PAC 12 dad:
You are correct in that the PAC went to guaranteed scholarships, but it does not say it has to be at the same level. There is one particular PAC12 program that does reduce the scholarship, but the athlete does not lose all of it. And another PAC 12 team did not renew the scholarship of an athlete. This is 100% true as I'm a collegiate coach and the young man is on our team.
chiraq. wrote:
This is a case of, Daddy over trained us. Still don't see how NC state allowed that coaching arrangement. The Fraizer sister don't even practice with the team.
blargy wrote:Is this another case of daddy ruined me?
You would be amazed at how much top programs can cater to primadonna athletes. They'd really rather just not lose them.
I don't know what he situation is now, but that how things worked at USC for years. They got all those superstar athletes, then let them train with whoever they liked. Funny thing was that it made sense- these kids were all products of major high school programs and the club track system, and many were running NCAA-scoring times as high school athletes. I guess if it aint broke, dont fix it.
Sammy Seems.... wrote:
Check your conference rules. At least one P5 conference has gone to 4 year deals that can't be cut or reduced.
"At least one" a.k.a. "one" lol
the correct answer to the original question is....Do your homework.
Megan Keith (14:43) DESTROYS Parker Valby's 5000 PB in Shanghai
2024 Boston marathon - The first non-carbon assisted finisher ran..... 2:34
Official Suzhou Diamond League Discussion Thread (7-9 am ET+ Instant Reaction show at 9:05 am ET)
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday