Animals don't have Eclipse Sunglasses. Will they all go BLIND Monday???

God is not a "He."

thejeff wrote:

Darwinning wrote:

Why are you ignoring the second verse in ch. 9?

Why are you ignoring there was no death and bloodshed before the fall?

Yes, very disingenuous indeed; the consummate bible verse picker variety, ignoring everything that rejects whatever strange premise you choose to make up and contribute to the bible, even when that same bible blatantly states the opposite.

Holy crap, dude.

Stay with me here. Just because he gave Noah animals and Adam plants, if that is the correct interpretation, doesn't mean there were no carnivores in the meantime.

There are intelligent debates to be had about the Bible, but trying to insert contradiction where none exists is amateurish and sad.

Monte Thh wrote:

God is not a "He."

thejeff wrote:

Holy crap, dude.

Stay with me here. Just because he gave Noah animals and Adam plants, if that is the correct interpretation, doesn't mean there were no carnivores in the meantime.

There are intelligent debates to be had about the Bible, but trying to insert contradiction where none exists is amateurish and sad.

God is most definitely a "He". Just look at the evidence:

Have you no eyes, man?

Doesn't that Nursery rhyme start with Our Father? That seems male.

Were they all screwed up about gender and sex even back then?

failed Sunday School wrote:

Doesn't that Nursery rhyme start with Our Father? That seems male.

Were they all screwed up about gender and sex even back then?

So, nursery rhymes are now considered as evidence?

Hunka He Man wrote:

failed Sunday School wrote:

Doesn't that Nursery rhyme start with Our Father? That seems male.

Were they all screwed up about gender and sex even back then?

So, nursery rhymes are now considered as evidence?

Why not? The whole book of fables is, no?

Failed Sunday School wrote:

Hunka He Man wrote:

So, nursery rhymes are now considered as evidence?

Why not? The whole book of fables is, no?

Not in my book. I already presented REAL evidence.

Animals didn't go blind during or following this eclipse, because they're smarter than the guy you voted in as our president.

They didn't look directly at the sun.

Hunka He Man wrote:

Not in my book. I already presented REAL evidence.

Do you have a link to the gender test?

Your Fajah wrote:

Hunka He Man wrote:

Not in my book. I already presented REAL evidence.

Do you have a link to the gender test?

Already posted. You understand it? . . . You fail the gender test.

Typo Correction

Already posted. You DON'T understand it? . . . You fail the gender test.

Hunka He Man wrote:

Typo Correction

Already posted. You DON'T understand it? . . . You fail the gender test.

Didn't read it. I didn't have to take a gender test for myself. Seemed pretty obvious.

Monte Thh wrote:

God is not a "He."

thejeff wrote:

Holy crap, dude.

Stay with me here. Just because he gave Noah animals and Adam plants, if that is the correct interpretation, doesn't mean there were no carnivores in the meantime.

There are intelligent debates to be had about the Bible, but trying to insert contradiction where none exists is amateurish and sad.

Go on.

thejeff wrote:

Monte Thh wrote:

God is not a "He."

Go on.

The entire notion of a gender for a supreme being is absurd.

Hey, what ever happened to Darloser?

Come on back, dude. We enjoyed watching you get the sh!t kicked out of you from so many angles.

Come on back!