kdko wrote:
Democrats are funny. And angry. And unhappy. And delusional, but at least, funny
People who get angrier about gun safety laws more than little children getting shot are psychopaths.
Texas food truck owner kills robber with her concealed carry
High School Running
-
35
-
arealitycheck wrote:
Anyone using a AR15 to perform a mass shooting has a mental health problem, but making it easier for them to get their weapon so you can shoot hogs with no aim isn't my priority.
well lets get rid of cars too and everything else that is a tool of mass murder. we don't need cars, we should be riding our bikes or running anyway. the liberals will love that so we can feel good about ourselves before a gigantic meteor takes Earth out.
14 -
arealitycheck wrote:
kdko wrote:
Democrats are funny. And angry. And unhappy. And delusional, but at least, funny
People who get angrier about gun safety laws more than little children getting shot are psychopaths.
bless your heart. a bleeding heart isn't going to stop a bleeding heart, that's equivalent of thoughts and prayers.
23 -
To everyone mocking my stance. Know this.
You should not be afraid of someone who is weak. You should be afraid of someone who does not care if he or she dies from defending this country from evil criminals like Alvin Bragg who is more evil than Jeffrey Dahmer.
23 -
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
arealitycheck wrote:
Anyone using a AR15 to perform a mass shooting has a mental health problem, but making it easier for them to get their weapon so you can shoot hogs with no aim isn't my priority.
well lets get rid of cars too and everything else that is a tool of mass murder. we don't need cars, we should be riding our bikes or running anyway. the liberals will love that so we can feel good about ourselves before a gigantic meteor takes Earth out.
Unlike guns, cars have some reasonable and nearly universal laws that protect safety; like required drivers education, age limits, drivers licenses, eye test, license plates, insurance requirements, and routine inspections. There are also certain types of cars that are not street legal. Comparing guns and cars is a flawed argument, and just another talking point the gun lobbies have taught to their sheep.
22 -
Some people on this board have extreme faith that they will be protected and never have to deal with evil. that’s great! I hope you’re right. however, evil does exist and while most people are ok with being a victim or a pre-victim, others choose to go down fighting. This lady was ready to go down fighting. I chose to go down fighting one way or another. some people are ok with playing the victim game. the ones who legally support the 2nd amendment do not. Quit thinking evil won’t affect you. EVIL WILL COME FOR YOU when you least expect it. WILL YOU BE READY. If you’re ok being a martyr for a feel good society, go ahead. Now, to give one’s life as a real martyr when all is against you, that can be noble. But not to a common thief, not to a crack head and not to any regime that pretends to care about its people, while lining their pockets.
11 -
arealitycheck wrote:
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
well lets get rid of cars too and everything else that is a tool of mass murder. we don't need cars, we should be riding our bikes or running anyway. the liberals will love that so we can feel good about ourselves before a gigantic meteor takes Earth out.
Unlike guns, cars have some reasonable and nearly universal laws that protect safety; like required drivers education, age limits, drivers licenses, eye test, license plates, insurance requirements, and routine inspections. There are also certain types of cars that are not street legal. Comparing guns and cars is a flawed argument, and just another talking point the gun lobbies have taught to their sheep.
you lack any logic and basic intellect thinking 1) with 180 million guns we can now limit them to reverse actions of criminals. 2) that new laws are needed when current ones aren't enforced and only the law abiding would comply. 3) that gun free zones (only apply to the law abiding) make it safer. 4) that having so many armed citizens isn't a deterrent to our enemies foreign and domestic. 5) that without guns there wouldn't be mass killings with cars, bombs, knifes, or poison.
let's just throw fairy dust at everything to make it better.
52 -
Jamb innnnnnn wrote:
Based Grandma
Thieves go home DEVASTATED (dead lmao)
Somehow dems support the dead theives? So weird.
Thanks self
Why you're welcome, self
10 -
zxcvzcxv wrote:
Here is the exact text of the second Amendment, which you do not know and surely have not read:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
It's all relative to a regulated militia. There is no individual right to bear arms without regulation. And that's how the Supreme Court rightly read it until 2008's Heller decision.
