Shouldn't the SJW riot and tear down Planned Parenthood because Margeret Sanger was a racist?

To go further, a question was posed earlier, that has comically been avoided...

If white conservative Christians are so racist, then why do many fight for the right of millions of black children to be born?

Liberals support eugenics-praising presidential candidates. Liberals are in deep contrast to many beliefs among black Americans. And liberals support the aborting of black babies, which is in contrast to many white conservative Christians.

Quite the web of contradiction.

correct, boring answer wrote:

You are trying to paint every person on the left as having the same beliefs and then pointing out hypocrisy by saying this person on the left doesn't agree with that person on the left. That's incredibly lazy.

Ironic statement.

Sanger wasn't a racist. This is a lie that has been trumpeted by right wingers who have quoted Sanger out of context. The line that is repeated as evidence that Sanger was racist was from a letter to African American ministers seeking to expand birth control access in the African American community:

"We don’t want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs."

People quote the first have of the sentence as evidence that the purpose of birth control for Sanger was to reduce the African American population. But in context, she is clearly saying that she wants to work with African American ministers to dispel fears in the community that providing women with access to birth control was really just a secret plot to destroy the African American community.

Sanger opposed racial segregation and made providing family planning to the African American community a priority because she saw how white communities had good access to family planning and benefited from being able to control how many children were in their family so they were not overburdened economically. Martin Luther King praised Sanger posthumously for her work in the African American community.

Sanger's only sin was buying into a very mainstream version of eugenics. She did not see eugenics as a way of producing a master race. She did believe that family planning would help produce a better population by eliminating children who were brought into families that were irresponsible and unable to properly care for their children. She actually equated these irresponsible people with those who followed the strict anti-birth control teachings of the church than any particular race.

analogy angles wrote:

correct, boring answer wrote:

You are trying to paint every person on the left as having the same beliefs and then pointing out hypocrisy by saying this person on the left doesn't agree with that person on the left. That's incredibly lazy.

Ironic statement.

It would only be ironic if I was painting everyone on the right as having the same beliefs. Show me where I have done that.

exthrower wrote:

The US also has around 50 buildings named after an infamous KKK leader who was a prominent Democratic congressman....Senator Byrd......

Perhaps they will all be torn down tonight.

correct, boring answer wrote:

analogy angles wrote:

Ironic statement.

It would only be ironic if I was painting everyone on the right as having the same beliefs. Show me where I have done that.

I never implied that YOU did that. I merely stated that it was an ironic statement that is based on a lot of current societal irrationality.

Do you not believe that many liberals are painting a picture of "everyone" on the right as having the same beliefs?

analogy angles wrote:

correct, boring answer wrote:

It would only be ironic if I was painting everyone on the right as having the same beliefs. Show me where I have done that.

I never implied that YOU did that. I merely stated that it was an ironic statement that is based on a lot of current societal irrationality.

Do you not believe that many liberals are painting a picture of "everyone" on the right as having the same beliefs?

Some certainly are. Trying to quantify it is pointless, I only ask that you not fall into the same lazy trap, just as I would tell those liberals that not all conservatives are KKK supporters.

And again we've strayed off the topic - the OP's analogy was poor.

correct, boring answer wrote:

analogy angles wrote:

I never implied that YOU did that. I merely stated that it was an ironic statement that is based on a lot of current societal irrationality.

Do you not believe that many liberals are painting a picture of "everyone" on the right as having the same beliefs?

Some certainly are. Trying to quantify it is pointless, I only ask that you not fall into the same lazy trap, just as I would tell those liberals that not all conservatives are KKK supporters.

And again we've strayed off the topic - the OP's analogy was poor.

The OP's analogy is dead on right, and Trump was right to ask where this cultural purge ends. The left regularly attacks the legacy of Washington and Jefferson as slave holders, even though they did great things, so why wouldn't they also attack Sanger for not only being a racist, but putting in place a GENOCIDAL program to reduce the number of black people!?

Sanger should be at the top of the list of hated racists, and the organization she built should be condemned for it's genocidal mission. Tear them all down and wipe Margaret Sanger's name from the history books.

The OP scores big time.

No, what you don't understand is that there are multiple motivations for the statue being taken down, and you're being lazy by thinking that it is only being taken down because "X confederate" was racist. Further, it's an individual vs. an organization founded by an individual, which is also not analogous.

Be better, Gary.

SJW hypocrites wrote:

and wanted to kill black babies?

This was a stupid idea when Mark Levin said it last night and it is still stupid when you thought you were clever posting it.

correct, boring answer wrote:

...

No, what you don't understand is that there are multiple motivations for the statue being taken down, and you're being lazy by thinking that it is only being taken down because "X confederate" was racist. Further, it's an individual vs. an organization founded by an individual, which is also not analogous.

Be better, Gary.

Man that was weak. Just admit you are defeated and go away.

DiscoGary wrote:

correct, boring answer wrote:

...

No, what you don't understand is that there are multiple motivations for the statue being taken down, and you're being lazy by thinking that it is only being taken down because "X confederate" was racist. Further, it's an individual vs. an organization founded by an individual, which is also not analogous.

Be better, Gary.

Man that was weak. Just admit you are defeated and go away.

You're better than that.

correct, boring answer wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Man that was weak. Just admit you are defeated and go away.

You're better than that.

... and apparently you are not.

spade detector wrote:

Right wing logic: "Obama was a terrible president - look how divided our country is! Hey! Don't you tear down that statue honoring a general who fought to divide this country!!"

Lol, gold!

The party party wrote:

spade detector wrote:

Right wing logic: "Obama was a terrible president - look how divided our country is! Hey! Don't you tear down that statue honoring a general who fought to divide this country!!"

Lol, gold!

Left wing logic: "be open-minded, and accept differing viewpoints! We're all different! But don't you disagree with me, you racist/bigot/fascist!"

spade destroyer wrote:

The party party wrote:

Lol, gold!

Left wing logic: "be open-minded, and accept differing viewpoints! We're all different! But don't you disagree with me, you racist/bigot/fascist!"

I will not meet your intolerance with tolerance 😘

You fail to recognize your own hypocrisy. You are the epitome of delusional.