The trickery and flattery with words you are so adept at is MOST IDENTICAL TO THE BEHAVIOR OF A CASANOVA OR WOMANIZER!!!!!!!!!!!!! What do you think I am to you for you to FLIRT with me like that??? You treating me like a woman to be gamed??? I'm not a woman!!!!
I'm very good at identifying patterns about anything!!!! I was once given an IQ question on pattern-finding and solving and I aced it all, right up to the highest MENSA level one!!!!!!
You are very good at telling us what you are very good at. If you were even better at these things, it would go without saying.
I really must have missed my calling. I have had some modest success with a handful of women, before settling down with my wife of more than 20 years. Do you think women generally find my persisent requests for objectivity combined with logical coherency attractive? That hasn't been my experience. Do you find it attractive? That was certainly not my intention. No wonder your responses are so emotionally triggered, like the angry woman scorned. Sorry if I gave you the wrong impression.
From day 1 when I stepped into LRC, I declared high and mighty that EMOTIONAL REASONING is one of the 3-4 pillars of reasoning on equal standing at least with objective or evidential one!!!!!!!!! I'm sorry but you must have lacked a father figure or something growing up or something??? When you took Dad's orders and beating, did he ever allowed you to 'objectively show evidence or reason' with him to exonerate your misbehaviors or sins/errors???? Or even your Mom did she ever tell you as a 10 year old or even 15 year old that she needed the 'scientific method' to convince her of your intentions/designs or moral behavior????
I don't think so right???? It was the emotional hence faithful bond and connection that is most important in your familial relationship!!!!! DAD WAS ALWAYS RIGHT, HE KNEW IT ALL, HE SEEN IT ALL, there is no freedom of speech much less 'objective reasoning' with him!!!
Before my Dad died he once told me:
"Khamis, a true friend or true human being true to the spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ would not straight up AT FIRST INSTANCE ask to bring objective evidence to the table about anything under the sky. If this is so, this 'friend' is in actuality your 'enemy' because he needs to have an agenda/trap-door to straight up start with objective evidence off the bat. He could psychoanalyze you, joke with you, banter or make small talk, give encouraging words and advice, listen to you, have faith in you, believe in you of all things to do with you and yet if he demands objective evidence you will know that your friendship has been captured!!!!!"
Look, my Dad is far older than you when he died, you are just a child/kid to him just like I was, you know sh*t and your objective reasoning is the same. I listen to my Dad so should you if you don't have one because it does seem like your behavior suggest you never had a relationship with a father figure!!! You were never subjectively beaten real hard with no objective recourse. You don't know how hard I was smacked by Daddy okay???
I didn't say women find womanizers who request for objective evidence sexy or attractive, instead I say that the identical-ness of your flip-flopping surrounding objective dogma is most like the also flip-flopping of a womanizer inasmuch as this flip-flopping also tends to flatter and bring pleasure to her ears, tastebuds and sex organs-----which of course we all know what the agenda is this way right??? It's SEX AND ONLY SEX DUH!!!!
This post was edited 11 minutes after it was posted.
Dear Steve, let us all know: what do you think of rekrunner??? Is he probably or definitely pro-doping??? He needs to be put in his own place and stand alone as a pro-doping with no ifs, buts, would, should!!! He likes to find escape routes in ifs, buts, woulds, shoulds etc you know???
This post was edited 41 seconds after it was posted.
You are very good at telling us what you are very good at. If you were even better at these things, it would go without saying.
I really must have missed my calling. I have had some modest success with a handful of women, before settling down with my wife of more than 20 years. Do you think women generally find my persisent requests for objectivity combined with logical coherency attractive? That hasn't been my experience. Do you find it attractive? That was certainly not my intention. No wonder your responses are so emotionally triggered, like the angry woman scorned. Sorry if I gave you the wrong impression.
He that praises himself spatters himself.
And don't forget we all have seen your utter lack of logic a million times in your tragicomical defenses of all the convicted dopers, from Gatlin to Houlihan.
In conclusion, your first two sentences apply to you most of all.
Unfortunately, I was brought up in a Christian Protestant Family as a baby so you know........
Faith in God is central to all reason and persuasion. It sets the tone in space and time. It establishes your soul, heart, mind and spirit. It nourishes it and future-proofs it!!!!
