Further proof that SI has lost the plot, the swimsuit issue is an embarrassment that has nothing to do with anything else they do. It's a cheap, backwards grab at newsstand sales spike. Their writing has taken a dive over the last decade or so, then they had to cancel their photography staff. The only way they are still alive from dentist's office subscriptions alone.
GTFOwiththis wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Why do you think anything is being pushed on you? You're free to not buy a copy or to rip out her page. There is also an anti-transgender agenda being pushed by the right and people can have any opinion they want.
I agree with poster. It wasn't enough to push a black and interracial agenda (along with LGBTQxxx)into the faces and lives of the standard American white family, now we have trans! Gender benders! Suggestions that youngsters change genders without need of parental consent. On and on with racial & sexual deviations & low end humanity propaganda.
This is a dopey, ignorant, and careless typical comment from leftist crazies. That you're free to ignore mags like this and that there is also an anti-trans agenda by the right.
Reason for this is pretty clear. The far left has an exponential amount more money, media exposure, and influence to impose their scummy PR campaigns. You don;t see black, interracial, LGBTQblahblah, trans plastered on one magazine. You see this plastered on 90% of magazines that you buy, you see it in 90% of newspapers, you see it 90% of TV ads, you see it in 90% of shows, you see it on 90% of billboards, you see it in 90% of movies, and you see it highly encouraged an supported in higher education facilities. It is a slam dunk for the extreme leftists intent on destroying any semblance of values and normalcy for normal Americans.
Satire?
$6.99 richer wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Why do you think anything is being pushed on you? You're free to not buy a copy or to rip out her page. There is also an anti-transgender agenda being pushed by the right and people can have any opinion they want.
It’s on the cover of the mag, bud.
It’s the two dudes cuddling on the huge Delta poster as I walk to the plane.
It’s Bruce Jenner getting “Woman of the Year”.
It’s Rachel Levine chosen as the Asst Secretary of Health.
It’s allowing trans humans with male bodies to compete as women.
You can spin it however you’d like (which in reading your posts on this board, I’m quite sure you’ll take a stab at it); but it’s disingenuous to not realize that it’s a bizarre world we’re currently living in.
I looked up Rachel Levine and she is well qualified to be chosen for the position. Should she have been disqualified for being transgender?
Bruce Jenner was not the "Woman of the Year" and Caitlin Jenner did not win a Gold Medal.
It was a far more bizarre world when Trump was POTUS.
enough is enough? wrote:
When are the gay and lesbian activists as well as the feminists going to push back against this transgender craze. Transderism seems to be really quite bigoted if you think about it. It associates a certain way of acting with a certain sex.
So tell us when you started caring about gay and lesbian activists or feminists?
enough is enough? wrote:
Are we finally nearing peak wokeness? When the feminist movement was gaining steam, we were told that gender was a social construct. Now we are told that one's gender identity - not their actual birth sex (and please don't use that term - it's better to "sex they were assigned at birth") - is heroic particularly if it involves people born with penises acting in stereotypically feminine ways.
They are not acting in stereotypical masculine ways though - which is what society expects if you are born with a penis.
There's nothing wrong with being feminine, regardless of your birth. That's why trans rights is feminist. Feminism is about upending the gender binary - anyone can be masculine or feminine and there's nothing wrong with either.
Trans women suffer abuse which is directly linked to their feminine behavior (even if they're not that feminine, they are more feminine than society wants) Feminists should reject any sexist abuse whoever it's directed at.
$6.99 richer wrote:
It will be interesting to see how far the sales plummet. It’s completely fine if you want to be gay, trans, or identify as a stick of asparagus. I don’t care. But why does it feel like this gets pushed on others?
Because you are a snowflake.
Ask yourself, why TF do you feel like you are being pushed?
SDSU Aztec wrote:
$6.99 richer wrote:
It’s on the cover of the mag, bud.
It’s the two dudes cuddling on the huge Delta poster as I walk to the plane.
It’s Bruce Jenner getting “Woman of the Year”.
It’s Rachel Levine chosen as the Asst Secretary of Health.
It’s allowing trans humans with male bodies to compete as women.
You can spin it however you’d like (which in reading your posts on this board, I’m quite sure you’ll take a stab at it); but it’s disingenuous to not realize that it’s a bizarre world we’re currently living in.
I looked up Rachel Levine and she is well qualified to be chosen for the position. Should she have been disqualified for being transgender?
Bruce Jenner was not the "Woman of the Year" and Caitlin Jenner did not win a Gold Medal.
