stanford entries up!

UJEN - Unattached-Jennings

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Gabe Jennings - Male

#14 Men 5000 Meter Run - 13:45.00

gabe and the yearly early season 5000m races. based on what he had said about this year you might think no 5000s and just 800m and miles. hopefully he will have a decent early showing.

Mt. SAC Invitational

Mt. San Antonio, CA, April 13 - 14, 2006:

Gabriel Jennings - 22nd, 5000m (14:22.39)

Gabriel Jennings - 3rd, 1500m (3:44.91)

This will be interesting

REBB - Reebok-Brannen.N

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Nate Brannen - Male NA

#14 Men 5000 Meter Run - 13:30.00

I am computer handicapped. I go to this site and can't find where you go to find the start lists. Can you put up the start list for the 1500, 5, and 10K?

Not really as from what I could see entries have been listed by college not event.

Quite excited a Brit to see Lancashire and Overall in the 5000, Lancashire could run a good time...Buckingham as well.

Ryan Hall in 10,000 is eagerly awaited...

All distance marks (800m through 10k) have been verified and adjusted through a google search to create the most accurate desending order list. This is hilarious!!

16. Mike Sayenko -28:58.00

17. Adam Shimer -29:45.00

8. Jon Thomas -28:50.00

12. Patrick Werhane -29:00.00

These times never turned up on a google search. This is a total bullshit double standard. If these schools scratch stanfords back at their meets, stanford lets them fudge their times... Cool...

whatever. just run hard and shut up, dude.

go gabe wrote:

gabe and the yearly early season 5000m races. based on what he had said about this year you might think no 5000s and just 800m and miles. hopefully he will have a decent early showing.

I remember reading a few months ago that Gabe was specifically concentrating on his threshold to improve his 5K.

1. Ryan Hall - Male NA

#18 Men 10000 Meter Run - 28:22.00

This pleases me.

yeah and i thought he needed more strength to make the moves from further out in the mile, hence the threshold work. however he said he was going to concentrate racing the 800/mile, prefering to go up against the 800 guys instead of the current 5000 guys. as i said i hope he runs decent here.

where are you finding this?

I couldn't find it on the Stanford site, so I just found it through Google.

Wow. Tons of fast guys. Who says the US isn't deep in distance. Absolutely disgusting. Anyone see Stanford's entries!? Luchini making a comeback with Team XO?

1. Adam Goucher - Male NA

#18 Men 10000 Meter Run - 27:59.41

2. Bret Schoolmeester - Male NA

#18 Men 10000 Meter Run - 28:41.95

6. Galen Rupp - Male JR

#18 Men 10000 Meter Run - 28:15.52

2. Jesson Baumgartner - Male SR

#14 Men 5000 Meter Run - 14:05.32

Luchini has been entered in three Washington indoor meets this year for the OTC but has yet to run. I really hope he runs at Stanford.

Sayenko is an Olympic Trials qualifier in the marathon. I don't think Shimer has run a 10k yet in college, and if he has, its been years. Since he was 5th on the UW team that placed 12th in cross this year, I think it's ok to give him the benefit of the doubt here.

Wow...there are so many BS times listed...or is that allowed?

Yeah I got really depressed seeing the thousands of guys that were listed sub 14:20, sub 30. Then I realized that most of those times were BS. I still feel pretty crappy though.

soren wrote:

Yeah I got really depressed seeing the thousands of guys that were listed sub 14:20, sub 30. Then I realized that most of those times were BS. I still feel pretty crappy though.

But, as has been mentioned, many of them aren't. There seems to be a bit of a double standard going on here -- i.e. as one poster pointed out, UW and UO guys seem to have been allowed to fudge, whereas others have not. Either google everybody, or google nobody.

To the guy who said shut up and run, it's not quite that simple if, say, you're on the bubble between two heats, which might result in two very different race experiences, and there are guys being posted ahead of more deserving runners.

The entries, as a whole, are pretty quality though.

Surely when a big name puts a BS time down they can get penalized?

Like AJ Acosta throwing down a 13.54 and a 3.41!

Meh oh well...doesnt really matter - just makes them look foolish