mindweak wrote:
it almost gives me a headache to have to deal with how utterly f*cking stupid you are.
you saw what happened in the 5k at the trials right? the younger guys out kicked ruppy poop right? so your so f*cking dumb you think a super old Meb is supposed to beat the NOP golden child who joins the marathon at 31, and meb is 40? like come on....stop being so f*cking stupid, it kills me, like its almost as moronic as reading vent/calc***os rants
so when rupp is 41 and there is another NOP androgel rubdown with happy ending spoiled nike poster child brat who comes to the marathon at 31, and rupp loses guess what......people like you will STILL be making excuses for rupp
"but but but he is old, he still got bronze waaaaaaay back in rio, you cant knock his pr of 2:09:20 cause that was a hot tactical day, PRs dont mean anything only losers go for fast times, winners go for the win, and its only cause rupp is 41 thats why he didnt win, that new guy is lame he drafted off rupp and then pulled away the last mile, how lame, he should respect the GOAT"
rupp is slower than meb, and meb has better medals...and did it without the androgel rubdown with happy endings
You've successfully hijacked another Rupp thread and essentially started arguing with yourself now - that Chicago win must still REALLY burn for you. It will be ok I promise.
And there's a reason these B list Africans don't run the major races - they can't compete. It's really not hard to figure out.
And to the guy who said this earlier:
"Rupp has had a better career than the entire field at Amsterdam COMBINED." Pretty much spot on....