Noticer of dominance wrote:
Call it what you want, but it shot up many deductibles from $1200 to $5000! Flagpole, LL, Trollidiotminator, Fatty Hurts, etc...weren't touched by it as we had to pay for them.
You still haven't told us what your rising deductible had to do with Obamacare. You really need to come clean on that one because without knowing the details of your health plans before and after, the rising deductible is meaningless.
The fact is, most people are better off with the ACA than they would have been without it. I'm betting you are better off too but you just won't admit it.
Fat hurts wrote:
Noticer of dominance wrote:
Call it what you want, but it shot up many deductibles from $1200 to $5000! Flagpole, LL, Trollidiotminator, Fatty Hurts, etc...weren't touched by it as we had to pay for them.
You still haven't told us what your rising deductible had to do with Obamacare. You really need to come clean on that one because without knowing the details of your health plans before and after, the rising deductible is meaningless.
The fact is, most people are better off with the ACA than they would have been without it. I'm betting you are better off too but you just won't admit it.
Betting you say? Email me, please, I can't wait. How much fairer can one be? You said betting, so back it up. For me it's compensation for proving that I'm telling the truth and that you are wrong. Go ahead, post your email, I'm in.
Most people are not better off, you're delusional or living in poverty. Many family members and friends are in the medical field, they think you're looney for making such a statement.
I guarantee you 100% you're going to look like a fool and lose money in the process. Honestly, you don't seem mental but something is amiss to believe people are better with ACA and that deductibles didn't go up. Believe me, if I was better I would happily admit it.
Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?
Blaming slaves for their own enslavement? Not wonder the right loves this guy.
Couchsachraga wrote:
Blaming slaves for their own enslavement? Not wonder the right loves this guy.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/celebrity/kanye-west-under-fire-after-saying-slavery-was-a-choice/ar-AAwBSdT?ocid=spartanntp
Coming from a left wing nut liberal loser like you, we're fine. Just go back and look at some of the goofballs that have supported the "Dumbocrat give me free stuff people" like you. Shall I name them all? Just think, the lady below could have won, then what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY^^^Yeah, this is what you voted for^^^^ What a mean vicious sick human being. But you'll debunk facts, that's what you liberals do, it has to fit your agenda or it's fake news.
Noticer of dominance wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
You still haven't told us what your rising deductible had to do with Obamacare. You really need to come clean on that one because without knowing the details of your health plans before and after, the rising deductible is meaningless.
The fact is, most people are better off with the ACA than they would have been without it. I'm betting you are better off too but you just won't admit it.
Betting you say? Email me, please, I can't wait. How much fairer can one be? You said betting, so back it up. For me it's compensation for proving that I'm telling the truth and that you are wrong. Go ahead, post your email, I'm in.
Most people are not better off, you're delusional or living in poverty. Many family members and friends are in the medical field, they think you're looney for making such a statement.
I guarantee you 100% you're going to look like a fool and lose money in the process. Honestly, you don't seem mental but something is amiss to believe people are better with ACA and that deductibles didn't go up. Believe me, if I was better I would happily admit it.
And you STILL refuse to post any facts to back up your assertions. This is the third time I've asked. If you can't even tell us the details about your policy before and after Obamacare, everyone will assume you are lying.
A minority of people are worse off because of Obamacare. You might be one of them. But you still refuse to post details. I think that means you, like most of us, are better off than you would have been.
43.3% and raising. Highest in a year now, despite MSM/establishment really ratcheting up their fake Russia narrative. It still includes some stale polls too. Wait til Trump comes out of the Korea meeting with another win.
If he gets over 45%, it's over. Hand him 2020.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
Couchsachraga. wrote:
...it has to fit your agenda or it's fake news.
Oh, the irony.
