Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Past Presidents have punted on Chinese trade abuse for decades and guess what, Chinese GDP was through the roof and they were building their military with our money. Finally, Trump stands up to them. We cannot go back to business as usual with China because that is exactly what will happen if a democrat wins in 2020 except for Bernie (he has been a critic of Chinese unfair trade practices).

Trump will play the long game. Chinese GDP will take a hit and their currency will probably start to downtrend.

Mueller never

Lying

r

Just as long as you understand that these tariffs are a tax, paid by Americans to finance Trump's policy, fine. But if you try to pretend the Chinese pay the tariffs, we got a problem.

Fat hurts wrote:

Believer in Christ wrote:

Wrong, there are over 25 references to the AntiChrist in the Bible. John in Revelation 17: 10-11 talked about 7 kings, 5 of which were already "fallen" or dead. Plus, the one he was living under (most likely Nero) and the future one. There were past AntiChrist like figures in history, but the one that will rule during the Tribulation has not yet appeared. Are you denying the future 7 year Tribulation too?

You are making non biblical claims here.

Dude, you are saying that words are there when they are not. You posted a bunch of verses that did not contain the term "anti-christ". You are seeing things that are not there.

Fat hurts stop being dense and I'm being as respectful as possible. When there are passages in Scripture that mention the "man of sin", "son of perdition", "the beast", "man of lawlessness", these describe an extremy powerful man who opposes Christ and seeks to literally rule the world. That is the very definition of the AntiChrist who will persecute all Christians and demand worship as a deity.

You are the first Christian that I have encountered in over 35 years that denies that there will be an AntiChrist during the end times. If you were an atheist or non believer, then I would understand your position. I don't know what church or denomination you attend, but if your pastor is preaching this, I have to say he is not being true to the Word.

Believer in Christ wrote:

Asians wrote:

So, where did Asians come from. Are you claiming from the the Tower of Babel? Native Americans (North, South, and Central) too? Amazing stuff.

Did you know that the phrase "Tower of Babel" does not appear anywhere in the Bible?

According to the Biblical record in the book of Genesis, Shem is the original forefather of the Asian people.

How did Shem become an Asian? Magic?

investment wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I get what you are saying, but if she had a whole host of different mutual funds (as I do) invested in all kinds of different things and sectors, she still could have lost in the last week right on the same as just being in the Dow alone. Can't assume she was only in the Dow.

The probability she has a wide-range of investments that exactly match what the DOW does is very low. It is zero because she claimed knowing her loses was self-evident. She is entirely invested in something that is self-evident and exactly matches the decline in the DOW. That can only be the DOW.

You are making an assumption. I have noticed several times that over a given period that some funds of mine exactly matched the Dow. I suppose the best in people until they give me reason not to.

Mage Ick wrote:

Believer in Christ wrote:

According to the Biblical record in the book of Genesis, Shem is the original forefather of the Asian people.

How did Shem become an Asian? Magic?

Shem's "Asia" was land given to him by his father, Moses. That "Asia" was the lad around present day Israel. It was not China. And it was not Southeastern Asia. It could be called the Near East, but in those days there was no Far East.

Eat Drink Go wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

That is definitely not me. I am staying out of this debate. I have been preparing dinner. I might ask Flagpole over for a dinner party but will ensure it ends early so he can get back on time. I only post as those three and Living las vidas locas. Not Debbie Downer.

Make it quick. Flagpole’s dinner parties are 30 minutes or less.

You people are hilarious. The host has two young children as did one other couple that was there. We were there from 5 to 9. A good time was had by all.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

L L wrote:

Klobuchar would be Cory Booker's VP (or vice versa).

But again, Klobuchar has no charisma and does not inspire progressives.

I don't agree about Klobuchar; she comes across as likeable and intelligent and the majority of democrats want a moderate that beat Trump. Once the debates start, she will quickly move up in the polls. At the same time people will be reminded of the fact that Biden is a goofball who dropped out of the 2008 race after receiving less than 1% of the Iowa caucus votes.

She may be a bit likable and certainly intelligent.

Some may want a moderate to beat Trump.

But I said she doesn’t inspire progressives and she doesn’t. And she does not have charisma.

It will be hard for her to get the nomination with progressives whipped in a frenzy.

I agree there is plenty of time for Biden to say dumb things and blow it.

But juxtaposed to Trump, what could he say that would look that bad?

investment wrote:

Pointing it out again wrote:

Your posts would not even be interesting if they were correct. They are worse because they are INCORRECT!

Please learn to read and comprehend before making a total ass out of yourself again.

It is quite elementary to see that you are WRONG!

1) Nowhere did said individual say that their returns exactly matched the Dow.

2) FP, NOT said individual, estimated the size of said individual's portfolio based on the stated losses of said individual.

