Repair Mann wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I fixed your name. Your addiction is clouding your thinking. It’s OK. Buy some Bitcoin or Tesla.
My name wasn’t broken. I’m tempted to fix yours.
Thanks for the recommendations, but considering your record I think I’ll pass.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
That is why you are wondering.
wondering wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
I wonder what education you would expect someone to get from that article. Anyone with a minimum understanding of statistics would have to conclude from that that earnings are good.
Truthier wrote:
wondering wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
I wonder what education you would expect someone to get from that article. Anyone with a minimum understanding of statistics would have to conclude from that that earnings are good.
+1
Portia wrote:
All eight indexes on our world watch list have posted gains for 2017 through November 13.
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2017/11/13/world-markets-update?
Falsified wrote:
Truthier wrote:
wondering wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
I wonder what education you would expect someone to get from that article. Anyone with a minimum understanding of statistics would have to conclude from that that earnings are good.
+1
-2 = -1
Truthier wrote:
Falsified wrote:
Truthier wrote:
wondering wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
I wonder what education you would expect someone to get from that article. Anyone with a minimum understanding of statistics would have to conclude from that that earnings are good.
+1
-2 = -1
You are so easy to troll.
Slobodan wrote:
Truthier wrote:
Falsified wrote:
Truthier wrote:
wondering wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
No, you are trying to craft a narrative out os something that is distorted. Begin your education here. It is just a start:
https://us.spdrs.com/docs-commentary/market-commentary/Uncommon_Sense_False_Profits.pdf
I wonder what education you would expect someone to get from that article. Anyone with a minimum understanding of statistics would have to conclude from that that earnings are good.
+1
-2 = -1
You are so easy to troll.
?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.hussmanfunds.com/content/comment/
Face the fax wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.hussmanfunds.com/content/comment/
So even Hussman believes it is different this time. Interesting.
Gruntz wrote:
Face the fax wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.hussmanfunds.com/content/comment/
So even Hussman believes it is different this time. Interesting.
Igy doesn’t actually read the articles he posts. He just reads the headline, or the name of the author, and assume it supports his bearish view. Often it doesn’t and this is a good example of that.