Flagpole wrote:
Uh oh.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/trump-lawyers-showdown-special-counsel/index.html
As was pointed out yesterday, this is not a bad thing for Trump. It's a HUGE step and gamble for Mueller though, because it basically ends the investigation. If nothing comes of it, he has to fess up that it was a giant waste of resources. Written responses (thanks, Giuliani & Co.) are the way to go for Trump, as he likes to ramble on a bit, which is not good in an investigation or audit.
Meanwhile, why can't we get the documentation to show how the investigation even started? Hmmm...
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/04/11/nunes_threatens_to_impeach_wray_and_rosenstein_if_doj_cant_provide_documents_on_original_trumprussia_investigation.htmlThere's simply no reason why this couldn't be easily provided by the FBI. It's clear the whole thing was a setup.
Going to be the biggest political scandal in the history of our fine country. They almost got away with it, too.
Real bad things wrote:
If nothing comes of it, he has to fess up that it was a giant waste of resources.
"Fess up"? Why? Did Trey Gowdy "fess up" after wasting MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on the *eighth* Benghazi investigation--one that came up with exactly zero more than its predecessors?
Real bad things wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Uh oh.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/trump-lawyers-showdown-special-counsel/index.htmlAs was pointed out yesterday, this is not a bad thing for Trump. It's a HUGE step and gamble for Mueller though, because it basically ends the investigation. If nothing comes of it, he has to fess up that it was a giant waste of resources. Written responses (thanks, Giuliani & Co.) are the way to go for Trump, as he likes to ramble on a bit, which is not good in an investigation or audit.
Meanwhile, why can't we get the documentation to show how the investigation even started? Hmmm...
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/04/11/nunes_threatens_to_impeach_wray_and_rosenstein_if_doj_cant_provide_documents_on_original_trumprussia_investigation.htmlThere's simply no reason why this couldn't be easily provided by the FBI. It's clear the whole thing was a setup.
Going to be the biggest political scandal in the history of our fine country. They almost got away with it, too.
1) The eventual interview with Trump is NOT a good thing for Trump.
2) It is also not a gamble and does not necessarily end the investigation.
3) There are no plans to allow Trump to give written responses. Your admission that this would be GOOD for him shows that you know he's guilty and would just be prone to exposing himself if he were allowed to "ramble".
4) Mueller will not be fessing up that this was a waste of resources. If it ended today and the President skated, we have already exposed Russia for what they did and gotten to a lot of bad actors. That is a win no matter how you look at it. Trump is going to follow...he WILL be caught.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Pollman2 wrote:
43.3% and raising. Highest in a year now, despite MSM/establishment really ratcheting up their fake Russia narrative. It still includes some stale polls too. Wait til Trump comes out of the Korea meeting with another win.
If he gets over 45%, it's over. Hand him 2020.
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
The danger was always that the bar was set too low and Americans forget quickly. If timing is in his favor, things will look rosy for him (assuming the GOP retains control). There is too much time left for him to destroy his chances though. But sure you keep tuning into them polls.
Nunes is the least objective GOPer currently in office. EVERYTHING he does is for the benefit of Trump. We know that because he has continuously broken basic protocol and alerted Trump of any new investigation findings as he becomes aware of them. He cried deep state and you listen like a good boy.
Oh yeah, good morning Gary
kibitzer wrote:
Real bad things wrote:
If nothing comes of it, he has to fess up that it was a giant waste of resources.
"Fess up"? Why? Did Trey Gowdy "fess up" after wasting MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on the *eighth* Benghazi investigation--one that came up with exactly zero more than its predecessors?
Yep. This was a ridiculous comment from "Real bad things". Mueller has confessions from or indictments on 19 people. He has others that are clearly in his sights. Russia and the American people have a clear understanding of what Russia has done to try to affect our elections. If this ended today, it would be a success.
Also, for anyone who still thinks collusion isn't shown, I have some swamp land in Florida to sell them.