Lying, beneficiary of dopers Renato Canova used to claim in long rants with bold/italics/capital letters that Kenyans didn't dope and it didn't benefit them--then changed his story to top Kenyans instead of Kenyans and that also proved to be a lie.
On the one hand, there is what Renato says, and on the other, there is what "Steve the Addict" (and others) says Renato said. Having read both, your recollection is not all that accurate.
What I understood collectively from Renato is that the Kenya of the 1980s and 1990s and 2000s is not the same Kenya of 2010s onwards -- the story changed, not only to correct frequent misperceptions from those unexperienced few with contrary beliefs, but also because the facts changed over time.
This is corroborated by WADA reports investigating Kenyan doping, showing an increase of doping busts caused in significant part by exploitation from foreign agents and local chemists/doctors alike, made worse by a widespread lack of anti-doping education and diligence when receiving standard treatments for common illnesses like malaria, and common injuries due to training.
What I read from Renato about doping effects for top athletes concerned blood doping only, explicitly excluding steroids and growth hormones, on a population already living and training in an environment that continuously stimulates producing more EPO naturally, and thus more RBC.
Since his successful experience with Sondre Moen in the marathon, Renato has expanded his claim to include non-Africans who live and train at altitude for an extended period (e.g. 8 months).
The conclusion should be that blood doping will not help those who are already strong aerobically because they will not be limited by oxygen delivery to the muscles.
Whatever arguments you want to make, you need to make them stand on their own merits. They cannot be made stronger by fabricating lies about me -- not even by using unusually excessive BOLD ITALICS and repeating question marks ???? and exclamation marks !!!!!!!!! For example, whether RF/EMF is making elite runners measurably slower will not become more true under any hypothetical that I am a lying womanizer with a pro-doping agenda.
Lying, beneficiary of dopers Renato Canova used to claim in long rants with bold/italics/capital letters that Kenyans didn't dope and it didn't benefit them--then changed his story to top Kenyans instead of Kenyans and that also proved to be a lie.
Valjean the biotechnologist did challenge me to connect my 'hypothetical beliefs to 'objective reality'' but with 1 difference ...
...
You omitted to mention Kenenisa Bekele ...
Putting aside you immediately followed with two differences, if you already had a long discussion with "biotechnologist valjean", it should have been easy for you to summarize the most important factual details from that discussion -- say in a half dozen bullets. Apparently being a LADY/WOMAN/GIRL is one of the most important details. Maybe "anthropogenic RF was indeed not only PROBABLY DEADLY, but VERY-VERY-VERY-VERY SO!!!!!!" -- but your claim wasn't that RF was killing elite runners. You said that antropogenic RF makes elite runners slower, in an era when elite runners just keep getting faster.
Rather than talk about all the contributing and confounding factors you have thus far considered concerning elite performance, you give me novel and unorthodox theories that objective is not really objective, but subjective ILLUSION, and resort to fabricating new unfounded myths about me personally, and my childhood and my parents and my beliefs and my morality. What does any of that have to do with anthropogenic RF and elite distance running performance?
Whatever you want to believe I am, none of these intellectually and morally questionable personal attacks help you establish that 1) elite times are actually slower than they could be, and 2) that the cause is anthropogenic RF/EMF, rather than a dozen other factors related to modern living.
"You omitted to mention Kenenisa Bekele ..."
??? Again -- not sure why that comparison matters in this thread about Kejelcha and Cheptegei. It is not unusual that Cheptegei is 40 seconds off his track record in a road race in March without wavelights, apparently with the modest goal of getting the Olympic standard. After all, you've just given me few reasons why Bekele never ran 25:59, i.e. "injured in the lead up", not "in good enough shape", "didn't really get in much training". There are a dozen factors that can explain why athletes don't run near PR performances in every race. I suppose in an Olympic year, no one's goal was to peak for the "Villa de Laredo" 10K road race in Spain in March.
From day 1 when I stepped into LRC, I declared high and mighty that EMOTIONAL REASONING is one of the 3-4 pillars of reasoning on equal standing at least with objective or evidential one!!!!!!!!!
...
"EMOTIONAL REASONING" (Irrational Rationality?) sounds like an oxymoron.
