The Vindicator wrote:
they're probably getting scholarships...the Bill Bowerman Grant, the Dellinger Scholarship, the Prefontaine Memorial Scholarhsip...for excellence in the classroom and on the track. Lots of ways to get kids financial aid without it coming from athletic scholarships allotment.
This would be countable aid if they are related to any athletic requirement, whether they are awarded by Oregon, a high school booster club or any organization. If said scholarships existed (I'm sure they don't) a kid could take it but it would count against Oregon's 12.6 limit. Making up stuff like this is absurd.
Part of how schools spread money is by giving out what coaches call "12 hour fulls". A full scholarship is 15 credit hours per semester. Some schools are set up where students can pay by the credit hour regardless of how many credit hours are taken. Most schools have a flat tuition rate once they go over 12 hours. So 12 is the same as 15 hrs. However, when 12 and 15 are different there is an athletic scholarship advantage. A lot of your great track schools are set up this way. Coaches tell a kid they are on a full tuition scholarship but they are limited to 12 hours per semester. That means they can take four scholarships and turn them into five (4 x 12 hrs vs. 5 x 15 hrs).
The other way schools spread their money is non-athletic aid. I bet the academic scholarships are east to get (probably partial scholarship for 1100 SAT or 24 ACT) at a place like Oregon. Kids can also get Pell Grant ($4000). You put together a lot of forms of aid and suddenly your athletic scholarships go farther for more athletes. Coaches have to learn to be creative and use every financial aid resource available. Great coaches know how to use the system (not cheat, just use).
Another trick I heard one very prominent retired coach used to use was he'd give one kid room and board scholarship (example $950 stipend per month) to live off campus. Then he'd tell that kid that another kid on the team gets live with him but not pay rent. So two kids get free rent for the scholarship of one. This is actually not NCAA legal but it happens.
The last way is recruiting kids for a certain level of scholarship and then after year one decreasing their scholarship. Lots of BCS level programs pull this. They give a kid 50% one year and then quickly drop them to 25% the next year. They know they're going to cut scholarships after kids are locked in to open cap room for newcomers. Kids don't like to transfer, especially from places like Oregon so they'll likely not lose them. Plus at that point they have an idea of which kids are going to pan out and which ones aren't. The ones who aren't going to be the next big thing get reduced aid. In the BCS the mentality is that there is no room for development, just recruiting. That is why kids outside of the Footlocker scene are better off in schools just outside of the BCS (MntWest, A10, MVC, ConfUSA) where there is still some commitment to development.
If you want to be at a big time program you better understand that it's more business than track and field. You're a product more than a project.