This is what we know (and more I'm sure we don't know):
1) Don Jr. was contacted via e-mail that Russians, including who was described as a "Russian government lawyer" wanted to have a meeting so that they could provide dirt on Hillary Clinton. Why would they do that? For nothing in return?
2) Don. Jr. then responds that "I love it especially later in the summer". So, with that part of that sentence he showed he was willing AND he provided valuable feedback to them by telling them WHEN to spill the dirt.
3) They then DID meet, along with Manafort and Kushner.
4) We later find out that the lawyer is connected to the Kremlin, but the e-mail correspondence already identified her as such.
THAT is collusion. THAT is conspiracy. There is no way that it isn't. As I've said all along, I am not a legal expert, so if Mueller determines it doesn't rise to the level of conspiracy, then I will accept his decision. I can not imagine it though. What went on there is the very definition of conspiracy.
Do note that there doesn't have to be evidence to show that Trump or his campaign provided something in return for it to be conspiracy.
The ONLY issue really remaining here is if Trump knew about the meeting either before or immediately after. Don Jr. called a blocked number after the meeting. Who was he calling? Hmm...his wife who just smartly filed for divorce? Nope!
And then we get Trump Sr. embroiled in Obstruction of Justice when he helped fabricate that letter that said the meeting was about adoptions.
Trump will be found guilty of:
1) Obstruction of justice
2) Money laundering
3) Conspiracy (with Russia and then also with Michael Cohen on a couple of fronts)
4) and other things, but the big 3 are above.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Trollminator wrote:
Nunes is the least objective GOPer currently in office. EVERYTHING he does is for the benefit of Trump. We know that because he has continuously broken basic protocol and alerted Trump of any new investigation findings as he becomes aware of them. He cried deep state and you listen like a good boy.
Oh yeah, good morning Gary
Yep. Nunes is a bad guy.
I do not understand how anyone can objectively say that this Russia thing is fake or a hoax. It is clear that it isn't.
Couchsachraga wrote:
Blaming slaves for their own enslavement? Not wonder the right loves this guy.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/celebrity/kanye-west-under-fire-after-saying-slavery-was-a-choice/ar-AAwBSdT?ocid=spartanntp
Liberals and conservatives both love him for their own respective, various deluded reasons, chiefly being the shared fawning star fukking desire that is our version of the royals and also of course the execrable state of music education in the U.S. which leaves it's citizenry satisfied with audible wallpaper.
Real bad things wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Uh oh.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/trump-lawyers-showdown-special-counsel/index.htmlAs was pointed out yesterday, this is not a bad thing for Trump. It's a HUGE step and gamble for Mueller though, because it basically ends the investigation. If nothing comes of it, he has to fess up that it was a giant waste of resources. Written responses (thanks, Giuliani & Co.) are the way to go for Trump, as he likes to ramble on a bit, which is not good in an investigation or audit.
Meanwhile, why can't we get the documentation to show how the investigation even started? Hmmm...
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/04/11/nunes_threatens_to_impeach_wray_and_rosenstein_if_doj_cant_provide_documents_on_original_trumprussia_investigation.htmlThere's simply no reason why this couldn't be easily provided by the FBI. It's clear the whole thing was a setup.
Going to be the biggest political scandal in the history of our fine country. They almost got away with it, too.
Hey, Lying Gary! Why are you hiding behind "Real bad things"?
In truth, you should probably have chosen "Real bad thing" (singular). Unless, of course, you have some sort of multiple personality thing going on.
Anyway, stick to "Lying Gary". It suits you. (though "Real bad thing" isn't half bad either)
.
.
.
Lying Gary
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Trump should agree to talk to Mueller under the same conditions that Hillary got:
1. He isn't put under oath.
2. Mueller writes up an exoneration letter BEFORE the interview begins and leaks it to Trump.
3. Trump is allowed to bring in his aides under attorney-client privilege, whatever's left of that legal concept.
4. Mueller agrees to publish the exoneration letter immediately after the interview.
Limbaugh gets credit for this catch.