Whatever you want to say about these other 2-3 pillars, you seem to agree that objectivity (i.e. bases in facts, evidence, and controlled observations) is at least equally important. Yet it is inexplicably lacking in many of your subjective speculations. You are missing one of the pillars.
I only ask you to provide me the objective pillar, and I will take care of building these other pillars of equal standing. If you prefer, you can supplement the objective pillar with your own suggestions, but the objective pillar is the only one that is mandatorily requested.
Unfortunately, I was brought up in a Christian Protestant Family as a baby so you know........
Faith in God is central to all reason and persuasion. It sets the tone in space and time. It establishes your soul, heart, mind and spirit. It nourishes it and future-proofs it!!!!
And don't forget we all have seen your utter lack of logic a million times in your tragicomical defenses of all the convicted dopers, from Gatlin to Houlihan.
In conclusion, your first two sentences apply to you most of all.
"spatters himself"?
Don't fool yourself with distortions of partial facts leading to oversimplified and misleading labels.
In line with the Golden Rule, I expect to be treated to the same standard I treat everyone -- since I am anonymous to everyone here, my statements of weight are the ones that do not rely on me or any alleged knowledge or alleged experience, or lack thereof, but rather to the extent they are based on objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations, or alternatively from authoritative statements reasonably presumed to be similarly based on facts, evidence, and controlled observations.
Don't misconstrue my pro-fact and anti-myth agenda that attempts to identify and separate fact from fiction as a "defense" of "convicted dopers". Conviction of doping is not a carte blanche to fabricate new myths about the "convicted doper". If I share with you established facts about any "convicted doper", these facts do not come from my imagination, but rather from external authoritative sources.
Dear Steve, let us all know: what do you think of rekrunner??? Is he probably or definitely pro-doping??? He needs to be put in his own place and stand alone as a pro-doping with no ifs, buts, would, should!!! He likes to find escape routes in ifs, buts, woulds, shoulds etc you know???
Since you are a self-proclaimed psychoanalyst -- maybe you should introspectively analyze why you need to fabricate and believe such things, and why the unfounded opinions of others would persuade you one way or another. Or maybe you should see a colleague about that.
RF research has, listen to this, INFINITE departments, just as you your professor in college would have told you "dear rekrunner, you can never finish learning and mastering knowledge", but this isn't mainstream everyday elementary school knowledge, it's RF, RF RF RF RF RF RF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's more pre-existing than human life or the existence of human beings, it has existed from infinity to infinity and under such circumstances the knowledge can never finish being objectively sufficient because 'infinity' or 'infinite quantity' is not a measurable or finite quantity. Objectivity is a finite measurement, and, RF research genius Henry Lai will tell you it's not possible to finish measuring everything in every department of human existence because the premise is true that humans cannot and will not outlive the Creator Jesus Christ!!!!!!! Secondly, evil and dark forces like BIG TECH AND BIG GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO FINISH THE OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT IF IT CAN BE HYPOTHETICALLY FINISHED!!! They don't want you, dear rekrunner to know what the measurements are, if any, okay?????????
So while I provided you ENOUGH objective evidence, you don't seem to agree that it's enough and even discard it as non-existent!!! You need to stop being a liar and stop being vindictive at me for correctly (in my frame of reference) pointing out that you are a liar.
I definitely did provided evidence that RF destroys (to all degrees and departments) human strength, energy and vitality. Human grip strength is part of energy, strength and vitality. For a start, prima facie, don't you need strength and energy to train at altitude and adapt, or, do high-performance distance running and racing???? It's a no-brainer so you are being extremely disingenuous in your failure to do logical thinking.
I corresponded with both Henry Lai and Olle Johansson in the past decade and they both told me in the interest of saving time, energy and resources, top researchers who are very experienced and conditioned intellectually and mentally for the job only DO ENOUGH objective RF research and subsequently only rely on subjective deduction/induction (what you call speculation and faith-based but which isn't identical!) to come to a conclusion about every other possible association or link with an infinite aspects of human existence-----high-performance distance running and altitude training being one of them!!!!
These researchers specifically advised me despite being as good as the RF expert myself, and are in agreement with me as well since I read all their works for over 20 years unlike you who is a two-faced baby and liar in the area of RF, that all the cumulative RF research up till then 2016 from 1930 is enough to at least HIGH PROBABLY, NOT MERELY PROBABLY, conclude that there is metaphysical threat to ENTIRE human existence and life on earth, as well as plant and animal ones especially honey bees!!!!!!