As usual, you are wrong. Prior to Heller, the Court had not ruled one way or the other as to whether the right was an individual right.
30 -
Jamb innnnnnnn wrote:
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
We're not Europe or Australia, please tell with 190 million guns in the United States how you would be able to take all the guns from both law abiding and criminals instead of a situation where just criminals had guns and with no threat their armed activity increased.
So as typical Democrats have a utopian bleeding heart mindset where they want to be, but they have no clue how to get there (just like the economy and other things).
'If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain'
You are being disingenuous. Show your source, a credible source, and link to it, stating that Democrats want to "take all of the guns." You can't do it because it isn't true.
What is so bad about being sensible with gun laws? Why are background checks a bad thing? I've got a Mossberg 500 .20, a Remington 870 .12, a .17 HMR for picking off pests and rodents off of my property, and a Springfield Hellcat 9mm for my CCW. Just for good measure, I have a TenPoint Nitro for bow season.
I'll happily submit to a background check. Anyone that has nothing to hide should as well. Sensible background checks will help keep guns out of the hands of yayhoos that don't know what they're doing. While we're at it, gun safety classes should be required everywhere.
If someone were to break into my house or business, and they didn't see me, hearing me pump the Mossberg will be enough to send them hightailin'.
Yeah, I'm a Democrat. Most Democrats that I know are in favor of sensible gun laws - not taking guns. You're just trying to advance a lame narrative, though. Republicans on the whole, not all of them, are not willing to offer solutions and pretend that a gun problem does not exist. Let's have some solutions and not a "guns for everyone" mentality.
Try to keep up. Biden said so, Beto said so.
21 -
arealitycheck wrote:
kdko wrote:
Democrats are funny. And angry. And unhappy. And delusional, but at least, funny
People who get angrier about gun safety laws more than little children getting shot are psychopaths.
The psychopaths are the ones who continued to vote for their religion of liberalism that elect people who ignore our border allowing drug cartels to profit and slip Fentanyl into our country that has killed more people than mass shootings have.
44 -
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
arealitycheck wrote:
Anyone using a AR15 to perform a mass shooting has a mental health problem, but making it easier for them to get their weapon so you can shoot hogs with no aim isn't my priority.
well lets get rid of cars too and everything else that is a tool of mass murder. we don't need cars, we should be riding our bikes or running anyway. the liberals will love that so we can feel good about ourselves before a gigantic meteor takes Earth out.
Do you think before you post?
32 -
Libs R Funny wrote:
arealitycheck wrote:
People who get angrier about gun safety laws more than little children getting shot are psychopaths.
The psychopaths are the ones who continued to vote for their religion of liberalism that elect people who ignore our border allowing drug cartels to profit and slip Fentanyl into our country that has killed more people than mass shootings have.
worst strawman of the day......
34 -
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
arealitycheck wrote:
Unlike guns, cars have some reasonable and nearly universal laws that protect safety; like required drivers education, age limits, drivers licenses, eye test, license plates, insurance requirements, and routine inspections. There are also certain types of cars that are not street legal. Comparing guns and cars is a flawed argument, and just another talking point the gun lobbies have taught to their sheep.
you lack any logic and basic intellect thinking 1) with 180 million guns we can now limit them to reverse actions of criminals. 2) that new laws are needed when current ones aren't enforced and only the law abiding would comply. 3) that gun free zones (only apply to the law abiding) make it safer. 4) that having so many armed citizens isn't a deterrent to our enemies foreign and domestic. 5) that without guns there wouldn't be mass killings with cars, bombs, knifes, or poison.
let's just throw fairy dust at everything to make it better.
1) We now have successfully gotten so many gins you can't take them away from us is such a stupid argument it is hard to fathom how you can type that with a straight face
2) The trope of current laws not being enforced is false
3) So you want guns in churches, schools and playgrounds?
