a "straight lie", but more an "honest mistake". But in typical fashion, you distort the truth.
casual obsever wrote:
In fact, you just agreed with me when saying ""about there being no evidence for her doping in Boston".
Lame try. I wrote "you trolled about there being no evidence for her doping in Boston".
I said "no evidence" that the "IAAF claimed that she was already doping for Boston"
Yes you did. And that was a straight lie. As per usual.