curiousrunner35 wrote:
The Starved Elephant wrote:
When have USC's men or women placed in cross? Oh wait, they don't even have teams. Does that make them terrible Track and Field programs?
Damn you shifted those goalposts real fucking quick. Where has Purdue's men place in track then? What about their women before this class came in?
Women won the Big Ten outdoor title last year. Men were 3rd as recently as 2016. Meanwhile, Kentucky's women were 6th at SEC outdoors this year. Are you gonna call them a terrible program?
As for "before this class came in", I don't know, but no one cares. They are obviously a very good team right now.
Nationals points are kind of a crapshoot. Ouside of the top 7 or 8, it really doesn't matter. Illinois men finished 20th this year after scoring 14 points, or, rather, after David Kendziera scored 14 points by himself. U of I got almost DFL at Big Tens, but they (Kendziera) finished above several Big Ten teams that are clearly better then them overall. Outside of the trophy teams, nationals points aren't a great way to judge the overall strength of programs.
What do you have against Purdue, anyway? You are heartlessly bashing them without any real justification. You clearly have some sort of vendetta.