No idea how this film is getting rave reviews.
No idea how this film is getting rave reviews.
Your posts also suck and I still waste my time here -_-
I'd give it 8/10. The villain was very underdeveloped and his plan didn't fully make sense but other than that I thought it was fantastic.
Help me put this in running terms, with a sub 13:20 5K being outstanding, it this like a 14: 4x clocking: kind of entertaining but nowhere near truly good?
qqqq54q35yyy wrote:
Your posts also suck and I still waste my time here -_-
Jamin007. License to bore.
2.5 stars out of 10
I will only watch it if it’s a woman that saves the day
Nobody watches a Bond movie for an Oscar winning motion picture. They watch it for corny action and drama.
Consider that the OP also starts threads about how profound and intelligent country music lyrics are.
Currently 7.6/10 on imdb...do they know something that you don't?
jamin wrote:
I miss the old James Bond
Connery's death should have ended the genre.
Bad Wigins wrote:
jamin wrote:
I miss the old James Bond
Connery's death should have ended the genre.
Why? Did Connery's death affect Daniel Craig's ability to play the part?
Connery's death meant the part was played. Played out.
A dashing super spy can only have so many crazy adventures before the shark passes below.
Your review sucks.
incorrect
Bad Wigins wrote:
Connery's death meant the part was played. Played out.
A dashing super spy can only have so many crazy adventures before the shark passes below.
This latest film is actually pretty good and Craig has played the part better than anyone but Connery.
However that doesn't change the fact that Connery hasn't played the part in 50 years and his death shouldn't have any affect on the franchise. Had you said they should have stopped when Connery stopped playing the part you'd have made at least a little sense.
fada tyme wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
Connery's death meant the part was played. Played out.
A dashing super spy can only have so many crazy adventures before the shark passes below.
This latest film is actually pretty good and Craig has played the part better than anyone but Connery.
However that doesn't change the fact that Connery hasn't played the part in 50 years and his death shouldn't have any affect on the franchise. Had you said they should have stopped when Connery stopped playing the part you'd have made at least a little sense.
Yes but he never makes any sense,2600 bro.
jamin wrote:
I miss the old James Bond
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/27/23/40DB915C00000578-4548798-GOLDEN_MOMENTS_Roger_Moore_with_Maud_Adams_left_and_Britt_Ekland-m-207_1495923968488.jpg
Moore was the fourth best Bond.
You're dissing a relative of mine Jamin.
I still prefer Connery though.