4) Not 1 single "foreign enemy" is afraid of Billy Joe Bob and his cute little gun. Clearly Domestic enemies are not afraid either. Good Guys with Guns don't stop bad guys with guns
5) This might be the most idiotic thing you have ever typed (and foryou that is a pretty high bar)
22 -
mussibini wrote:
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
you lack any logic and basic intellect thinking 1) with 180 million guns we can now limit them to reverse actions of criminals. 2) that new laws are needed when current ones aren't enforced and only the law abiding would comply. 3) that gun free zones (only apply to the law abiding) make it safer. 4) that having so many armed citizens isn't a deterrent to our enemies foreign and domestic. 5) that without guns there wouldn't be mass killings with cars, bombs, knifes, or poison.
let's just throw fairy dust at everything to make it better.
1) We now have successfully gotten so many gins you can't take them away from us is such a stupid argument it is hard to fathom how you can type that with a straight face
2) The trope of current laws not being enforced is false
3) So you want guns in churches, schools and playgrounds?
4) Not 1 single "foreign enemy" is afraid of Billy Joe Bob and his cute little gun. Clearly Domestic enemies are not afraid either. Good Guys with Guns don't stop bad guys with guns
5) This might be the most idiotic thing you have ever typed (and foryou that is a pretty high bar)
LOL and you accuse me of not thinking.
If you are a thinking person, then please tell how you will remove 180 million guns from the United States including from all criminals, explain how perps in places like Chicago face the full wrath of the law, explain how gun criminals don't take guns into gun free zones, "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass", and .22 -
zxcvzcxv wrote:
Here is the exact text of the second Amendment, which you do not know and surely have not read:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
It's all relative to a regulated militia. There is no individual right to bear arms without regulation. And that's how the Supreme Court rightly read it until 2008's Heller decision.
As an outsider looking in, what is this "well regulated militia" they are talking about? If you buy a gun do you have to be a part of some type of group? To me, it seems that people in the USA just buy guns but don't belong to any para-military type group. National Guard?
10 -
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
mussibini wrote:
1) We now have successfully gotten so many gins you can't take them away from us is such a stupid argument it is hard to fathom how you can type that with a straight face
2) The trope of current laws not being enforced is false
3) So you want guns in churches, schools and playgrounds?
4) Not 1 single "foreign enemy" is afraid of Billy Joe Bob and his cute little gun. Clearly Domestic enemies are not afraid either. Good Guys with Guns don't stop bad guys with guns
5) This might be the most idiotic thing you have ever typed (and foryou that is a pretty high bar)
LOL and you accuse me of not thinking.
If you are a thinking person, then please tell how you will remove 180 million guns from the United States including from all criminals, explain how perps in places like Chicago face the full wrath of the law, explain how gun criminals don't take guns into gun free zones, "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass", and ."You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass"
They ain't much good against bombs, missiles and drones, but I get your point. The invaders, if they did land, would never be safe, but there wouldn't be much left anyway so they probably wouldn't bother.
10 -
What is a militia? wrote:
As an outsider looking in, what is this "well regulated militia" they are talking about? If you buy a gun do you have to be a part of some type of group? To me, it seems that people in the USA just buy guns but don't belong to any para-military type group. National Guard?
Militia's in a negative sense are thankfully not common, like the KKK. They should be relics. ANTIFA is more popular today.
The Michigan governor kidnapping militia only had 18 members, 6 were stupids and 12 were instigating undercover Feds.
All that said, Militias do become relevant, like in the situation of Ukraine, those types of Militias are OK to Democrats.
20 -
Lori Lightfoot wrote:
All that said, Militias do become relevant, like in the situation of Ukraine, those types of Militias are OK to Democrats.
Does that mean Republicans support the military invasion of Ukraine by Russia? Republicans support Putin?
12 -
How's the invasion going? wrote:
Does that mean Republicans support the military invasion of Ukraine by Russia? Republicans support Putin?
No, we support peace, love, and happiness. Too many young lives have been lost as the result of Russians, Ukrainians, and Democrats. Our advanced societies shouldn't be susceptible to the war mongering of politicians with ties to foreign oil.
21
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun