The best takedown of Mr Peterson, in my opinion, is the one Pankaj Mishra wrote. JP told him that he’d punch him over it lmao. JP clearly just wanted more spotlight so he got banned from Twitter.
This might be a good time to point out the obvious: Psychology isn't a real academic discipline, so none of this matters. It's like if someone in the academic field of journalism or nursing or business administration riles someone up . . .
He is correct in his stance about the tweet and censorship.
But he is a sh*tty psychologist. Fame went to his head, now he's an arrogant prick. He thinks he's a genius just because he's dunked on some some college students and idiot interviewers.
If what you say about him is true, it should be VERY easy to provide examples of claims by Peterson that are wrong. I'll wait...
Please, don’t talk about incels unless you’ve got something substantive to say. If you want to use it as a descriptive term, good, but as an epithet, not good. It is a descriptive term and an elision / portmanteau.
it also describes a lot of people, with no particular malice or favor to those individuals