Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

person who agrees..... wrote:

The only reason I think BB has a chance to defeat Trump is that he has all that money to run a campaign... plus he has the burning desire to put trump back in his place. And I honestly think trump is intimidated by him.

Biden doesn't have the money or support to beat trump.

I'd add that Bberg is really really good at politics and organization. He is light years ahead of the lame Dem politics being done outside his campaign. Bringing some of that higher level stuff will help fight trump.

Just look at his ads - really good and he's figured out how to attack trump.

bump

agip wrote:

Will Bberg be brave enough tonight to face down the forces of wokeness?

https://twitter.com/jaynordlinger/status/1230142827042156546?s=20

bump

Sally Vix wrote:

L L wrote:

It's not like Trump ever bragged that he was the reason that the stock market was high.

So why should he take any blame if it goes down?

The Corona virus is affecting the whole Earth. Why would he blamed for this? It might be a pandemic in Asia but largely contained here. Maybe give him credit for containing it here? Yes?

The good economy and the market rise was due to a good global economy that began its long sustained greatness in March 2009 and had nothing to do with Trump. All the smart people here know that, but Trump and you Trumpers get ripped on because he and you have been gloating about the stock market, giving him full credit for it. When you do that, you must also take the blame when it goes down.

And, you are celebrating way too early if you think Trump has contained anything. The only thing he has managed to contain so far is his fat ass from falling out of his pants, but don't hold your breath on that. You really are an ignoramus for believing Trump has the ability to do anything good. When Americans start to die within our borders from this virus, are you going to blame Trump then for not containing it? Don't answer because I don't give a sh!t what you think. Just look in the mirror and answer that to yourself.

Dump Trump wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The Corona virus is affecting the whole Earth. Why would he blamed for this?

-5/10

Don't be mistaken like others here that Sally is any bit of a troll. Sally is just stupid. So very very stupid.

1100 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

You are a fool if you don't buy now. A big-time fool. The Corona Virus will be short-lived. The 10% drop or 14% is short-lived. This is the best buying opportunity in the last 5 years.

INCORRECT!

For roughly 50 of the last 60 months (5 years) the markets have been lower than they are today. By definition all of those 50 months were better buying opportunities than today.

You are correct that Sally is indeed very wrong about the market. Once again, he spouts off about a subject he knows nothing about. He also doesn't know that Coronavirus is one word, but why oh why would he know that? It is exhausting reading the nonsense that comes from Sally. Constant BS nonsense. This thread, and all its topics, is beyond him.

P wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Correction: 20% snow loss in the NE peninsula. Nothing minor or reassuring about that. An iceberg the size of Malta was filmed breaking away from the ice-sheet. Scientists spoke in dire terms about the accelerated melting of the continent's ice as a result of the dramatic recent increase in temperatures as a result of climate change.

I am not interested in reassuring you. Just suggesting that we stick with reality when trying to make a point.

Cheers

If you want to stick with reality then you should watch the entire item. Antarctic ice is melting at an unprecedented rate because of climate change. Too complex for you to grasp? Or offends your partiality to climate change denial?

Sally Vix wrote:

L L wrote:

It's not like Trump ever bragged that he was the reason that the stock market was high.

So why should he take any blame if it goes down?

The Corona virus is affecting the whole Earth. Why would he blamed for this? It might be a pandemic in Asia but largely contained here. Maybe give him credit for containing it here? Yes?

He hasn't contained it. Public health officials have said its spread is inevitable.

Sally Vix wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Few are saying buy the dip. most wonder where the bottom is.

You are a fool if you don't buy now. A big-time fool. The Corona Virus will be short-lived. The 10% drop or 14% is short-lived. This is the best buying opportunity in the last 5 years.

Quite a few of your fellow citizens will be short-lived. That you can be more certain of than any "buying opportunity".

jesseriley wrote:

To some extent, I agree. Bernie has powerful enemies.

He did get a glowing endorsement from the Cuban government. Haha!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

He [TRUMP] did get a glowing endorsement from the RUSSIAN government. Haha!

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/maxseddon/putin-endorses-donald-trump-for-president

More reasons not to vote for Sanders.

A vote for Bernie puts Trump back in the White House.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/27/politics/sanders-trump-2020-general/index.html

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

To some extent, I agree. Bernie has powerful enemies.