It was a far more bizarre world when Trump was POTUS.
As I said, disingenuous.
If you claim that tangled up person qualifies to guide matters of public health and policy, then there is no further need for discussion. You've adeptly proven my point.
Real Obvi wrote:
$6.99 richer wrote:
It will be interesting to see how far the sales plummet. It’s completely fine if you want to be gay, trans, or identify as a stick of asparagus. I don’t care. But why does it feel like this gets pushed on others?
Because you are a snowflake.
Ask yourself, why TF do you feel like you are being pushed?
Very “obvi”: liberal agenda.
EOT/
I lost my keys wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/26-old-hopes-first-woman-230009381.html
At last, someone for Greg!
govlie1 wrote:
$6.99 richer wrote:
It will be interesting to see how far the sales plummet. It’s completely fine if you want to be gay, trans, or identify as a stick of asparagus. I don’t care. But why does it feel like this gets pushed on others?
There are more trans posts on this LRC website than any other website/social media I look at
This.
I’m friends with several trans women and one trans man. And I still see FAR more trans content posted on LetsRun than any other platform, even when factoring Instagram.
What is it with your obsession? Trans women aren’t being pushed down anyone’s threat, they’re just being represented now. Big deal. I don’t know any cis women in real life who care. It’s just the cis men on LetsRun and politicians I see whining about them.
Grow up...
Dwightarm wrote:
govlie1 wrote:
There are more trans posts on this LRC website than any other website/social media I look at
This.
I’m friends with several trans women and one trans man. And I still see FAR more trans content posted on LetsRun than any other platform, even when factoring Instagram.
What is it with your obsession? Trans women aren’t being pushed down anyone’s threat, they’re just being represented now. Big deal. I don’t know any cis women in real life who care. It’s just the cis men on LetsRun and politicians I see whining about them.
Grow up...
I think a lot of woke people like to say they care. Because they are woke. It must be exhausting.
It must be exhausting clutching your pearls at every perceived slight. But you guys gotta helluva grip so I tip my cap to you.
It's 9:14 pm, so I think it is fair to declare you the winner of the White Grievance Thread of the Day! You also drew transgenderism into your whining as well. Congrats. It's hard being a cis-gner, heterosexual white man today!
Dwightarm wrote:
govlie1 wrote:
There are more trans posts on this LRC website than any other website/social media I look at
This.
I’m friends with several trans women and one trans man. And I still see FAR more trans content posted on LetsRun than any other platform, even when factoring Instagram.
What is it with your obsession? Trans women aren’t being pushed down anyone’s threat, they’re just being represented now. Big deal. I don’t know any cis women in real life who care. It’s just the cis men on LetsRun and politicians I see whining about them.
Grow up...
winner
I'm an uber-liberal guy. I used to get Sports Illustrated when I was a kid, and I liked the Swimsuit edition from about age 13-17. After that, I moved on to real-life females.
I'm for whatever a transgender person wants to do (except not for those born males competing in women's sports). If a transgender person wants to pose in a swimsuit in a magazine, then more power to them. Is it a bit weird? Yes. Of course it is. Just because I support someone's right to do something doesn't mean it isn't weird. Wanting to go dancing is weird. Playing the kazoo is weird. Eating eggplant or okra is weird. So, am I disgusted or grossed out by it? Nope. Is it something I'm interested in looking at? Nope. Do I think it is harmful to society in any way? Nope.
Truly pathetic thread, OP. Get over it and mind your own business. Why are you so obsessed?
charli3 wrote:
Truly pathetic thread, OP. Get over it and mind your own business. Why are you so obsessed?
OP is obsessed because he found her attractive... before learning that she is trans. So he is afraid he might be unconsciously bisexual.
But if you think a trans woman is a woman, then he is not bisexual. And what if he is bisexual? Is there anything wrong with that? The more the merrier...
Ever heard of LGBTQ? wrote:
charli3 wrote:
Truly pathetic thread, OP. Get over it and mind your own business. Why are you so obsessed?
OP is obsessed because he found her attractive... before learning that she is trans. So he is afraid he might be unconsciously bisexual.
But if you think a trans woman is a woman, then he is not bisexual. And what if he is bisexual? Is there anything wrong with that? The more the merrier...
OP goes home DEVASTATED and possibly gay.
enough is enough? wrote:
What straight man would want to sleep with someone who still has male genitalia?
A hell of a lot of men actually. Can't wait to visit Thailand one day.