Obama's pathological lies

Are you like 10 T rex? All your postings so immature.

I actually agree with many of his points. No need to be a "white supremacists" - ahh, the convenient racist card liberals are always ready to pull out at a moment's notice - to know Obama is either incredible incompetent and/or a liar. He lied repeatedly about Benghazi when it came out in the hearings the WH knew in real time it had nothing to do with the video. He and Clinton owed the families of the victims the truth.

Again, Fast & Furious. Holder knew the weapons were being used against Americans, but again, the administration continued to lie and stonewall. Out of the 2000 guns the ATF sold to the Mexicans only a little over 700 have ever been recovered. The guns ended up being used to kill our own agents, not to mention being found at crime scenes in both Mexico and the U.S.

Obama again claimed ignorance about the IRS scandal. However, he met with the head of the IRS at the WH just about more than any other official. The WH claimed it was just rogue agents in Cincinnati, which agsin, was a complete lie. It went straight to the top and not only did they target conservative groups, but it was recently discovered Lois Lerner also illegally released their private information to the FEC.

Who can dispute Obama's foreign policy has been a disaster? Between Obama, Clinton, and now Kerry not only has nothing been accomplished, but our relationships even with our allies have deteriorated. Of course, part of this deterioration has to do with the NSA scandal. Again, Obama feigned ignorance. The man is attending - or should be attending - daily intelligence briefings. Of course, he knew what the NSA is doing.

Obamacare. He lied repeatedly - promised a $2500/year premium decrease, can keep your doctor and your hospital, and that the program would be budget neutral. All lies and his "war room" memos show he knew they were lies but continued them anyway. He has provided exemptions to many of his buddies to some of the harshest provisions of the plan - even announced yesterday while he said unions would get favors - big surprise, that has changed.

He has increased our national debt from 11 - 17 trillion dollars in only 5 years. So, I would call that spending and increasing the debt.

Your "racist" card argument is just a deflection from the fact Obama is a dismal failure. By the way, didn't Obama say one of his first priorities was to close Gitmo? How did that work out?

jethy wrote:

Breitbart ... LOL

brilliant reposte wrote:

What does that mean? Cat got your tongue?

Ha ha ... it means anyone who looks at Breitbart is a loonie! LOL

let's review: the poster, "and he's clueless" wrote facts of events that have transpired under Obama's watch. He spoke the truth, then provided his opinion. It is true that the mainstream media is liberal, and a mouthpiece for the president, I don't understand how you could disagree with that fact either. His final statement, his conjecture that any other POTUS would be removed from office after these events, while perhaps not the strongest argument made, is still a logical conclusion. Yet, instead of refuting anything (well, factual events that transpired can't be refuted), you resort to name calling, and insult his intelligence.

in 6 sentences you did the following:

-called him 4 different names that are not applicable

-sarcastically summed up his post with rants that don't make sense

-insinuated that he is racist

-could not develop a case for an alternative media outlet's views, yet draw a conclusion with no factual proof.

It's only going to get worse unfortunately.

As Flagpole correctly acknowledged, ALL presidents lie. It comes with the territory. However, Barry Soetoro does it with such alacrity, arrogance, and audacity that even Bob Woodward has jumped up to comment on many of the misdeeds of this administration, though he is out of the business of truly following up with true investigative journalism the way he used to. Obama doesn't deserve to be impeached, but he loves to shift blame or pretend like he didn't know about certain questionable practices and programs when he damn well should have known. He lacks leadership. He makes Clinton's "it depends on what the definition of the word is is" look remarkably lucid and sensible.

I will give him credit for being able to bullshit better than any of the presidents I've ever voted for in my lifetime.

Sagarin wrote:

As Flagpole correctly acknowledged, ALL presidents lie. It comes with the territory. However, Barry Soetoro does it with such alacrity, arrogance, and audacity that even Bob Woodward has jumped up to comment on many of the misdeeds of this administration, though he is out of the business of truly following up with true investigative journalism the way he used to. Obama doesn't deserve to be impeached, but he loves to shift blame or pretend like he didn't know about certain questionable practices and programs when he damn well should have known. He lacks leadership. He makes Clinton's "it depends on what the definition of the word is is" look remarkably lucid and sensible.

I will give him credit for being able to bullshit better than any of the presidents I've ever voted for in my lifetime.

Why doesn't he deserve to be impeached? His fraudulent selling of Obamacare is about as bad as it gets. He promised Americans that they would keep their insurance time and time again while knowing that that was not true. His credibility is shot - not that he ever had any.

Sally Vixxxens wrote:

Why doesn't he deserve to be impeached? His fraudulent selling of Obamacare is about as bad as it gets. He promised Americans that they would keep their insurance time and time again while knowing that that was not true. His credibility is shot - not that he ever had any.

He can say whatever he wants. It was Congress that passed the legislation, not Obama.

