ExsessiveAmount wrote:
She is in the sport I fork out the $700 plus a month for it. Too me it is a waste though. She is not super talented at equine . Tge ladt show she did like i said cost us $500 and she DQ'd in every event. At 11 years old she can run 6:20's for a mile with zero training. I just see her as a kid who is wasting talent that is there. I think she could be a high school girl who runs a sub 4:50 mile. I took her to a track and she was hurdling the steeple barriers women's high of course. I think she equestrian for the wrong reasons.
Ok, sorry for doubting that you weren't a troll.
First off, stop sweating the horse thing. I'm personally of the belief that every girl should learn to ride a horse and a motorcycle before they leave the nest. So your investment in her horsing is a good one. I wold reiterate that she needs to participate in the cleaning and care of the horse at the stable to help defray costs.
Secondly, be patient with the running thing. Keep up the family track days and try not to introduce her to the wonders of lactic acid at too young of an age.
I'm sort of in the same boat as you with wanting my daughter to run rather her current sport - gymnastics. (I don't want her to quit the horse thing but I do de-emphasize shows). I think the reason I would prefer her to run rather than flip around is because I know nothing about gymnastics and I pretty much am always assessing running aptitude in every kid I meet. It's sort of my default.
In 5th grade, my daughter's school had a city wide track meet and out of nowhere she said she wanted to do the 1500 like her older brothers and she ran 6:01. I had never really seen her try to run fast before and it was a beautiful site. I think her desire/ability to run was mostly through osmosis as my wife and I still run as well as our two older boys. So while your daughter may not be showing signs of a desire to run, a low key approach, and developing a family running culture would be more effective than angsting over the cost and benefits of horses.