D.C. runner wrote:
someone had to do it wrote: there is no way meb wins for 600m
I agree. Conservatively let's put Bolt at 1:21-1:24 in the 600. I'd put Meb a few seconds back.
Then at 800, Meb in like 1:58? 1:57? He's so not trained for it- and Bolt in 2:00-2:05. At 15:00 Meb would crush it, 3:50-3:55 versus 4:10-4:15. Maybe Bolt is even slower than that, I don't think we'll ever find out.
Obviously these numbers came out of thin air and have no possible justification besides my intuition.
Yes, they DO come out of thin air. Think of it this way... a high school runner that can't make it out of his high school district race runs 1:57-58...and you are comparing him to arguably the best marathon runner that currently competes for the U.S.A.
GET IT??
Before you raise age as a relevant factor, remember that Meb has given some of his best performances in the last several years. With a good 3-4 weeks of speed training, you would be an idiot to assume he can't hit the 1:53-1:55 range.
Just to put it in perspective, if you plug his times into a calculator like McMillan's, his marathon time produces a 1:43 800m equivalent. In other words, I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. Thoughts?