I asked them what 'metaphysical threat to entire human existence clarifies' and they said that WITHOUT doing any more further objective RF search from 2016 henceforth, it safe beyond a reasonable doubt to already subjectively 'speculate' albeit with reasoned deductive and inductive laws conclude that the health effects of RF, cumulatively in space and time up to half century or centuries, will wipe out ALL DEPARTMENTS OF EXISTENCE of human function and life AS WE KNOW IT TODAY IN 2016 BACK THEN!!! And I asked them what they thought of Google and Bing and national governments and they told me that's the power of money to rig all the search engines with 'no harmful health effects between EMFs and human/animal subjects'. I even flew to their countries to meet them and greet them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I had a personal and professional relationship and understanding with them and seen clips, pictures of how their lab was ransacked by government officials back in the 1990s and early 2000s and was repeatedly harassed at 5am at their door to warn them about KEEPING QUIET AND SILENT ABOUT THE RF WORK THEY DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So for the final time you unbelievably dumb rekrunner: both Henry Lai and Olle Johansson's instruction to me was that ALL DEPARTMENTS OF HUMAN EXISTENCE-----of which distance running is one such department right(??), is METAPHYSICALLY threatened which means the threat of anthropogenic EMFs is beyond and above just the physical realm----since they used the word METAPHYSICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
METAPHYSICAL means the transcending of the laws of physics to the one of SUBJECTIVE BEING AND THINKING, of spirituality of emotionality!!!!!!!!!!!!
They in fact want to mean and imply, and I triple confirm, that THE SEAT OF REASON AND EMOTION which is the central nervous system or brain center will be irreversibly blunted and wiped out okay?????
I only request kindly one last time before I call harassment by you, that you ACCEPT without lying all the until now accumulated objective evidence on RF metaphysically or totally harming human existence----taken to mean mind, body, soul, spirit as ONE-NESS to mean that it will harm all departments of human existence including sport performance, altitude training, sperm, sex gameates, everything sweetie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stop harassing me no more sweetie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stop calling me frightened, hurt, deluded, psychologically wayward or whatever the hell okay???
This post was edited 13 minutes after it was posted.
Dear Steve, let us all know: what do you think of rekrunner??? Is he probably or definitely pro-doping??? He needs to be put in his own place and stand alone as a pro-doping with no ifs, buts, would, should!!! He likes to find escape routes in ifs, buts, woulds, shoulds etc you know???
Since you are a self-proclaimed psychoanalyst -- maybe you should introspectively analyze why you need to fabricate and believe such things, and why the unfounded opinions of others would persuade you one way or another. Or maybe you should see a colleague about that.
From personal experience and objective reading of your posts and comments and its logical deduction, I absolutely with no delaying probability conclude you are probably pro-doping beyond any reasonable doubt!!!! No fabrication was fabricated and Steve is my trusted antidoping aide on LRC!!!!!
And don't forget we all have seen your utter lack of logic a million times in your tragicomical defenses of all the convicted dopers, from Gatlin to Houlihan.
In conclusion, your first two sentences apply to you most of all.
"spatters himself"?
Don't fool yourself with distortions of partial facts leading to oversimplified and misleading labels.
In line with the Golden Rule, I expect to be treated to the same standard I treat everyone -- since I am anonymous to everyone here, my statements of weight are the ones that do not rely on me or any alleged knowledge or alleged experience, or lack thereof, but rather to the extent they are based on objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations, or alternatively from authoritative statements reasonably presumed to be similarly based on facts, evidence, and controlled observations.
Don't misconstrue my pro-fact and anti-myth agenda that attempts to identify and separate fact from fiction as a "defense" of "convicted dopers". Conviction of doping is not a carte blanche to fabricate new myths about the "convicted doper". If I share with you established facts about any "convicted doper", these facts do not come from my imagination, but rather from external authoritative sources.
Well well well dear rekrunner, you see what I told you so right????
In every thread there is at least 1-2 persons who have had a negative pro-doping experience with your religious facade of objectivity and limited context!!!!! And I don't use extra LRC accounts to create the illusion of extra persons who are upset with your pro-doping facade!!!
