I challenge anyone to logically defend this action: Feds Order High School To Allow Boys Who Dress As Gir

Chicagoland deserves this misguided decision.

Crime-ridden. Blows up baseballs to break up a supposed curse. In-your-face liberals for the sake of it- not for true causes.

Chicagoland wants to be crime-ridden liberal idiots?? There's the decision for you.

YesYesYes wrote:

Chicagoland deserves this misguided decision.

Crime-ridden. Blows up baseballs to break up a supposed curse. In-your-face liberals for the sake of it- not for true causes.

Chicagoland wants to be crime-ridden liberal idiots?? There's the decision for you.

Chicagoland parents & kids are praised for promoting individuality, be who you want to be, etc.. Here's your chance to practice what you preach in everyone's face. Go ahead- practice it.

The aim is for a more accepting and tolerant society. The fact that you b post this thread means it is still an issue to be dealt with. It isn't so much people with penises showering with people with vaginas as it is the thought of it. A woman showering in the men's locker room promotes no more of a threat to said woman or men then me showering with men whom I might have a physical attraction to. So the thought of it bothers people more than the act itself since I shower with men all the time and they don't seem to mind showing with me and in instances even looking took long. I don't expect to change your mind. Hell, you still consider the LGBT people as having a "lifestyle". Sorry for you Gary, it isn't the 1950s anymore. Thankfully society has progressed since then.

YesYesYes wrote:

YesYesYes wrote:

Chicagoland deserves this misguided decision.

Crime-ridden. Blows up baseballs to break up a supposed curse. In-your-face liberals for the sake of it- not for true causes.

Chicagoland wants to be crime-ridden liberal idiots?? There's the decision for you.

Chicagoland parents & kids are praised for promoting individuality, be who you want to be, etc.. Here's your chance to practice what you preach in everyone's face. Go ahead- practice it.

And yes, much of Chicagoland promotes transgender individuality (or other such things), in an in-your-face manner, being pressured to be politically correct.

I am not liberal, but have no issues with sincere liberals, even if I disagree.

People like you give liberals and LGBT people a BAD name. Keep it up.

Maybe someone should master$ate or a couple have sex in church. Then you can argue people need to be tolerant.

YesYesYes wrote:

YesYesYes wrote:

Chicagoland deserves this misguided decision.

Crime-ridden. Blows up baseballs to break up a supposed curse. In-your-face liberals for the sake of it- not for true causes.

Chicagoland wants to be crime-ridden liberal idiots?? There's the decision for you.

Chicagoland parents & kids are praised for promoting individuality, be who you want to be, etc.. Here's your chance to practice what you preach in everyone's face. Go ahead- practice it.

You think this is specific to Chicago? Do you understand the national precedent that this will set?

This sort of thing is coming to your school district next year. Forget the Intro to Comp. Sci. you wanted your daughter to take, that class on "community tolerance" just became mandatory. And forget about your school hiring that career-change engineer that wants to be a math teacher at your son's high school, the DOEdu is now mandating a diversity teacher and admin.

And don't worry, your kids will be just as competitive as those foreign, no-nonsense students...

Rampant liberalism is gutting the american middle class of this generation and the next.

How is there anythjng wrong with what i said? Liberals and the LGBT have a bad name? What about conservative and homophobes? Are those good names? Lol.

krispy kremlin_. wrote:

YesYesYes wrote:

Chicagoland parents & kids are praised for promoting individuality, be who you want to be, etc.. Here's your chance to practice what you preach in everyone's face. Go ahead- practice it.

You think this is specific to Chicago? Do you understand the national precedent that this will set?

This sort of thing is coming to your school district next year. Forget the Intro to Comp. Sci. you wanted your daughter to take, that class on "community tolerance" just became mandatory. And forget about your school hiring that career-change engineer that wants to be a math teacher at your son's high school, the DOEdu is now mandating a diversity teacher and admin.

And don't worry, your kids will be just as competitive as those foreign, no-nonsense students...

Rampant liberalism is gutting the american middle class of this generation and the next.

It's Chicagoland that made cross-dressing an issue in the first place. Then the federal level makes such a decision. Most areas wouldn't have even had it on the table for Federal to address.

Enjoy Chicagoland, you deserve it. Individuality with no boundaries, you say! No matter who it bothers!