3) From FP's estimate of said individual's portfolio size (based on the returns of the Dow and the $ return of said individual) YOU have concluded that said individual is 100% invested in the Dow.

4) Have you ever heard of the concept of assuming your conclusion? FP ASSUMED that said individual realized a return equal to the Dow's, from which YOU CONCLUDED that said individual must be 100% invested in the Dow.

5) Please do update us when it occurs to you how utterly moronic (and WRONG) your posts have been.

6) Naturally, without such an update from you, we will be forced to conclude that you are simply too stupid to realize how idiotic your ERROR was even after it was pointed out to you in gruesome detail.

I love you and I will pray for you.

Good for Rosenstein. It shows how completely illegitimate and one sided Hillary and President Trump’s investigation came to be.

Democrats continue to lose!

Debbie DOWner wrote:

The Man and The Legend wrote:

Humble brag ^

Good job!

No. A humble brag would have mentioned that my real estate holdings are doing very well. Gotta love a hot market and eager developers.

INCORRECT!

Don't bother trying again. It is clear that your grasp of the English language is insufficient for you to post something that is correct.

That’s it, deny everything. The few, the proud, the trumpers.

Asians wrote:

Did you know that the phrase "Tower of Babel" does not appear anywhere in the Bible?

So?

The Bible tells the story of a place referred to as "Babel" where the citizens attempted to construct a tower to reach to the heavens. But you think that the exact phrase "Tower of Babel" not being used is significant?

Really?

investment wrote:

Debbie DOWner wrote:

Good Lord are you thick.

You don’t even know what my investment level is.

You really are stupid. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SAID that is was obvious to figure out your total investments from the percentage drop of the DOW.

So, ignorant girl, explain how your non-DOW investments just happen to match the DOW drop. Poor investment strategies? Voodoo? Magic?

No. I stated how much I had “lost” during the last week. SMH

Personally, I’m going with Voodoo though.

what is asia? wrote:

Mage Ick wrote:

How did Shem become an Asian? Magic?

Shem's "Asia" was land given to him by his father, Moses. That "Asia" was the lad around present day Israel. It was not China. And it was not Southeastern Asia. It could be called the Near East, but in those days there was no Far East.

Moses? Noah was Shem's father.

Debbie DOWner wrote:

investment wrote:

You really are stupid. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO SAID that is was obvious to figure out your total investments from the percentage drop of the DOW.

So, ignorant girl, explain how your non-DOW investments just happen to match the DOW drop. Poor investment strategies? Voodoo? Magic?

No. I stated how much I had “lost” during the last week. SMH

Personally, I’m going with Voodoo though.

Every single one of you plebeians is WRONG!

It's not a lose until you f*cking sell.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

Good for Rosenstein. It shows how completely illegitimate and one sided Hillary and President Trump’s investigation came to be.

Democrats continue to lose!

So . . . Comey implied "that Rosenstein and Attorney General Bill Barr lacked the 'inner strength' to 'resist the compromises necessary to survive Mr. Trump.'" and also "derided Rosenstein's 'character' and suggested his 'soul' had been consumed 'in small bites.'" . . . and Rosenstein blasted Comey after this. And this strikes you as significant?

How old are you? I only ask because most people above the age of 12 would see this as perhaps good, albeit low class, entertainment (the male equivalent of a cat fight) but not exactly newsworthy.

Racket wrote:

Debbie DOWner wrote:

No. I stated how much I had “lost” during the last week. SMH

Personally, I’m going with Voodoo though.

Every single one of you plebeians is WRONG!

It's not a lose until you f*cking sell.

I assume you meant "loss."

More importantly, your claim has been definitively proven to be FALSE here on these very boards by Bigfoot (again and again and . . . )

Believer in Christ wrote:

what is asia? wrote:

Shem's "Asia" was land given to him by his father, Moses. That "Asia" was the lad around present day Israel. It was not China. And it was not Southeastern Asia. It could be called the Near East, but in those days there was no Far East.

Moses? Noah was Shem's father.

So, you cannot answer the question you were asked. Figures.

Answer this much easier question: Where did the wives of Adam and Eve's sons come from? Eve was only woman available. Adam and Eve supposedly had some daughters, but the Bible says little about them. Either way, Eve or their sisters who were the wives of the sons? Did other women appear by Magic?

what is China? wrote:

Believer in Christ wrote:

Moses? Noah was Shem's father.

So, you cannot answer the question you were asked. Figures.

Answer this much easier question: Where did the wives of Adam and Eve's sons come from? Eve was only woman available. Adam and Eve supposedly had some daughters, but the Bible says little about them. Either way, Eve or their sisters who were the wives of the sons? Did other women appear by Magic?

Your "profound" question is not exactly clever rhetoric. Adam and Eve appeared "by Magic." Introducing the notion that other women would have had to "appear by Magic" introduces no new challenge to the overall narrative.

Care to try again?