San Francisco will remove Lincoln, Washington and even Diane Feinstein from school names.

Paradoxical wrote:

Freedom! wrote:

I bet Walmart loves having sponsored that message!

Show us the in that message.

Was that English?

Freedom! wrote:

Paradoxical wrote:

Show us the in that message.

Was that English?

lol

Greg are you there?

Breaking: It’s just been announced that every SF public school with now be named after Amanda Gorman.

true story wrote:

Breaking: It’s just been announced that every SF public school with now be named after Amanda Gorman.

What is that supposed to mean?

Paradoxical wrote:

You would think they would be spending more time fixing their rampant homelessness and drug addiction in their cesspool of a city, but that's not as important as their blatant virtue signaling.

You'd need to change the weather and reduce the compassion.

Most of the homeless have mental illness, and drug addiction is often them self medicating.

Its an abandoned group of people. Its tough for families. Their issues often sabotage their treatments.

miomago wrote:

Paradoxical wrote:

You would think they would be spending more time fixing their rampant homelessness and drug addiction in their cesspool of a city, but that's not as important as their blatant virtue signaling.

You'd need to change the weather and reduce the compassion.

Most of the homeless have mental illness, and drug addiction is often them self medicating.

Its an abandoned group of people. Its tough for families. Their issues often sabotage their treatments.

Exactly. Why won’t LRC stick up for these Americans?

America home of the free land of the brave wrote:

true story wrote:

Breaking: It’s just been announced that every SF public school with now be named after Amanda Gorman.

What is that supposed to mean?

Let me explain the joke:

Gorman is the current liberal infatuation and she ticks all the right demographic boxes, and is thus likely to be one of the only figures that (for today, at least) the ultra-progressives in SF could universally agree was worthy of the honor.

Additionally, nobody had heard of her two weeks ago, which creates an additional humorous element.

Let me explain the joke wrote:

America home of the free land of the brave wrote:

What is that supposed to mean?

Let me explain the joke:

Gorman is the current liberal infatuation and she ticks all the right demographic boxes, and is thus likely to be one of the only figures that (for today, at least) the ultra-progressives in SF could universally agree was worthy of the honor.

Additionally, nobody had heard of her two weeks ago, which creates an additional humorous element.

Says you, bigot

Let me explain the joke wrote:

Additionally, nobody had heard of her two weeks ago, which creates an additional humorous element.

You mean "YOU" had not heard of her until 2 weeks ago. Her name hadn't made it to your bubble yet. Many people have heard of her before, especially people in California. Just because YOU have not experienced something before and find it new and novel, that doesn't mean everyone else is as shallow and sheltered as you are bubble boy.

Freedom! wrote:

Let me explain the joke wrote:

Additionally, nobody had heard of her two weeks ago, which creates an additional humorous element.

You mean "YOU" had not heard of her until 2 weeks ago. Her name hadn't made it to your bubble yet. Many people have heard of her before, especially people in California. Just because YOU have not experienced something before and find it new and novel, that doesn't mean everyone else is as shallow and sheltered as you are bubble boy.

/thread

I'm a Californian and I vote that schools be named PS1, PS2, PS3 ... PSn until we get em all.

macdaddy OG wrote:

Renaming schools aside, do you honestly think that divorcing/cheating are anywhere near owning slaves/genocide/human rights violations on the morality scale?

Of course not. I'm comparing this stuff to what Diane Feinstein supposedly did. She returned a vandalized flag? You think that's worse than repeated adultery? Ok. I guess that's debatable. But what's not debatable but what I didn't have in the original post is that Chavez called people "illegals" and "wetbacks". He hired people to beat up non-citizens. Here is what the LA Times wrote, "Cesar’s cousin, Manuel Chavez, working for Chavez and the UFW, hired thugs to beat up migrants at the border in Arizona and bribed local police to let the vigilantes do their work, a project, as Pawel notes, decidedly at odds with Cesar’s “steadfast commitment to nonviolence.”

If you are going to cancel Feinstein, then you need to cancel Chavez as well.

Sharkz Jamp wrote:

Imagine if Rojo spent half as much energy expressing outrage at the racism and white supremacy hosted on his site over the years.

Yes, renaming a highschool named after Lincoln is outrageous........but why a rojo thread on this and not one about the storming of the White House by white supremacists? That would seem slightly more significant. Baltimore riots? rojo goes ballistic......white supremacist clowns invade the frickin Whte House? (crickets)

Especially for a site that refused to take down a reported post for over a year that detailed a plot of how to exterminate democrats in the cities.,,,you'd think you'd like to clarify and put some distance between the site and posts like that.?

Two wrongs don't make a right. I don't get why you - and most people in this country - can't just say, "You know Robert. It is crazy. The rules make no sense." Instead, you have to go point out a bunch of stuff wrongs in the world that also haven't been corrected.

I on the other hand can see things objectively. I knew in 1996 Bill Clinton didn't possess the morality to be president adn thought the exact same thing 20 years later with Donald Trump.

You want to know why I didn't start a thread ripping the riots in the Capital? I'll repeat myself yet again - because everyone with a brain knows that's wrong. If San Fran passed a resolution praising it, you can bet your last dollar I'd start a thread about how crazy it was to do that.

There are more than 10 million posts on this forum. If there is one that is bothering you, please call me and let me know what it is. 844-538-7786 ext 3 or text it to me - (410) 929-3368‬. I have no idea what you are talking about.

Freedom! wrote:

Free Speech Lives

https://imgur.com/a/1PTsyj3

What is your point? What I typed wasn't inaccurate.

But just to make sure that no one is offended, I have gone back and amended that post and changed "the normal" to "a cisgender".

I apologize if that offended you. I certainly wasn't implying that a transgender person is not normal in a pejorative way, only in a statistical way. Statistically speaking, the vast majority of people are cisgender and that's all I meant - normal in a statistical sense.

rojo wrote:

[

You want to know why I didn't start a thread ripping the riots in the Capital? I'll repeat myself yet again - because everyone with a brain knows that's wrong..

This isn’t actually true and you know this

Ana de Aardvark wrote:

rojo wrote:

[

You want to know why I didn't start a thread ripping the riots in the Capital? I'll repeat myself yet again - because everyone with a brain knows that's wrong..

This isn’t actually true and you know this

There are plenty of Capitol Riot sympathizers—some of them are elected officials on the hill. And yet you are silent about them

Nonsense! wrote:

Paradoxical wrote:

You would think they would be spending more time fixing their rampant homelessness and drug addiction in their cesspool of a city, but that's not as important as their blatant virtue signaling.

You idiots believe everything you hear about San Francisco on Faux News. Yes San Francisco has a homeless problem, as does every major city. Drug problem? Absolutely. But the rampant feces and drug needles that you idiots describe is ridiculous. It's made up bullshyte that you morons just keep repeating. San Francisco is still one of the most beautiful cities in the world and one of the most popular tourist destinations.

Grow a brain and stop being a sheep that just repeats things they hear.

Ironic.

America home of the free land of the brave wrote:

Gina wrote:

But but but Trump

Thanks for posting, snowflake!

Someone takes the time to post valuable facts and you respond with a personal insult. To quote Rojo, “this is everything wrong with America today.”

That’s the Left way. When they can’t think of snyhh th ing ejse to say or they’ve run out of talking points, just start calling people names. Usually, it starts with “racist” for any person they might disagree with.

That said, middle of a pandemic, rampant homelessness, drug use in the streets, a massive deficit, and the priority is....changing school names? Huh?