You add up these numbers 1-2 in every thread, on top of non-anonymous ones like me, Steve, Coevett, Armstrong, RF Queen and it's no longer a small handful of 1-2 right????
Nobody has misconstrue your pro-fact and anti-myth as pro-dopers and pro-doping. It's not a misconstrue, it's an accurate construe LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! So much for word play here. I just changed it from white to black, it's just semantics!!!
Btw you are not anonymous to everyone here. We know you, we feel your soul, we feel your 'heartbeat', we feel your desires and biases and prejudices, you have been here for more than a decade right???? Human beings have 'sixth sensing' ability called gut or intuition or instinct. They know about things, these are legitimate sensing capabilities at least on equal parity with instrument measured or objective ones but if you asked all TRUE RF experts it's SUPERIOR AND MORE ACCURATE THAN OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS!!!!
Your claim that you are truly anonymous 100% is in and of itself subjective claim!!!!!!! It's non-objective!!!!! You are being measured every interval second of your space and time on LRC, your anonymity will be eroded in space and time for that reason!!!!!!
We don't need to see your face in a face-to-face manner to remove your anonymity!!!! On the contrary in 2024, it's possible that a son can remain anonymous to his mum and dad because he has no socio-emotional interaction or relationship with them at all being buried and addicted to his digital electronic devices, porn on the computer, or other addictions.
So I advocate for a dynamic definition of 'anonymity' in space-time, one that changes and weaves in and out of existence as reality is construed and perceived!!!
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Look, I did and said that to RELIEVE the poster of his burden that's all!!! I'm very good at word play and semantics too right??? Except that I used its advantage to glorify the Lord God of Heaven and Earth, I use it to persuade all things and arguments in His direction, that's the difference between me and non-faithful persons.
Valjean the biotechnologist did challenge me to connect my 'hypothetical beliefs to 'objective reality'' but with 1 difference ...
...
You omitted to mention Kenenisa Bekele ...
Putting aside you immediately followed with two differences, if you already had a long discussion with "biotechnologist valjean", it should have been easy for you to summarize the most important factual details from that discussion -- say in a half dozen bullets. Apparently being a LADY/WOMAN/GIRL is one of the most important details. Maybe "anthropogenic RF was indeed not only PROBABLY DEADLY, but VERY-VERY-VERY-VERY SO!!!!!!" -- but your claim wasn't that RF was killing elite runners. You said that antropogenic RF makes elite runners slower, in an era when elite runners just keep getting faster.
Rather than talk about all the contributing and confounding factors you have thus far considered concerning elite performance, you give me novel and unorthodox theories that objective is not really objective, but subjective ILLUSION, and resort to fabricating new unfounded myths about me personally, and my childhood and my parents and my beliefs and my morality. What does any of that have to do with anthropogenic RF and elite distance running performance?
Whatever you want to believe I am, none of these intellectually and morally questionable personal attacks help you establish that 1) elite times are actually slower than they could be, and 2) that the cause is anthropogenic RF/EMF, rather than a dozen other factors related to modern living.
"You omitted to mention Kenenisa Bekele ..."
??? Again -- not sure why that comparison matters in this thread about Kejelcha and Cheptegei. It is not unusual that Cheptegei is 40 seconds off his track record in a road race in March without wavelights, apparently with the modest goal of getting the Olympic standard. After all, you've just given me few reasons why Bekele never ran 25:59, i.e. "injured in the lead up", not "in good enough shape", "didn't really get in much training". There are a dozen factors that can explain why athletes don't run near PR performances in every race. I suppose in an Olympic year, no one's goal was to peak for the "Villa de Laredo" 10K road race in Spain in March.
Look why must you subjectively put the stress on elite runners getting faster against increasing anthropogenic RFs when you can subjectively add the stress on better doping techniques???? Did you read AIU chief Brett in Kenya right now who said that doping has become more sophisticated and undetectable????
Instead, considering AIU chief's authoritative statement which you seem to be a fan of, the correct way to view RF is that it's slowing down runners soon and fast enough in space and time that they have to turn to doping to break even and in some cases even slightly exceed equilibrium like doper Kelvin Kiptum!!!