His stretching the truth isn't a whole lot different than his predecessor. Conservatives would do well to just step aside and let him fall on his own sword. The more they take Obama to task, the more they draw attention away from his incompetence and malfeasance and toward their "extremism." Democrats are already suffering and backpedaling on the Unaffordable Care Act.

jethy wrote:

Sally Vixxxens wrote:

Why doesn't he deserve to be impeached? His fraudulent selling of Obamacare is about as bad as it gets. He promised Americans that they would keep their insurance time and time again while knowing that that was not true. His credibility is shot - not that he ever had any.

He can say whatever he wants. It was Congress that passed the legislation, not Obama.

You mean ALL Democrats and NO Republicans that crammed through this byzantine legislation for Obama to sign, quite unlike the bipartisan Congressional vote to go into Iraq, incompetence in the intelligence community notwithstanding.

he won't be impeached, so I don't think a discussion on that is worth having.

I think obamacare and all the rest of barry's 'work' - massive debt, masive increase in govt regulation, massive increase in welfare/food stamps - are all symptoms of the real problem: Barack Obama truly feels rage against the very nation he's President of and he's on a mission to punish ( tradional/white) America for what he feels are historical injustices. Barry wants an America that is not a sole superpower. He's cut from the same cloth as so many black "leaders", who believe that America should 'pay' until the last penny..

The part that's amazing is that we have millions of Americans who support Obama because they actually believe in the validity of what they think is his ideology, i.e. 'fairness' and justice for the downtrodden. Wake up, people. Barry is not in it to take care of the poor & oppressed. Think this through..

Isn't it wonderful how the moderators nowadays allow these half-brained pseudopolitical rantings to sprawl all over the site? Back in the days when the brojos' godfather was in the White House things sure were different.

Oh well, it's actually quite interesting to be able to monitor how the current talking points are resonating with the ignorant knuckle draggers that form the GOP's voter base. For those Democrats who might have been worried that Republicans would heed Bobby Jindal's advice to stop being "the stupid party" let's just say they can all relax. That's not gonna happen.

Sagarin wrote:

You mean ALL Democrats and NO Republicans that crammed through this byzantine legislation for Obama to sign, quite unlike the bipartisan Congressional vote to go into Iraq, incompetence in the intelligence community notwithstanding.

Sagarin, can you share with us which version of the Constitution you're reading? In mine it talks about majorities in both chambers being required but it neglects to mention that laws also must have rightwing support. Must be an error...

Did I suggest that it needed rightwing support? I was merely pointing out the obvious. By the way, you're a couple million years off from knuckle-draggers. We have evolved into sentient human beings capable of self-flaggelation, guilt, and "good intentions." "Evolved, "progressive" liberals are paragons of these, ultimately, destructive attributes. But, I agree, the GOP keeps tripping over itself.

I can't wait for Obama to write a book on leadership:

Tell lies and not care about the repercussions

pass the buck

assume no responsibility

never blame yourself, blame others

throw subordinates under the bus

When caught in a lie, say, "I really meant this..."

Go into campaign mode whenever a crisis erupts

When all else fails, go play a round of golf

If Obama was the captain of the Titanic, he would never go down with the ship; he would be the first to flee like the coward that he is.

'not only does he lie' well, ok, fine. Every politician lies, so no points there. His lies to me seem far less awful than most presidents, considering they didn't kill anyone.

'most corrupt president of all time" hah. You lose credibility there. To my knowledge there has not been a single corruption case from this white house. That has to be a record for cleanliness and a welcome respite.

Benghazi: fine, but there are always attacks on US diplomatic bases/cia bases. The obama record is about the same as bush's

'barry informed us it was due to a video' - no, not really. he correctly said the attacks in egypt the prior day were in response to the video, but not benghazi.

Fast and furious: weird case - I have no strong view on it.

NSA: I'm with you there.

IRS targeting conservative groups: well ok. because they were clearly breaking the rules. I think it would have been corrupt NOT to investigate them. But anyway, not a white house issue.

Middle east on fie: huh? iraq war over, afghan war over, peace in israel, egypt sort of trundling on, nothing happenign in kurdistan price of oil down. Syria seems to be quieting down. Doesn't seem like 'on fire' to me. seems downright calming. relatively.

no foreign policy: well, I half agree. Obama's policy is to stop with the unilateral attacks. he is not a strong leader, tho, no. unclear how that will turn out.

syrian support to rebels: well ok. small arms and bullets. hardly a big deal really.

destroying healthcare: no

redistrib wealth: how? I don't see it. he's pretty republican on tax policy.

waiving obamacare for friends: source? unfamiliar with this.

promoting islamic brotherhood: how exactly?

amnesty: not happening

more spending and debt: yes, but he is the lowest spending pres in decades, arguably.

so. virtually nothing you say is true. you, my friend, are the liar, right? right?

dats da fact jack wrote:

If Obama was the captain of the Titanic, he would never go down with the ship; he would be the first to flee like the coward that he is.

Kinda like internet posters who insult someone anonymously?

It's very hard for lefties to accept the truth.