He did get a glowing endorsement from the Cuban government. Haha!

http://www.granma.cu/mundo/2020-02-25/bernie-sanders-reconoce-los-aportes-de-cuba-en-educacion-y-salud

So Bernie says even a Cuban literacy campaign is a good thing - because literacy is a good thing - and this provokes outrage. Because Cuba is bad. But is a literacy campaign in the US any better, in a country built on over 300 years of slavery? Does every action of any government or state have to be measured against everything else it has done - good or bad? If so, the US is in no position to condemn anyone. The criticism of Bernie here is a dumb kneejerk response - that everything about Cuba has to be condemned. Yet the damage wrought by the US on the world - and often its own people - has been far greater.

Armstronglivs wrote:

P wrote:

I am not interested in reassuring you. Just suggesting that we stick with reality when trying to make a point.

Cheers

If you want to stick with reality then you should watch the entire item. Antarctic ice is melting at an unprecedented rate because of climate change. Too complex for you to grasp? Or offends your partiality to climate change denial?

1) Please show me where I said that "Antarctic ice is NOT melting at an unprecedented rate because of climate change."

Can't do it? Perhaps because I never made such a claim.

2) Now go ahead and show me where I have ever denied climate change.

Can't do that either?

Look dude, you've been shown to be a fool. Repeatedly. Take the gracious way out and just stop posting nonsense.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

He did get a glowing endorsement from the Cuban government. Haha!

http://www.granma.cu/mundo/2020-02-25/bernie-sanders-reconoce-los-aportes-de-cuba-en-educacion-y-salud

So Bernie says even a Cuban literacy campaign is a good thing - because literacy is a good thing - and this provokes outrage. Because Cuba is bad. But is a literacy campaign in the US any better, in a country built on over 300 years of slavery? Does every action of any government or state have to be measured against everything else it has done - good or bad? If so, the US is in no position to condemn anyone. The criticism of Bernie here is a dumb kneejerk response - that everything about Cuba has to be condemned. Yet the damage wrought by the US on the world - and often its own people - has been far greater.

Murder illiterate political dissidents.

Viola

Literacy rate automatically goes up.

In all seriousness, go read up on the purpose of the Literacy Campaign and then get back to me.

Yosinglercz wrote:

More reasons not to vote for Sanders.

A vote for Bernie puts Trump back in the White House.

^ Trump fear mongering propaganda.

Trump is counting on people NOT voting if Sanders runs as his way of winning. If people vote ignore the socialist/communist right-wing screamfest then Sanders trounces Trump.

Dump Trump wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

More reasons not to vote for Sanders.

A vote for Bernie puts Trump back in the White House.

^ Trump fear mongering propaganda.

Trump is counting on people NOT voting if Sanders runs as his way of winning. If people vote ignore the socialist/communist right-wing screamfest then Sanders trounces Trump.

Yeah. You obviously didn’t read the article.

Next.

moderates suck wrote:

agip wrote:

Will Bberg be brave enough tonight to face down the forces of wokeness?

https://twitter.com/jaynordlinger/status/1230142827042156546?s=20

bump

It’s too late for him - the Nevada debate was his first and lasting impression. I have no idea why he wasn’t more prepared than he was, and why despite the amazing ads and strong organization, he still tries too much to be a politician when he’s on stage. I agree with what Yang said, BB is like a rich movie director who pays great artists but feels the need to play an acting role in his movie. He was fine just backing the other horses, and I’m sure that’s what he will continue to do. I guess he played well into Bernie’s results though and served as a distraction when they all should have been gunning for Sanders.

P wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

If you want to stick with reality then you should watch the entire item. Antarctic ice is melting at an unprecedented rate because of climate change. Too complex for you to grasp? Or offends your partiality to climate change denial?

1) Please show me where I said that "Antarctic ice is NOT melting at an unprecedented rate because of climate change."

Can't do it? Perhaps because I never made such a claim.

2) Now go ahead and show me where I have ever denied climate change.

Can't do that either?

Look dude, you've been shown to be a fool. Repeatedly. Take the gracious way out and just stop posting nonsense.

So the report is nonsense? Or are you just a pompous little pedant because who thinks that an acknowledged misquotation from the report is the only thing that matters? Apparently.

So, to go to the point of the report itself, do you accept what it says?

Yosinglercz wrote:

Dump Trump wrote:

^ Trump fear mongering propaganda.

Trump is counting on people NOT voting if Sanders runs as his way of winning. If people vote ignore the socialist/communist right-wing screamfest then Sanders trounces Trump.

Yeah. You obviously didn’t read the article.

Next.

If Bernie runs away with this, rest assured trump is going to Find a way to disgust and anger that many more young libs and fire them up to vote. If he taps into even a small portion of those new young voters it is game over for trump. Bernie has been increasing consistent at mobilizing the youngsters. He’s finding a new piece of the pie, while trump merely tries to keep what he had before. Goddamn it would be glorious to watch Bernie of all candidates ruin him.