u-s-a!
u-s-a!
Just like the Ethiopians. Poor at the WCs, amazing afterwards.
Strange stuff.
Willard could have medalled over 800m in Berlin.. poor race choice... looking forward to 2010
trollism wrote:
Just like the Ethiopians. Poor at the WCs, amazing afterwards.
Strange stuff.
Is Bekele not Ethiopian?
trollism wrote:
Just like the Ethiopians. Poor at the WCs, amazing afterwards.
Strange stuff.
It's called, "rounds." You think you're so smart but your writing reveals a total lack of intelligence and critical analysis.
Willard-Vessey 1-2 Now that would be a fun 1-2
OK. Bekele ran great at the WC. All the other Ethiopians were well back or dropping out, when it's normally close to a clean sweep.
Why can't he even break 12.50 this year then. IAAF should just tell us.
trollism wrote:
OK. Bekele ran great at the WC. All the other Ethiopians were well back or dropping out, when it's normally close to a clean sweep.
Why can't he even break 12.50 this year then. IAAF should just tell us.
you. are. an. idiot.
you look at one year and see a trend?
how about every time in the last year 8 years when the ethiopians have swept the 10000, won world cross, dibabas double in beijing...
the fact is that people or groups of people have a bad championship every once in a while, even if they are in good shape and it does not mean they are on drugs...
stop reading into everything
No, not just that. Burks was in position to challenge Jamal for gold, Mekonnen ran great and Melkamu ran as well as she could have. You've got nothing. You talk about 12:50 like it's a walk in the park or as if Bekele isn't targeting the Golden League. You're a joke and everyone with a brain who reads this board knows it.
Is that what is it called? How naive! The US middle distance women are running well all of a sudden this year. I wonder what is behind the sudden improvement...
video?