Jill Stein: "We might get a more accurate count of the Green votes"

This chick is a Grade A wacko

Wisconsin's elections office, Republican Mike Haas, refuses to do a full recount even thought it was paid for. Instead a mini-audit will be conducted.

So much for a fair recount. Wisconsin Republicans have no intentions of allow one.

Generally I'm not a fan of the Green Party platform where everything is a right.

But if you believe just the mainstream scientific view of global warming, Stein is absolutely rationale in treating global warming like its a WW2 event. Hillary is the one who is completely off the rails by playing up global warming on one hand, but not really doing much about it. Its like an Alien space ship suddenly showing up in Earth's orbit, and Hillary saying that first we need to focus on growing the economy. You are insane if you don't look facts in the face.

ryan foreman wrote:

Generally I'm not a fan of the Green Party platform where everything is a right.

But if you believe just the mainstream scientific view of global warming, Stein is absolutely rationale in treating global warming like its a WW2 event. Hillary is the one who is completely off the rails by playing up global warming on one hand, but not really doing much about it. Its like an Alien space ship suddenly showing up in Earth's orbit, and Hillary saying that first we need to focus on growing the economy. You are insane if you don't look facts in the face.

If I was an ant and someone stepped on me, poof.

Global warming will not adversely affect this ant in my life time. No matter how long or how short.

Climate has always changed. You youngsters are on your own. I personally hate the cold, and if I could get the temp up a few more, I'd leave my car running 24 / 7

ryan foreman wrote:

Generally I'm not a fan of the Green Party platform where everything is a right.

But if you believe just the mainstream scientific view of global warming, Stein is absolutely rationale in treating global warming like its a WW2 event. Hillary is the one who is completely off the rails by playing up global warming on one hand, but not really doing much about it. Its like an Alien space ship suddenly showing up in Earth's orbit, and Hillary saying that first we need to focus on growing the economy. You are insane if you don't look facts in the face.

True dat. I'm no enviro-whacko, but so far only the fringes are ringing the alarm bells, a very few are actually acting, but the vast majority of businesses/politicians are ignoring the issue while lip-serving. At some point in a few decades, enough people will be in crisis that action will be taken.Right now it's only, like, Saharan nomads who are directly affected. Eventually everyone will be and the world will have to pivot from More to Less stuff.

Of course, rule number one will be a choice between 0,1 or 2 kids only.

asdihjj wrote:

True dat. I'm no enviro-whacko, but

Uh yeah you are. Climate change has become a fearmongering religious cult. The Sahara was a desert way before anybody drove an SUV.

HardLoper wrote:

asdihjj wrote:

True dat. I'm no enviro-whacko, but

Uh yeah you are. Climate change has become a fearmongering religious cult. The Sahara was a desert way before anybody drove an SUV.

Sahara was a nice place to live 45000 years ago. But times change.

Doesn't she have a real job to get back to? When will she go away?

Actually the Sahara was a nice place to live until 5,000 years ago. Recent deforestation has led to the southern part of the Sahara expanding.

Bleu wrote:

Doesn't she have a real job to get back to? When will she go away?

Trump doesn't have a "real" job either.

Soooo.....a $7,000,000 fundraiser to find out if a $2,000,000 campaign goes from "less than 1% of the popular vote" all the way to "almost 1% of the popular vote".

Good God, how did we possibly not elect this woman to fix our economy?!?!?

That is most certainly NOT the main reason this irrelevant nutbag is doing this.

I guess his money fell in his lap. I'd say he has a job now.

ryan foreman wrote:

Generally I'm not a fan of the Green Party platform where everything is a right.

But if you believe just the mainstream scientific view of global warming, Stein is absolutely rationale in treating global warming like its a WW2 event. Hillary is the one who is completely off the rails by playing up global warming on one hand, but not really doing much about it. Its like an Alien space ship suddenly showing up in Earth's orbit, and Hillary saying that first we need to focus on growing the economy. You are insane if you don't look facts in the face.

If Stein was rational, she'd have seen that by putting herself in the election, she'd pull votes away from Clinton, who at least had some passing interest in climate change. Of course now that Trump won, Stein suddenly realizes what an idiot she is...

If Stein's votes had gone to Clinton, she would have won Wisconsin and Michigan, and it would be too close to call in Pennsylvania.

Nice job, Jill.

Bleu wrote:

I guess his money fell in his lap. I'd say he has a job now.

Trump stated he would forgo the pay.

Instead he is counting on deferred projects in other countries allowed to move forward as 'presidential' favors. That has already started to happen.

HUGE COINCIDENCE: Trump’s Foreign Real Estate Deals Suddenly Approved After *One Presidential* Call

After speaking with Argentina’s president, President-elect Donald Trump’s previously stalled building project is now up and running once again.

After getting permission by the Argentinian government, the massive building project, which will cost $100 million dollars, is set to break ground in June 2017.

http://goneleft.com/huge-coincidence-trumps-foreign-real-estate-deals-suddenly-approved-after-one-presidential-call/

IT Guy wrote:

If Stein was rational, she'd have seen that by putting herself in the election, she'd pull votes away from Clinton, who at least had some passing interest in climate change. Of course now that Trump won, Stein suddenly realizes what an idiot she is...

If Stein's votes had gone to Clinton, she would have won Wisconsin and Michigan, and it would be too close to call in Pennsylvania.

Nice job, Jill.

Yep, I think she had an epiphany on Nov 9. She called them both equally awful up until then. Imagine the atmosphere of the country if these three recounts turn up credible evidence that HC won those states.

Exactly right wrote:

IT Guy wrote:

If Stein was rational, she'd have seen that by putting herself in the election, she'd pull votes away from Clinton, who at least had some passing interest in climate change. Of course now that Trump won, Stein suddenly realizes what an idiot she is...

If Stein's votes had gone to Clinton, she would have won Wisconsin and Michigan, and it would be too close to call in Pennsylvania.

Nice job, Jill.

Yep, I think she had an epiphany on Nov 9. She called them both equally awful up until then. Imagine the atmosphere of the country if these three recounts turn up credible evidence that HC won those states.

I would guess only if they allow Stein votes to go to Clinton, and even then, it wouldn't be enough. Any statistical analysis study will tell you overall results from about 1000 random votes. Who needs to recount or than a bunch of lawyers who can't find enough clients to keep their businesses in the black.

Exactly right wrote:

Yep, I think she had an epiphany on Nov 9. She called them both equally awful up until then. Imagine the atmosphere of the country if these three recounts turn up credible evidence that HC won those states.

I think I'll imagine unicorns and fairy princesses instead. I'm more of a realist than you.

That is fine. If you don't believe in global warming then you are excused. I'll leave that to another thread. But I would say a majority of Hillary voters believe in the mainstream view of the tremendous damage global warming. They are the nut cases, not Stein.

Oh god! your name has to be stupid!? How old are you, f*&^king 11?