investing noob wrote:
I would not want to live in any of those.
This list is pretty grim. Can't see myself in any really.
Atlanta has a fairly decent running culture I guess.
investing noob wrote:
I would not want to live in any of those.
This list is pretty grim. Can't see myself in any really.
Atlanta has a fairly decent running culture I guess.
speed, I agree, Texas and Florida are not the places to be. Everyone in Cali and Up north needs to stay there. since 2010 almost 6mm of you guys have left your liberal safe houses and infested the conservative states you hate. Please feel free to return to your liberal Sholes of portland, seattle, SF, etc.. you can enjoy free underpass housing and unlimited state sponsored abtns... your body your choice, now go get your booster shot!
shootpost wrote:
investing noob wrote:
I would not want to live in any of those.
This list is pretty grim. Can't see myself in any really.
Atlanta has a fairly decent running culture I guess.
Cheat code for life. Listen to liberal turds, and then do and think the opposite. Success and happiness await you.
Brooklyn. Small town feel, but close enough to NYC to have all the big city perks.
Someone really listed being a progressive area like if it was a good thing 💀💀
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
Brooklyn. Small town feel, but close enough to NYC to have all the big city perks.
“Perks”: filth, disease, weirdo leftists, crime, overcrowding, astronomically high taxes, suppression of individual freedoms, gross people.
Living In The City wrote:
What says you?
I lived in Scottsdale for 10 years and loved it. Great place to run. Yes, summers are hot but if you go early it’s still manageable unlike places with the horrid humidity. The scenery is beautiful, it’s very easy to meet people, plenty of places to go/things to do. Nice place to have a family as well. Good neighborhoods, and a lot of schools to choose from.
Was forced to move for work last year and miss it a ton. Trying to figure out a way to get back.
Atlanta, hands down. It has seasons, culture, big city vibe, diversity, universities, lots of green. Good running scene but from what I know, not many trails so lots of cement.
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
Brooklyn. Small town feel, but close enough to NYC to have all the big city perks.
I always thought Brooklyn is part of NYC?
Miami is a big city and the metro area is massive.
Disko Eric wrote:
Miami is a big city and the metro area is massive.
I though this too! I love Miami (lots to do, beaches, culture) but I also acknowledge the problems (sprawl, traffic, crime, weather not the greatest for running, expensive in the nicer parts, etc). It would be my first choice out of OP's options but only for sentimental (from there originally and still have tons of family there)... that's not helpful to them. I don't know the others enough to comment.
dan carlin hardcore history man wrote:
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
Brooklyn. Small town feel, but close enough to NYC to have all the big city perks.
“Perks”: filth, disease, weirdo leftists, crime, overcrowding, astronomically high taxes, suppression of individual freedoms, gross people.
I'm sorry your wife left you for the yoga instructor.
It isn't Atlanta's fault that you lack masculine tendencies.
You say what? wrote:
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
Brooklyn. Small town feel, but close enough to NYC to have all the big city perks.
I always thought Brooklyn is part of NYC?
This is technically true as of relatively recently. In the late '90s, the Boroughs were consolidated into one city. When I lived there in my younger years, "New York City" was just the island of Manhattan.
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
You say what? wrote:
I always thought Brooklyn is part of NYC?
This is technically true as of relatively recently. In the late '90s, the Boroughs were consolidated into one city. When I lived there in my younger years, "New York City" was just the island of Manhattan.
Uh, while people in NYC refer to Manhattan as “the City”, Brooklyn has been part of New York City since 1898.
Smoove wrote:
Gowanus Rowing Club wrote:
This is technically true as of relatively recently. In the late '90s, the Boroughs were consolidated into one city. When I lived there in my younger years, "New York City" was just the island of Manhattan.
Uh, while people in NYC refer to Manhattan as “the City”, Brooklyn has been part of New York City since 1898.
Correct. As I said, the Boroughs were consolidated in the late '90s.
Your the kind of person that makes people not want to live in Brooklyn.
Austin, Boulder, Albuquerque, Salt Lake City, Reno/Tahoe, Portland, Boise, Ashville
Smaller
Bend, Flagstaff, Fort Collins, Durango, Provo, Bozeman/Jackson Hole, Billings, Cheyenne, Anchorage
Definitely Atlanta. Waffles and a show.
https://twitter.com/ATLUncensored/status/1434396351303933953
Jogger262 wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
4) Miami - Florida sucks hard, and Miami is the suckiest city in that sucky state, so no way, no how for me. If I had to live in Florida, it would be in Central Florida away from massive hurricane damage, and I would visit the beach frequently, but not in Miami. Fortunately, I don't have to live in Florida and will choose not to.
I agree that Miami sucks. Tampa hasn’t been hit by a major hurricane in the 35 years I’ve lived here. Irma was the only real scare, and it was basically a bad thunderstorm here. It’s about the same odds as an earthquake in Northern California. The difference is you have at least a 72 hour warning that a hurricane is coming, so you can evacuate and avoid danger.
Central FL is hotter than the coastal cities, and your still not safe from a major hurricane. Why live in FL if you aren’t close to the beach?
1) Remember I said "if I had to live in Florida".
2) Central Florida still has less damage from major hurricanes than coastal areas. I would still leave the state if a major hurricane were coming across my property, but the chance it would still be there is greater than if right on the coast.
3) I am not one to want to go to the beach every freakin' day, and from Central Florida, the beach can be had in 2 hours or less. Big deal.