No I didn't give non-sequitur responses regarding subjective illusions, it was relevant response in that objectivity is the illusion of your measuring instrument. Didn't you manufacture the measuring instrument with your own hands or machine to measure what you think you wanna measure right??? The thought and thinking process that goes into all these manufacturing and designing measuring instruments IS IMAGINED AND IMAGINARY, and hence the 'objective' measurements that result from it are a result of imagination as well!!!! It's all logical deduction here, I'm not saying or deducing anything outside the chain of logic. Everything is THOUGHT and MIND PROCESS, which is illusion which Michio Kaku and Verisatium on youtube also confirms as 2 authorities of conventional physics right???
The best objectivity you think you had still boils down to a single root thought or process of mind okay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are just as subjective in your Kejelcha and Cheptegei analysis come on, while of course I'm also subjective and I do admit that but I also remind people on LRC that when it comes to picking out the relatively more susceptible between 2 subjective arguments that's where my RF-trained reason and persuasion is poised to take over by storm!!!!!! You don't need to tell me how to subjectively reason and think about how athletes race or not in an Olympic year, my RF honed TOTAL ALL-ENCOMPASSING reason and persuasion skills will find me the answer and drop into my brain by itself!!!!!!!!!!!! What I don't know will find its way from the edges of everywhere in the infinite mind universe and be attracted in my direction like a magnet okay?????
That's how I will know what I don't know, I'm calibrated for that. You know what's calibration of instrument right???? My brain and soul is also calibrated to precisely be in tune with space and time and objective measurement of my such ability can ever be produced because God created the universe in a way wherein such skill intricacies or ingenuities shall remain an effective and efficient self-working mystery but working nonetheless!!!!!!!!!!!
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
That spatter statement is an old proverb. I could also remind Khamis and you of Matthew 23:12 ("And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.") seeing that you both are so fond of your Christian roots.
"pro-fact and anti-myth agenda"?? Calling a convicted doper a doper is a tautology but you even argue against that. On the other hand, your false claims that certain experts - who fortunately caused your favorite doper getting banned for intentional doping - were dishonest is exemplary for your anti-fact and pro-myth agenda and speaks volumes about your character.
From personal experience and objective reading of your posts and comments and its logical deduction, I absolutely with no delaying probability conclude you are probably pro-doping beyond any reasonable doubt!!!! No fabrication was fabricated and Steve is my trusted antidoping aide on LRC!!!!!
After commanding me to "Stop harassing me no more sweetie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" you post the above. SMH.
RF research has, listen to this, INFINITE departments, just as ... ... Secondly, evil and dark forces like BIG TECH AND BIG GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ALLOW ...
...
I only request kindly one last time before I call harassment by you, that you ACCEPT without lying all the until now accumulated objective evidence on RF metaphysically or totally harming human existence----taken to mean mind, body, soul, spirit as ONE-NESS to mean that it will harm all departments of human existence including sport performance, altitude training, sperm, sex gameates, everything sweetie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even if I accepted 100% "ACCEPT without lying all the until now accumulated objective evidence on RF metaphysically or totally harming human existence", recall you have alleged a 1) cause, i.e. anthropogenic RF/EMF, and 2) an effect, i.e. elite performances are slower.
Whether this is omnisciently wholly true or partly true or partly false or wholly false, what can we call the scenario as it stands today? Whatever you want to call it, by invoking all the rational/irrational/emotional/subjective pillars equal in standing with objectivity, I will simply call your "effect" "unconfirmed hypothesis". Once the "effect" is eventually confirmed, then I will call your "cause" "unconfirmed hypothesis". If dark forces conspire to prevent anyone from making such confirmations, this explanation at best still concedes that both your cause and effect remain unconfirmed hypotheses.
I can ACCEPT it as a reasoned hypothesis based on the accumulated RF-research, but I cannot take it for granted as a foregone conclusion, solely on the words of one anonymous poster's "EMOTIONAL REASONING" even when including hearsay statements from other top RF-researchers. The only next step of interest to me would be to first confirm your hypothesized "effect" even exists. Then the next step is to make unconfounded observations confirming the hypothesized "cause" of this "effect".
When I told you long ago that I will wait and see, these are the things that I am waiting for. I would be happy to wait in silence until the moment you can report that such progress in RF-research has been made.