forcing the issue wrote:
Bad connection, you seem to be offering serious opinions. Which I appreciate. But can you present any credentials? I don't technically agree with you about Pose. Everything I've seen has pointed to Pose being an alternative, legitimate form, in spite the cult that surrounds it.
And to the rest of you, I'm not actually seeking a solution. I FOUND the solution on my own, and am presenting it to you in my hands.
Presently working on a masters in biomechanics and have been an assistant to one of the top sprint coaches in the world.
Pose has some legitimate good things about it, but in terms of the traditional views, it misses the overall picture.
I don't like to say that it is right or wrong, because I think we overestimate our knowledge of the complexity of the human body. What we now KNOW to be correct, may be proven wrong in the future. That's why I say Pose, chi, yessis work, are all off from the currently accepted views on biomechanics. In addition, they differ from what is being taught/used by successful sprint coaches in terms of mechanics which I think is the biggest thing. Because biomechanics can tell us how things SHOULD work, but the best proof is if it helps the vast majority of runners improve (not just one or two, because then genetics can supercede bad coaching/teaching).