That article is 6 weeks old. Those predictions and forecasts are now irrelevant in the face of recent data. The "Nowcast" is really a "Thencast."
That article is 6 weeks old. Those predictions and forecasts are now irrelevant in the face of recent data. The "Nowcast" is really a "Thencast."
See the "Eye Doc" and get some glasses junior.
I was today's "Nowcast": Latest forecast: 0.9 percent — March 31, 2017
Read more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=5369837&page=918#ixzz4cumsrET3
I was referring to the article you posted dated Feb 17. Try to keep up.
Not me, get the glasses.
Different handle, same troll.
Different handle, same troll.
As more monthly source data becomes available, the GDPNow forecast for a particular quarter evolves and generally becomes more accurate. That said, the forecasting error can still be substantial just prior to the “advance†GDP estimate release. It is important to emphasize that the Atlanta Fed GDPNow forecast is a model projection not subject to judgmental adjustments. It is not an official forecast of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, its president, the Federal Reserve System, or the FOMC.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Different handle, same troll.
It was wise if you to not compound your lie.
"It was wise if you to not compound your lie."
Do you ever tire of you games? How many registered handles do you have now?
You are just a little insane.
Come on, Igy. Everybody knows that you're the troll.
Sorry to disappoint you Detector Dude. Your insanity is blind to many things, well beyond the simple, such as right and wrong.
So you don't use multiple handles?
(I won't hold my breath waiting for an honest answer. Cue the diversion.)
Flagpole wrote:
Judah wrote:It's nice to see Flagpole back on the board. I wonder if he'll ever return to this thread while Fake Igy is still trolling here.
Thank you. I might post here if the thread becomes interesting. I was long ago proven right in this thread, so it has lost interest mostly for me. OP said in 2013 that the Dow would drop below 1300. Second poster said 7,000. It didn't. OP even told me that I had been warned and to "enjoy the ride down". Yawn.
Don't worry, there is a new guy on the block (possibly the same guy as the OP using a different handle) making the same ridiculous comments about what the market is going to do. He has been entertaining us with a lot of meaningless charts, graphs, and comments. He is holding his ground no matter what happens, even if a bull market runs in to the next century.
mellon wrote:
Flagpole wrote:Thank you. I might post here if the thread becomes interesting. I was long ago proven right in this thread, so it has lost interest mostly for me. OP said in 2013 that the Dow would drop below 1300. Second poster said 7,000. It didn't. OP even told me that I had been warned and to "enjoy the ride down". Yawn.
Don't worry, there is a new guy on the block (possibly the same guy as the OP using a different handle) making the same ridiculous comments about what the market is going to do. He has been entertaining us with a lot of meaningless charts, graphs, and comments. He is holding his ground no matter what happens, even if a bull market runs in to the next century.
There are always permabears.
Try to keep up wrote:
So you don't use multiple handles?
(I won't hold my breath waiting for an honest answer. Cue the diversion.)
Crickets chirping.
It is the Detector Dude, he used an upper case "I" to replicate the "L." He did the same thing with my handle and the Moderators blocked him. A real crap head loser. Sorry, he is infatuated with following me around this site. He is also posts "Mike Long."
So you admit to being this Detector Dude. Now doesn't that just beat all.
What is your infatuation with replying to yourself?
Earnings Scorecard: As of Friday (with 17 companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for Q1 2017), 13 S&P 500 companies have beat the mean EPS estimate and 9 S&P 500 companies have beat the mean sales estimate.