Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm surprised that nobody has brought this up yet. Apparently, a woman has accused Bret Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She did not want to come forward but a letter from her made its way to a congressperson, who gave it to Sen. Feinstein (judiciary committee), who turned it over to the FBI.

Reports say that the alleged incident happened in High School.

I have no doubt that reporters will figure out who this woman is. She is in for a nightmare. But if the allegations are credible, it could be enough for Murkowski and Collins to vote "no".

Does any of this stuff matter? If Kavanaugh is not confirmed the next guy run out by the administration will have a similar ideology.

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm surprised that nobody has brought this up yet. Apparently, a woman has accused Bret Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She did not want to come forward but a letter from her made its way to a congressperson, who gave it to Sen. Feinstein (judiciary committee), who turned it over to the FBI.

Reports say that the alleged incident happened in High School.

I have no doubt that reporters will figure out who this woman is. She is in for a nightmare. But if the allegations are credible, it could be enough for Murkowski and Collins to vote "no".

If the allegation is true, why did she wait for so long?

Obviously, it is politically motivated.

Guy who says . . . wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Thanks for putting it much more diplomatically than I did.

I doubt he’ll understand. He’s either an idiot or obtuse. I’m leaning toward the former.

Dude, I owned you on this topic, so you had to make up a fake poster name (and couldn't even spell Saffir-Simpson correctly) so you could try to save face because you said you wouldn't comment further. No need to deny, because I will not believe you. You suggested things I didn't state or insinuate or infer. That's setting up a strawman. You then make statements that are factually incorrect and tell me that I am "dumb" while writing "storms due LESS damage". Nice.

You should stick to your statement that you are done on this topic. I am done unless you come back here and I need to school you more.

Ummm . . . that's pretty much the definition of being "not done".[/quote]

INCORRECT!

You are probably right. But you never know how these things will play out. Apparently, Kavanaough had an accomplice. So there are three people with firsthand knowledge of the alleged incident.

Anita Hill didn't want to go public either. It wasn't until people accused her of lying that she finally agreed to testify. The same thing could happen to this poor woman. I'm afraid things are going to get ugly.

Make America Great Again wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm surprised that nobody has brought this up yet. Apparently, a woman has accused Bret Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She did not want to come forward but a letter from her made its way to a congressperson, who gave it to Sen. Feinstein (judiciary committee), who turned it over to the FBI.

Reports say that the alleged incident happened in High School.

I have no doubt that reporters will figure out who this woman is. She is in for a nightmare. But if the allegations are credible, it could be enough for Murkowski and Collins to vote "no".

If the allegation is true, why did she wait for so long?

Obviously, it is politically motivated.

She wrote the letter right after Kavanaugh was nominated. So she didn't wait at all.

It's just that it has taken this long for the secret letter to be revealed.

Fat hurts wrote:

Make America Great Again wrote:

If the allegation is true, why did she wait for so long?

Obviously, it is politically motivated.

She wrote the letter right after Kavanaugh was nominated. So she didn't wait at all.

It's just that it has taken this long for the secret letter to be revealed.

The alleged incident took place more than three decades ago. And this was not the first time he was nominated for a federal bench. Why didn't this story surface 12 years ago? It is a political set-up.

L L wrote:

Manfort cooperating with Mueller just means, ok I am guilty, give me a sentence.

It's not giving dirt.

This is what it seems to me too, but we shall see.

Make America Great Again wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm surprised that nobody has brought this up yet. Apparently, a woman has accused Bret Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She did not want to come forward but a letter from her made its way to a congressperson, who gave it to Sen. Feinstein (judiciary committee), who turned it over to the FBI.

Reports say that the alleged incident happened in High School.

I have no doubt that reporters will figure out who this woman is. She is in for a nightmare. But if the allegations are credible, it could be enough for Murkowski and Collins to vote "no".

If the allegation is true, why did she wait for so long?

Obviously, it is politically motivated.

Ah, the old "If it happened a long time ago then it didn't really happen" defense.

Apparently, raping people and blaming victims is a big part of what makes America Great!

///

MASRA - Make America Safe for Rapists Again

Flagpole wrote:

Guy who says . . . wrote:

Dude, I owned you on this topic, so you had to make up a fake poster name (and couldn't even spell Saffir-Simpson correctly) so you could try to save face because you said you wouldn't comment further. No need to deny, because I will not believe you. You suggested things I didn't state or insinuate or infer. That's setting up a strawman. You then make statements that are factually incorrect and tell me that I am "dumb" while writing "storms due LESS damage". Nice.

