Why is it hot women are close to impossible to get in HS/College, difficult to get in mid to late 20s, but actually

"Let's face it, acquiescing women of any age are a mere mirage for the troglodytes that inhabit this virtual cesspool (and their unfortunate mother’s basement)."

Speaking from experience are you?

My wife took our daughter to college a few weeks ago. While stopping for gas, a carload of college dudes drove past, looked at her in those jeans and said "Damn!"

ljaljfd;kjlafdskjl wrote:

complete bullsh!t that women look better in late 20's than 22.

When women work for a couple of years, they join crossfit gyms and start wearing these "strong is the new skinny" t shirts. WHOOP DEE DOO Youre just trying to excuse why you've gained the workforce 15 on top of the freshman 15 you gained 5 years prior.

To the credit of the late 2o's honey in the strong is the new skinny t shirt, she is in better shape than the 200 pound women she works with but try pulling that act on a college campus.

Repulsed wrote:

Is it normal to be physically repulsed by 90% of women older than 30? I'm 40 straight male.

You are either lying about being straight, or you are highly narcissistic.

"My wife took our daughter to college a few weeks ago. While stopping for gas, a carload of college dudes drove past, looked at her in those jeans and said "Damn!""

About the daughter?

hey racehorse,

Lets see youre wife up there on a pole with a thong on and see how many tips she gets compared to your daughter.

women after 30 ESPECIALLY after kids...better dim the lights and fill the jeans

70%b of American females over 30 are overweight (>150 lbs at 5'4") and half of them are OBESE (>170 lbs at same height). So to start with, only 30% of women over 30 are in consideration for dating based on weight alone (for a runner with a BMI of 20, fat women are repulsive, as men should be for runner women, but looks/health aren't as primary a consideration among women).

I wouldn't consider 90% as "repulsive", but would likely be unsuitable for partners. The percentage of "unsuitable" for women below 30 is more like 70-80%.

70%b of American females over 30 are overweight (>150 lbs at 5'4") and half of them are OBESE (>170 lbs at same height). So to start with, only 30% of women over 30 are in consideration for dating based on weight alone (for a runner with a BMI of 20, fat women are repulsive, as men should be for runner women, but looks/health aren't as primary a consideration among women).

I wouldn't consider 90% as "repulsive", but would likely be unsuitable for partners. The percentage of "unsuitable" for women below 30 is more like 70-80%.

70%b of American females over 30 are overweight (>150 lbs at 5'4") and half of them are OBESE (>170 lbs at same height). So to start with, only 30% of women over 30 are in consideration for dating based on weight alone (for a runner with a BMI of 20, fat women are repulsive, as men should be for runner women, but looks/health aren't as primary a consideration among women).

I wouldn't consider 90% as "repulsive", but would likely be unsuitable for partners. The percentage of "unsuitable" for women below 30 is more like 70-80%.

Seems like some posters view women as widgets -- you can basically get the same intelligence or other intrinsic qualities in any one of them, so why not go for the younger ones. I just don't think this is true. When I was dating in my 40's after a divorce I wasn't looking for a certain age group, I was looking for an individual. I dated people both younger and older and met someone who I was physically attracted to and who had qualities that I admired, like intelligence, kindness, and a sense of humor. We clicked with similar interests. She was 4 yrs younger and we both were at the same stage in life, I.e., one of us wasn't looking to start a family while one was looking to travel or retire. But, it's good to be honest that if you're 30 or 40 and are not attracted to someone around your own age, then don't date someone your age. Those women your age would probably also not want to date you, since it would be miserable for them to date someone who only wanted to be with a much younger woman. Also, I see many women who are 30, 40 and older who are not overweight, especially in the running community. My spouse is a runner who has remained slim and in good shape -- and major bonus -- she's my best friend.

Men should not date more than 10 years younger. It's gross. Society doesn't need this.

"Men should not date more than 10 years younger. It's gross. Society doesn't need this."

So a 100 year old man shouldn't date an 89 year old woman?

What else is "gross" to you kid? black and white dating? "the gays" dating?

What makes you the authority on "gross" and what makes you the authority on what society needs?

What does society need oh Grand Pubah? more nitwits like you telling it what to do?

Fastttt wrote:

"My wife took our daughter to college a few weeks ago. While stopping for gas, a carload of college dudes drove past, looked at her in those jeans and said "Damn!""

About the daughter?

Daughter was in the car. Wife was filling the gas.

Racehorse wrote:

Fastttt wrote:

"My wife took our daughter to college a few weeks ago. While stopping for gas, a carload of college dudes drove past, looked at her in those jeans and said "Damn!""

About the daughter?

Daughter was in the car. Wife was filling the gas.

In their 20's, they think their poop don\'t stink until they have to reassess when they hit 30.

Just had my 20th HS reunion. When I was in HS, almost none of the attractive/desireable women would give me the time of day. I was probably mid-pack on looks and was one of the skinny runner guys of course back then.

At the reunion, a good number of the formerly popular girls that were now single (mostly divorced) were flirting with me as were a couple that had been pretty average but had blossomed later in life.

Myself, I am still pretty average but am physically fit. Definitely not that great in the looks department but not a couch potato like most men there.

I really was amused by how their attitudes had changed, and although I really wasn't attracted to them anymore I felt some redemption for being rejected by them in HS.

Funny thing was I had my pick of the litter and could have taken any one of them back to the hotel but like many here, 38 year old women don't really do it for me.

It is a projection / confidence thing. I waited tables part time in grad school and once I started working. Good looking crowd, mostly in their 20's. The week that I got engaged, women suddenly started hitting on me...like, shamelessly, all time time hitting on me. Note: I wasn't wearing the one wearing a ring; there were no outward signs of my engagement.

Maybe Satan temps young men aiming for God-glorifying monogamous relationships...

Maybe the best way to get something is to stop desiring it...

Maybe my aura changed...

Maybe being single in your 30's is more taboo as a female than as a male...

Maybe it has something to do with the non-matching times that males and females reach their "sexual peak"...

But, I would agree w the OPs claim.

The best way to get something is to stop desiring it....or at least letting the object of your desire THINK you no longer desire it. Drives a girl crazy when she thinks you don't find her hot. She will do anything to attract your attention to prove her hotness. So just politely ignore them and they'll be after you like flies on honey.

1. Be totally uncaring about the outcome.

2. Amuse yourself in her presence above all else.

3. Discover and engage on an unexpected commonality.

4. Slightly turn away...physically and metaphorically

5. Smile. Always smile. You have won The Game.