Nothing new here, right wingers and antivaxxers will continue to sneer, completely unaware they are the real dunces. And sane people will move on, not succumbing to a bizarre obsession that consumes every moment of their life.
You continue to call us dunces, and we’ll continue to call you useful idiots that willingly injected yourselves multiple times with an experimental drug, and then became drooling cheerleaders for one of the most corrupt industries in the world.
The company plans to sell the COVID-19 shot it developed with BioNTech for $110 to $130 per dose once the U.S. market for COVID-19 shots becomes commercial.
B. Harvard University, which is widely known as the apex of higher learning, whose policy makers are informed by esteemed experts from their own world-renowned medical school and public health departments, who have PhDs and years upon years of experience studying virology, immunology, and infectious diseases?
It's a tough call, but I think I'd rather trust my health to the folks at Harvard.
Is there any evidence that the "world renowned" scientists were even consulted before this policy was implemented? If so, what studies would they have cited?
B. Harvard University, which is widely known as the apex of higher learning, whose policy makers are informed by esteemed experts from their own world-renowned medical school and public health departments, who have PhDs and years upon years of experience studying virology, immunology, and infectious diseases?
It's a tough call, but I think I'd rather trust my health to the folks at Harvard.
Is there any evidence that the "world renowned" scientists were even consulted before this policy was implemented? If so, what studies would they have cited?
They don't consult with the doctors on something like this. They consult with the lawyers. When you have an endowment like Harvard does, you act in a way that makes it least likely to get sued.
B. Harvard University, which is widely known as the apex of higher learning, whose policy makers are informed by esteemed experts from their own world-renowned medical school and public health departments, who have PhDs and years upon years of experience studying virology, immunology, and infectious diseases?
It's a tough call, but I think I'd rather trust my health to the folks at Harvard.
You talking about the policy makers at this Harvard?
You continue to call us dunces, and we’ll continue to call you useful idiots that willingly injected yourselves multiple times with an experimental drug, and then became drooling cheerleaders for one of the most corrupt industries in the world.
Well, my good man, you and you chums are free to matriculate at Hillsdale Klown Kollege and other such illustrious right wing institutions as you might be able to gain admission to. Its painfully obvious you are not an Ivy Man.
Nothing new here, right wingers and antivaxxers will continue to sneer, completely unaware they are the real dunces. And sane people will move on, not succumbing to a bizarre obsession that consumes every moment of their life.
B. Harvard University, which is widely known as the apex of higher learning, whose policy makers are informed by esteemed experts from their own world-renowned medical school and public health departments, who have PhDs and years upon years of experience studying virology, immunology, and infectious diseases?
It's a tough call, but I think I'd rather trust my health to the folks at Harvard.
You talking about the policy makers at this Harvard?
This was taken to court where the court found that the admission policy was indeed discriminatory.....but it's okay to do that!
I kid you not.
Read this gibberish.
But the district court ruled that Harvard’s admissions practices did not constitute intentional discrimination, a decision that was upheld Thursday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Massachusetts. Although various statistical models showed that Asian-American students had a marginally lower chance of acceptance to Harvard than similarly qualified white students, the margin was negligible, the appeals court said. It also rejected the plaintiffs’ argument during the trial that Harvard’s admissions office had been affected by “implicit bias,” or unconscious racial stereotyping. “There was ample non-statistical evidence suggesting that Harvard admissions officers did not engage in any racial stereotyping,” the court said in a 104-page decision.
More vaccinated people are dying of COVID than unvaccinated people, according to a recent report from Public Health England (PHE). The report shows that 163 of the 257 people (63.4%) who died within 28 days of a positive COVI...
Do you even read the things you post Carmine? Or do you just read headlines? From your second link,
You are quiet literally the dumbest poster in the whole entire history of the internet.
So that one sentence "..exactly as expected" changes the data how?
That's just spin. Show a little sophistication
I’m sorry you’re too dumb to understand statistics. The article works through a f*cking example so simple the average 7 year old could follow it. Apparently, it’s quite beyond your comprehension. This isn’t surprising, because, as I said, you’re pants on head stupid.