You should stick to your statement that you are done on this topic. I am done unless you come back here and I need to school you more.

Ummm . . . that's pretty much the definition of being "not done".

INCORRECT![/quote]

INCORRECT!

.

.

.

. . . correctly

Make America Great Again wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

She wrote the letter right after Kavanaugh was nominated. So she didn't wait at all.

It's just that it has taken this long for the secret letter to be revealed.

The alleged incident took place more than three decades ago. And this was not the first time he was nominated for a federal bench. Why didn't this story surface 12 years ago? It is a political set-up.

Even if it's politically motivated, it may still be true.

Make America Great Again wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

She wrote the letter right after Kavanaugh was nominated. So she didn't wait at all.

It's just that it has taken this long for the secret letter to be revealed.

The alleged incident took place more than three decades ago. And this was not the first time he was nominated for a federal bench. Why didn't this story surface 12 years ago? It is a political set-up.

Um...being appointed to the Supreme Court is a much bigger deal and can make someone decide that now is the time to speak up.

johnny99 wrote:

Make America Great Again wrote:

The alleged incident took place more than three decades ago. And this was not the first time he was nominated for a federal bench. Why didn't this story surface 12 years ago? It is a political set-up.

Even if it's politically motivated, it may still be true.

CORRECT!

Fat hurts wrote:

Apparently, this more than just a guilty plea. It includes a sentence cap and dropping some of the charges in exchange for cooperation. Sounds to me like Manafort will be giving up some dirt. But details of the deal are still coming out. It's 76 pages long and I haven't read it.

Well, come on.

Hurry up and read the 76 pages and give us a summary.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm surprised that nobody has brought this up yet. Apparently, a woman has accused Bret Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She did not want to come forward but a letter from her made its way to a congressperson, who gave it to Sen. Feinstein (judiciary committee), who turned it over to the FBI.

Reports say that the alleged incident happened in High School.

I have no doubt that reporters will figure out who this woman is. She is in for a nightmare. But if the allegations are credible, it could be enough for Murkowski and Collins to vote "no".

Does any of this stuff matter? If Kavanaugh is not confirmed the next guy run out by the administration will have a similar ideology.

"Similar ideology" in what? Abortion, campaign finance, voting rights, and many others. But apparently not presidential immunity. And the last one matters as long as 45 is in the WH.

Happy Friday to all of you patriots and socialists.

https://i.imgur.com/N4mk5NV.jpg

Just Another LRC Idiot wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Does any of this stuff matter? If Kavanaugh is not confirmed the next guy run out by the administration will have a similar ideology.

"Similar ideology" in what? Abortion, campaign finance, voting rights, and many others. But apparently not presidential immunity. And the last one matters as long as 45 is in the WH.

Yep. He's a very flawed individual, the perfect person to be nominated by Trump, and just about anyone would be a better choice. Now with this letter about him and questions about his gambling habits, it seems we could do much better. The defense that he was up to $200,000 in credit card debt because he bought a lot of "baseball tickets" doesn't pass the smell test. You want to sit on the Supreme Court, you need to have a history of making good decisions.

Flagpole wrote:

L L wrote:

Manfort cooperating with Mueller just means, ok I am guilty, give me a sentence.

It's not giving dirt.

This is what it seems to me too, but we shall see.

No, he's cooperating "fully and truthfully."

Trumpers still holding out hope their boy is going to make it through Mueller's investigation?! As an appetizer just remember Manafort was present at the "adoption" meeting and took notes. As Rick Wilson tweeted, "sh*t is getting real."

what kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?

FIVE! And we aren't done yet. But probably getting close - there weren't many more than five trump campaign officials.

Unbelievable, the amoral republicans.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/14/paul-manafort-becomes-fifth-trump-campaign-team-member-plead-guilty-criminal-charges/?utm_term=.e9f0374860d1

Flagpole wrote:

Jim Cantore wrote:

Thanks for putting it much more diplomatically than I did.

I doubt he’ll understand. He’s either an idiot or obtuse. I’m leaning toward the former.

Dude, I owned you on this topic, so you had to make up a fake poster name (and couldn't even spell Saffir-Simpson correctly) so you could try to save face because you said you wouldn't comment further. No need to deny, because I will not believe you. You suggested things I didn't state or insinuate or infer. That's setting up a strawman. You then make statements that are factually incorrect and tell me that I am "dumb" while writing "storms due LESS damage". Nice.

You should stick to your statement that you are done on this topic. I am done unless you come back here and I need to school you more.

Ummmm. Not the same poster. Hence the username "NOT Jim Cantore."

I gladly accept your apology in advance. Thanks.