Cowboy shootout wrote:
............ wrote:Surprised nobody mentioned Berkeley. Top 3 Engineering programs in the country, ranked #1 public university in the world, and not a great team
Top public U in the country, yet 7th at Pac12s last year sandwiched between academic powerhouses Arizona State and Washington State. With one guy in the top 20. That's gotta be the biggest disparity out there.
The crazy thing is as one poster mentioned, you have to be a 1:53/4:14/9:15 guy to even get a look....but then you go nowhere or regress for 4 years. How you start with the talent yet do nothing is mind-boggling.
The OP question was "which D1 school has excellent academics and a bad team."
So, automatically, ever Pac-12 school is not eligible, because even the worst XC programs are decent on a national level. So it has to be a SEC or ACC school. Aside from Vanderbilt and Auburn, the SEC is far from excellent in academics. Vanderbilt had an awful XC program for men and a decent one for women. Auburn was middle of the road in both men and womens. So Vanderbilt is definitely a contender.
Now let's move on to the ACC. Most ACC schools have excellent education, especially when compared to SEC schools. So they are all eligible. But Miami's XC program in mens and womens is absolutely awful, perhaps the worst in the country.
So now it is Vanderbilt vs. Miami. I don't know much about academics at either, but Vanderbilt is known to have the best academics in the SEC - but that is not difficult to achieve. Miami seems to be on the same level as the rest of the ACC - so I don't know how to lean here. But even if Vanderbilt had a "more excellent" of a school than Miami, Miami's XC program is so much worse, that Miami has to take the cake.
Miami sucks, so they win the OP's contest