YesYesYes wrote:

People like you give liberals and LGBT people a BAD name. Keep it up.

Maybe someone should master$ate or a couple have sex in church. Then you can argue people need to be tolerant.

Could you explain to me how showering or getting dressed in the same locker room equates to masturb&ting or having sex in church, both illegal acts for any persuasion?

Listen, I am a pretty tolerant person. I have no problems with gay or trans people, but I don't want my 14-year-old daughter showering with an 18-year-old penis next to her. You don't seem very tolerant of my concerns. It is a two-way street man, and just because we don't agree doesn't mean I am wrong. Or homophobic. Or a bigot. Or a racist. I just don't want my daughter having to shower next to a man's penis.

I mean, there are bigger problems in the world, but since the thread exists and we're discussing it....

Ted Underhill wrote:

YesYesYes wrote:

People like you give liberals and LGBT people a BAD name. Keep it up.

Maybe someone should master$ate or a couple have sex in church. Then you can argue people need to be tolerant.

Could you explain to me how showering or getting dressed in the same locker room equates to masturb&ting or having sex in church, both illegal acts for any persuasion?

Well, to be fair... it is currently illegal for a High School man to enter a High School woman's shower/locker room and remove his clothes.

Ted Underhill wrote:

YesYesYes wrote:

People like you give liberals and LGBT people a BAD name. Keep it up.

Maybe someone should master$ate or a couple have sex in church. Then you can argue people need to be tolerant.

Could you explain to me how showering or getting dressed in the same locker room equates to masturb&ting or having sex in church, both illegal acts for any persuasion?

An above post said a more tolerant society is justification. Well, in that case tolerate these acts too. I didn't bring up tolerance as justification.

Your 14 yo daughter wouldn't shower with an 18 yo. Let alone an 18 year old penis. She might shower with a 14 yo boy who happens to have a penis. If she doesn't want to do that (and she very well might want to) she can shower at home. That is a choice you and her could make. Why is your daughters comfort more important than that of a transgendered person?

Get used to it.. wrote:

Your 14 yo daughter wouldn't shower with an 18 yo. Let alone an 18 year old penis. She might shower with a 14 yo boy who happens to have a penis. If she doesn't want to do that (and she very well might want to) she can shower at home. That is a choice you and her could make. Why is your daughters comfort more important than that of a transgendered person?

Using YOUR argument: Someone's comfortable master$ating in public. Why is the public's comfort more important than his?

You stupid conservatives try to use the slippery slope arguments at the worst times. It really makes you look stupid. There are laws against public indeciency. There are no laws against co ed showers...next!

Get used to it.. wrote:

Your 14 yo daughter wouldn't shower with an 18 yo. Let alone an 18 year old penis. She might shower with a 14 yo boy who happens to have a penis. If she doesn't want to do that (and she very well might want to) she can shower at home. That is a choice you and her could make. Why is your daughters comfort more important than that of a transgendered person?

Well, you are making the comfort of the transgendered more important that the comfort of ALL the other kids.

This one persons rights do not supersede the right of anyone else.

You have to be the most intolerant poster on the thread.

Get used to it.. wrote:

You stupid conservatives try to use the slippery slope arguments at the worst times. It really makes you look stupid. There are laws against public indeciency. There are no laws against co ed showers...next!

Wrong.

According to Lambda Legal

-

"A transgender person should use the restroom that corresponds to his or her gender identity. (We are talking about a boy here, SO HE SHOULD USE THE BOYS ROOM).

"The medical community (and increasingly, employ-ers, schools and courts) now recognize that it is essential to the health and well-being of transgender people for them to be able to live in accordance with their ***internal gender*** identity in all aspects of life—restroom usage is a necessary part of that experience.

"In Doe v. Regional School Unit, the Maine Supreme Court held that a transgender girl had a right to use the women’s bathroom at school."

NEXT.

Seeker of Equality wrote:

You have to be the most intolerant poster on the thread.

Liberals have no idea how intolerant and prejudice and judgemental they are. They have had their beliefs reinforced at schools, on NPR, and by the current adminiatration.

Meanwhile, anyone with a different, opposing argument gets dismissed as, you guessed it, intolerant and prejudice and judgemental (and usually worse).

These people are monsters. And they need to be exposed for damage they wreck on society, culture and economics.